The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Why do protons not decay?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why do protons not decay?

  • 5 Replies
  • 1453 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest46746

  • Guest
Why do protons not decay?
« on: 25/08/2018 16:47:20 »
Why don't proton decay?  It's rather obvious. After the big bang, the universe reached equilibrium with a wide discrepancy between matter and anti-matter distribution. It seems that after the big bang, matter repelled anti-matter  out of the Universe possibly via magnetism. The Universe had yet to reach any proportion and the ejection left only a very small remanent of anti-matter. This small remanent of anti-matter, exist at an equilibrium that allows forced compression of matter and anti-matter to exist in very small exceptions in the Universe. The most notable exception would be the force of gravity prior to a super nova.  The gravity of a failing star due to it's enormous weight could pull in an anti-matter particle, and a chain reaction explosion producing a super nova would ensue.

The anti-matter expelled after the big bang, produced a Universal membrane boundary. This boundary/barrier creates a bubble of negative sum pressure within Universe that appears as dark matter, dark energy. The expelled anti-matter applies pressure to this Universal membrane and itself is expanding into anti-matter space much as our Universe continues to expand. The analogy of opposites is that our Universe appears as a White hole consuming anti-matter space from within. The equilization on both sides of the Universal membrane is not completely implacable and matter leaks into the Anti-matter Universe and visa-versa.

The first proposed experiment would be to measure proton decay which would require an instrument with the ability to detect a level of 10 to the 34th power. This experiment is in it's initial stages.




Logged
 



guest46746

  • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Why do protons not decay?
    « Reply #1 on: 25/08/2018 16:53:15 »
     The equilization on both sides of the Universal membrane is not completely implacable and matter leaks into the Anti-matter Universe and visa-versa. This leakage would be akin yo quantum tunneling at a Universal scale
    Logged
     

    Online Bored chemist

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 22548
    • Activity:
      100%
    • Thanked: 580 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Why do protons not decay?
    « Reply #2 on: 25/08/2018 17:01:45 »
    Quote from: Pesqueira on 25/08/2018 16:47:20
    the big bang, matter repelled anti-matter  out of the Universe
    Where to?
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     

    Offline Kryptid

    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ********
    • 5994
    • Activity:
      87.5%
    • Thanked: 287 times
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Why do protons not decay?
    « Reply #3 on: 25/08/2018 20:17:31 »
    Quote from: Pesqueira on 25/08/2018 16:47:20
    It seems that after the big bang, matter repelled anti-matter  out of the Universe possibly via magnetism.

    Through what mechanism would magnetism accomplish this?
    Logged
     

    guest46746

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Why do protons not decay?
    « Reply #4 on: 25/08/2018 20:31:13 »
    All the anti-matter that was expelled after the big bang was expelled into its own space outside our Universe. It is its own Universe which surrounds our Universe. As our Universe expands outward the anti-matter Universe expands outward from the resulting pressure of our Universe. The anti-matter Universe constrains our Universe outward expansion.  It is a left handed chirality Universe being constrained by a righthanded anti-matter Universe. Gravity alone does not constrain our Universe. We see our Universe's expansion as being driven by dark matter and dark energy. We also view it as a cohesive force in conjunction with gravity in regards to galaxy formation. A surrounding antimatter Universe exerting its influence over its subset Universe by the nature of its opposite chirality. This dynamic produces a negative sum energy in our Universe. This negative sum energy has both a attracting and repealing depending on the presence or absence of gravity.  Our Universe as the opposite effect on the anti-matter Universe.
    Instead of being a repelling force it holds the anti-matter Universe with a force of Attraction. This force of Attraction is the primordial force of quantum entanglement. Its presents itself as a dominating  unseen force in an anti-matter Universe. Dark matter, dark energy pulls our Universe outward when gravity is not present, When gravity is present it acts as a cohesive force with Gravity. In the anti-matter Universe our Universe has a gravitational\attraction  effect. The subset's lefthanded chirality as the core of the righthanded chirality produces an unseen attraction to a center. The anti-matter Universe particle properties at the same time are repelled by the attraction force, just as in the inception of both Universes in the big bang. Its a dynamic relationship between both Universes.


    please excuse grammer only spelling errors!  lol


    Logged
     



    guest46746

    • Guest
  • Best Answer
  • Re: Why do protons not decay?
    « Reply #5 on: 25/08/2018 21:24:27 »
    Pardon, electro-magnetism not magnetism, slightly dyslectic, lol. Matter and anti-matter naturally repel each other. This is the result of the releasing/decaying or annihilation of a binding gluons used to hold the four fundamental forces of the UFT together prior to the big bang. The gluon force must have been one capable of subduing both matter and anti-matter properties. Once the big bang occurred, it is reasonable to conjecture that the nature of the big bang was sufficient to overcome the force of the gluon. The resulting splitting of the four fundamental forces created the unleashing of matter's and anti-matter's native properties. Whether the native properties existed prior to the big band or the adoption of the differentiating chirality occurred as a result of the big bang is to be determined.

    quantum entanglement is an attracting force. chirality is a repelling force. at one time prior to the big bang both occupied the same space. the nature of bosonic and fermion quantum energies allows both energies to occupy the same space.  what is the "gluon" mechanism that allows this quantum event to exist?


    protons do not decay for the same reason anti-matter does not decay. they inhabit sterile regions essentially void of each other. When in contact with each other they resort to an annihilation born in the big bang. Without the gluon that suppressed their chirality aspects and negated their quantum entanglement aspects both remain opposed to the other. This opposition effect is evident in the strong nuclear force, while the weak nuclear force demonstrates a binding force. Understanding how the four fundamental forces relate to anti-matter is tantamount to producing a comprehensive Unified Field Theory.
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.113 seconds with 43 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.