Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Please rate this post too:I rate this as false. A galaxy is not a nebula. A nebula is a relatively tiny volume of gas or dust that is located within a galaxy.
The statement that galaxies diverge does not stand up to criticism, because a galaxy is a nebula behind which there are single stars.
They are interconnected.I agree, the connection is that they are all nonsense.
I looked this up, and can't find any mention from scientists about the sun changing colors. Have I been trolled here?Yes, they are teasing you or possibly they're nuts.
My OP merely pointed out that there may be other contributing factors, which it is surprising to note, have not received the notice due them.It is not surprising at all considering that the "other contributing factors" you talk about are directly counter to established physics. If you had a better understanding of physics you would see that your ideas are seriously flawed.
I'd be marked down as being condescending & possibly banned.Oops! I'm sorry, I screwed up and thought I was responding to cpu68 (who's definitely a crackpot). You generally ask good questions and seem reasonable to me.
On second thoughts, they might, but won't say it out loud, cause of fear of being called a crackpot.Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure everyone already thinks you're a crackpot.
I'd like to discuss this, but we both will be tagged as loonies!
Strictly speaking your statement is not true.I disagree.
Therefore, it should be clear from the above that for an experiment to be viable,I was talking about theories.
They are also the right size for diffracting light in a direction orthogonal to the lines of molecules. Therefore, the physical explanation of the linear polarisation of light (as used in the 3 polariser experiment) is much as I had described in the OP. Since the polarisers diffract light in an orthogonal direction, a diagonally oriented polariser would diffract light diagonally.You are simply repeating your claims without evidence.
As far as proofs of quantum mechanics goes, the 3 polariser experiment may be considered to be the ace in the hole.Theories such as quantum mechanics are never "proven", theories are considered viable if they are consistent with observation and experimentation.
However, there is a simpler explanation if one looks at the polariser as a diffraction grating.Quantum mechanics explains the 3 polarizers results. It also gives the exact intensity of light that results. This means that the quantum theory is a good theory to use in this situation.
This does not make sense.Your inability to understand a theory does not make the theory wrong, it just means you don't understand.
It should depend on the evidenceWhy do you think every university teaches that?? It's because of the evidence supports it.
is this more or less how time dilation actually works?No.
How do you count them?With a Photomultiplier.
The experiment shows that there is no such thing as individual photons in EM radiation.Well I guess Einstein's estate will have to return his Nobel prize then. I mean who should we believe, every university that has a physics department or a random Youtube, wait!! I know we can ask a chatbot...
When asked about the size of photons, Gemini answered:I have no idea who Gemini is, I was wondering what you think.
No problem, just look at the door on any microwave oven, a fine grating or mesh is provided. Usually the mesh is much smaller than the microwave radiation that is being shielded or about 1mm in size is normal as compared to the 12 cm size microwave.
You should understand that I referred to transversal size, not length. Why microwave is trapped inside microwave oven, while visible light can escape through the metal mesh?These guys have no idea what they are talking about, that is, there ideas are made up in there own minds without evidence. I just want anyone reading this to understand that these 2 posters are doing pseudoscience.
But experiments clearly show that wavelength of EM waves determines their size of influence in space.Great. Could you please provide a link to one of these experiments?
You can do the experiment yourself.So you couldn't find any citations that support your idea that the frequency of a photon's magnetic and electric fields somehow dictate it's size. Imagine my surprise.
Don't depend too much on the authority.Don't worry yourself, I don't. I suppose you don't go to the doctor when your sick because that would be appealing to authority?
Light only travels at c through vacuum. In other media, it travels slower, and the wavelength reduced accordingly, with the same frequency. It does have something to do with length, as the name correctly suggests.I contend that you are 100% wrong.
But for some reason everything happens the other way around.Do you have evidence of this?