1
Technology / Cheap Chinese compact fluorescent lamps
« on: 04/02/2009 13:20:53 »
They cost two or three times less then a good CFL, and it seems that there are only daylight (6500K) models. Their power ranges from 20 to 50 watts, but their light output is low. They are as bright as incandescent bulb of the same power.
I was just wondering - how can you make a fluorescent lamp so badly. If you had too little mercury in it, it would glow red (neon and other gasses), if the phosphorus layer was too thin it would be bluish or violet. Light output per watt of all fluorescent lights should be roughly the same, right? Then I opened few of them, and few good CFLs and I noticed that good ones have transistors rated for much higher power than Chinese ones. Chinese lamps are also a lot cooler then normal CFLs, the one I now have in my desk lamp is rated at 36W, but is is as warm as 36W 4ft fluorescent tube, only slightly warmer than room temperature. Even if they had terribly inefficient phosphorus that absorbs more UV than it converts it should be a lot warmer, right? Electronic ballast should be warm too if it really gives 36 watts, but it's not warm at all.
My conclusion is that these CFLs use only about 10-15W, and that the Chinese only stamp higher numbers to trick people into thinking that their lamps are good. What do you think about this?
The reason that I'm making all this fuss is that I could really use about dozen of cheap CFLs even if they are dim (desk lamps, closets...), but if they consume the amount of power that is stamped on them, then it has no point. I have no easy way of measuring the power, I have only two multimeters, but none of them can measure AC current (and then there's power factor...).
Btw, I'm from Serbia, and I think that these crappy CFLs are only exported into crappy countries like mine, I don't think you can buy them in any normal country.
I was just wondering - how can you make a fluorescent lamp so badly. If you had too little mercury in it, it would glow red (neon and other gasses), if the phosphorus layer was too thin it would be bluish or violet. Light output per watt of all fluorescent lights should be roughly the same, right? Then I opened few of them, and few good CFLs and I noticed that good ones have transistors rated for much higher power than Chinese ones. Chinese lamps are also a lot cooler then normal CFLs, the one I now have in my desk lamp is rated at 36W, but is is as warm as 36W 4ft fluorescent tube, only slightly warmer than room temperature. Even if they had terribly inefficient phosphorus that absorbs more UV than it converts it should be a lot warmer, right? Electronic ballast should be warm too if it really gives 36 watts, but it's not warm at all.
My conclusion is that these CFLs use only about 10-15W, and that the Chinese only stamp higher numbers to trick people into thinking that their lamps are good. What do you think about this?
The reason that I'm making all this fuss is that I could really use about dozen of cheap CFLs even if they are dim (desk lamps, closets...), but if they consume the amount of power that is stamped on them, then it has no point. I have no easy way of measuring the power, I have only two multimeters, but none of them can measure AC current (and then there's power factor...).
Btw, I'm from Serbia, and I think that these crappy CFLs are only exported into crappy countries like mine, I don't think you can buy them in any normal country.