0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
similar to a solar eclipse by the moon, as viewed from the earth
General Relativity, as provided by Einstein, does not predict such a shadow. The QM Graviton does not seem developed enough to predict an outcome, but I suspect it will be the same as GR.Quotesimilar to a solar eclipse by the moon, as viewed from the earthIf there were a gravity shadow cast by the moon, we would expect some kind of earth-orbit anomaly during the eclipse. We do not see one.I have a speculative notion about the cause of gravity. It too predicts that there will be no gravity shadow. It also predicts that a black hole can not develop. Gravity is an electromagnetic phenomenon. It happens because photons exist as saturated points within electric and magnetic fields. Away from the points the fields are too weak to interact directly with matter. So they are all invasive, going right through massive objects. But the fields do contribute toward the saturation amplitude of photon points moving through them. This contribution causes the points to reach saturation at an offset toward increasing field strength.
Gravity shielding has the potential to explain the 'missing mass' problem as well as the 100,000 year ice age cycle mystery.
QuoteGravity shielding has the potential to explain the 'missing mass' problem as well as the 100,000 year ice age cycle mystery.You would need to explain why we do not see a gravity anomaly in earth's orbit when the moon's shadow crosses the earth.My pet scheme does not have a creation theory. Everything is pretty much as it has always been. Galaxies churn matter into energy and sling it out into free space. Free space congeals the energy back into matter and gravity forms it into galaxies. It is an endless cycle that repeats forever.
I can imagine contra-rotating ring helix structures. But I can't imagine why you need them to explain anything. That image brings more questions than answers.