81
New Theories / Re: Does GR laid the foundation for new ether?
« on: 04/12/2022 16:28:41 »Descartes has got a big doubt, how these magnets identify a like and unlike poles. He assumed that there is an invisible field with which these magnets are interacting and identifying it.This is all just a bunch of conjectures that is counter to all evidence and experimentation. Making stuff up that is not supported by the evidence is not science, it is pseudoscience.
This is not a feature or quality of magnets.
Space is not empty and it is completely filled with particles. It is completely wrong to say that magnet creates its field.
As assumed by Descartes, there is no place for magnet, like ordinary matter, it has to create its own. It pushes ether particles in the space. Due to attraction, more particles are attracted towards the magnet. So, it results in magnetic field.
Magnet = magnetic field (draws particles from space).
So, it clearly tells us that, ether or Luminiferous ether or light bearing ether is not hardest substance like steel. Further it also clearly tells us that there is direct relationship between magnet and aether.
Attraction of particles towards magnet clearly tells us that ether is spread every where in the space. It also gives us an idea that ether is not a separate substance or medium.
Magnetic field clearly tells us that ether consists of particles only.
As assumed by Lorentz, the condition of this aether at a place can be described by the electric field E and the magnetic field H, where these fields represent the "states" of the aether, with no further specification, related to the charges of the electrons.
Ok, if we move the magnet, its field is not lost. It clearly tells us that ether is so dense that it is very difficult to separate them.
However if we move the magnet at the speed of light, its field is lost. At that speed, it is very difficult for particles in the space to join magnet.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter