The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Can the speed of light be interpreted as representing a static vacuum?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Can the speed of light be interpreted as representing a static vacuum?
0 Replies
1483 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
imetheman
(OP)
Jr. Member
31
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Can the speed of light be interpreted as representing a static vacuum?
«
on:
14/08/2018 02:56:53 »
The following scenario is an integral part of a theory which describes a model of physical reality which incorporates an alternative interpretation of the standard model of physics. This proposed model offers an explanation for the appearance and cause of the singularity which initiated the Big Bang of our universe. And also why the moment of the appearance of the singularity represents the beginning of the space-time of the observable universe.
The following statements describes physical reality as defined by the principles incorporated in the model [and which therefore assume that the principles are correct], as opposed to the description of physical reality as currently defined by the standard model.
The first assumption is that at the centre nucleus of every atom of matter, there exists a notional shell/sphere having a diameter of 2 Planck lengths. This shell has a lifespan in physical reality of 1 Planck second. The region of the universe which occurs within the nucleus of the Planck shell/sphere, 'exists' outwith the calculable time and space by which physicists measure physical reality.
The centre nucleus of this 2 Planck diameter shell represents an infinitely small point coordinate in space time. Unlike the notional shell which surrounds the point coordinate [which has a lifespan of 1 Planck second,and which therefore has an existence in physical reality], the point coordinate has zero existence in time. From the perspective of being an external observer who or which exists in the time and space of physical reality, then to all intents and purposes, the point coordinate will always be measured as representing a static point in both time and space. (It is important to note at this juncture that the static point coordinate has zero mass and energy}.
What causes the formation of the notional 2 Planck length diameter shell at the nucleus of the atom? If we interpret the velocity of the speed of light as representing nothing more than the distance travelled of 1 Planck length over a period of 1 Planck second, and that it is impossible to transfer information faster than the speed of light, then we know that if it is at all possible for this hypothetical notional shell to exist at all, it's formation can only occur after 1 Planck second.
If we regard the moment that the point coordinate occurs as representing zero in time and space, then the radius of the shell will therefore have to be 1 Planck length = 2 PL diameter. 1 Planck second after the formation of the 1st shell, the next possible notional shell which can form will have a diameter of 4 Planck lengths. 1 PL later, the next possible shell will have a diameter of 6 PL..... etc. This synchronous relationship of time and space represents the metronome by which every physical phenomena in the universe can be explained. This expansion of notional Planck shells propagates radially out from the centre nucleus into infinity.
The inherent implication of this principle is that the transfer of information at the sub-atomic Planck scale can only occur in increments of 1 Planck second. The principle explains why physical reality at the sub-atomic Planck scale is quantised.
Since the formation of the 1st Planck shell can only occur 1 Planck shell after the moment of the occurrence of the centre nucleus, the latter therefore already exists 1 PS in the past of the shell. Although the point nucleus represents a static point in space-time, the incremental Planck shells which radiate out from the static point, continue to exist in time and space nonetheless.
The next assumption is that gravity does not move matter directly, but rather that gravity can only move the coordinate which exists at the nucleus of every atom of matter. The movement of the relative position of the centre point coordinate of an atom of matter in 3D space, results in the creation of a coordinate at a new position in 3D space. The model proposes that the notional shells which form around any given new point coordinate represents the source of a gravitational pulse. Any given Planck shell represents the physical manifestation of the gravitational pulse which propagates out from the source.
Whenever the shell of any given gravitational pulse intersects with a coordinate which is occupied by an atom of matter, the standard model interprets and describes the occurrence of the incident as representing the creation of a photon at that coordinate. However, the interpretation of the event according to the proposed model is that the gravitational pulse has moved the position of the centre coordinate of the atom [not the atom itself]. This results in the creation of a new position of the coordinate in 3D space [and therefore also the subsequent creation of a new gravitational pulse which radiates out from the new source at the speed of light].
In this revised interpretation, the event of the intersection of a gravity pulse shell with a coordinate in 3D space which is occupied by an atom of matter, the incident can now be described as the moment that a graviton moved the static position of the coordinate centre nucleus of the atom to a new position in 3D space - therefore creating a new gravity pulse source. 1 Planck second after the creation of the source coordinate, the latter immediately becomes a past event and therefore ceases to exist in time and space - but the gravity pulse shells from the source however, continue to propagate radially out for eternity into the infinite external 3D space. This is contrary to the standard model which interprets the incident as a photon hitting an electron and resulting in the creation of another photon.
As such, this proposed model postulates that if you follow the path of a graviton/photon back in time, it will ultimately lead you back to the point coordinate source of the pulse which it will be found, doesn't exist in time and space. This fact explains the reason why the observable universe appears to have began with an initial singularity.
However, this proposed model differs from the interpretation of the standard model in that the latter proposes that the singularity which occured at the beginning of the universe must possess an infinite density, whilst this proposed alternative model of physical reality states that the singularity at the beginning of the universe has zero mass and energy.
It is 3AM where I am, so I'm going to bed now. I'll finish this post hopefully tomorrow. Meanwhile however, please feel free to comment on what I have already written.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...