Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: LB7 on 08/07/2015 23:01:26

Title: Cancelled
Post by: LB7 on 08/07/2015 23:01:26

-

Title: Re: The sum of energy
Post by: alancalverd on 08/07/2015 23:52:00

That's why you shouldn't use discretised simulations of smoothly analytic equations. 

Title: Re: The sum of energy
Post by: jeffreyH on 09/07/2015 13:40:05

Why would you have dipole gravity? There isn't a charge associated with gravity. You have neutral particles that are equally affected by gravity as the charged ones. You are more likely to make progress in relating kinetic energy to gravitation than you are with charge. At least kinetic energy has a relationship to the wave nature of mass. Charge would in no way explain time dilation as it is invariant in all inertial frames. If you look at your diagrams with respect to angular momentum that is something entirely different and much more valid.

Title: Re: The sum of energy
Post by: jeffreyH on 09/07/2015 13:47:59

Here is something simple to start you off.

http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/py105/AngularMo.html (http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/py105/AngularMo.html)