The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Why is the strangeness of a particle measured in negative but not positive?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why is the strangeness of a particle measured in negative but not positive?

  • 1 Replies
  • 4465 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spook1456 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 20
  • Activity:
    0%
  • we all like science do we not?
    • View Profile
Why is the strangeness of a particle measured in negative but not positive?
« on: 17/04/2011 06:42:24 »
I know that particles containing strange anti quarks have their strangeness measured in positive but why do  strange paritcles have their strangeness measured in negative for example
Particle symbol        Strangeness
κ‾ (kaon)                ‾1
Ω‾                       ‾3
Λ°                       ‾1
Σ‾                       ‾1
Ξ‾                       ‾2
Ξ°                       ‾2
« Last Edit: 17/04/2011 06:44:53 by spook1456 »
Logged
SPOOK1456 [;)]
 



Offline JP

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3346
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • View Profile
Why is the strangeness of a particle measured in negative but not positive?
« Reply #1 on: 17/04/2011 14:18:44 »
I don't know the details, but I trust wikipedia on this one:
Quote
The terms strange and strangeness predate the discovery of the quark, and were adopted after its discovery in order to preserve the continuity of the phrase; strangeness of anti-particles being referred to as +1, and particles as −1 as per the original definition. For all the quark flavor quantum numbers (strangeness, charm, topness and bottomness) the convention is that the flavor charge and the electric charge of a quark have the same sign. With this, any flavor carried by a charged meson has the same sign as its charge.
so particles can have both positive and negative strangeness. 
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How to convert LDL cholesterol concentration to LDL particle concentration?

Started by scientizschtBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 1
Views: 1185
Last post 26/06/2020 11:18:52
by Bored chemist
Can fundamental energies be combined to give wave-particle energies?

Started by Richard777Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 3363
Last post 30/07/2017 10:08:02
by Bored chemist
Does Lenard's particle structure of light negate the coherency of a light wave.

Started by alright1234Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 31
Views: 4479
Last post 24/05/2019 07:35:10
by Bored chemist
If a single viral particle can multiply in the body, how cells make someone sick

Started by melaniejsBoard COVID-19

Replies: 1
Views: 2125
Last post 09/04/2020 19:23:11
by set fair
Does a charged particle moving at 95% of the speed of light emit radiation?

Started by Ron HughesBoard General Science

Replies: 3
Views: 5351
Last post 18/01/2011 18:29:25
by imatfaal
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.092 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.