0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Do you have an explanation of how the polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA, came to be in SARS-Cov2?Apparently the RmYN02 sequence has no basic amino acids.
Quote from: Jolly2 on 11/12/2020 23:48:33Do you have an explanation of how the polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA, came to be in SARS-Cov2?Apparently the RmYN02 sequence has no basic amino acids.https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/was-the-mers-virus-a-model-for-the-creation-of-covid-19-335487
An interesting question is the origin of the furin cleavage site it SARS-CoV-2. Its closest relative, the bat isolate RaTG13, does not have this site. Nor do any of the other bat SARS-like CoVs or the pangolin CoVs that have been isolated. However recently a newly isolated bat SARS-like CoV, RmYN02, was shown to contain a poly basic amino acid insertion in the spike glycoprotein. This observation supports the hypothesis that the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 arose by recombination among bat viruses in nature.
https://www.virology.ws/2020/05/14/sars-cov-2-furin-cleavage-site-revisited/QuoteAn interesting question is the origin of the furin cleavage site it SARS-CoV-2. Its closest relative, the bat isolate RaTG13, does not have this site. Nor do any of the other bat SARS-like CoVs or the pangolin CoVs that have been isolated. However recently a newly isolated bat SARS-like CoV, RmYN02, was shown to contain a poly basic amino acid insertion in the spike glycoprotein. This observation supports the hypothesis that the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 arose by recombination among bat viruses in nature.
Thanks, I was trying to find this. I think "supports" is a bit strong. I don't think anyone knows enough to weigh such evidence. Virologiy has made great strides in just a century but there is a vast amount yet to be uncovered
9 February — Nimble coronaviruses could leap straight from bats to humansSome coronaviruses found in bats could jump directly to people without the need for further evolution in an intermediate animal host.Victor Garcia at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and his colleagues implanted mice with human lung tissue and infected the tissue with various coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 and two closely related coronaviruses isolated from bats. All of the viruses could efficiently multiply in the lung tissue (A. Wahl et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03312-w; 2021). The findings suggest that coronaviruses circulating in bats could directly infect people, and have the potential to cause the next pandemic.
smoking gun, for a lab created virus?
if you found someone's name encoded into the DNA, that would be a give-away
I think "supports" is a bit strong.
I don't think anyone knows enough to weigh such evidence.
I am sure that lots of entities, be they individuals, small groups, mega cults, . . . have been inspired by the devastation of covid-19 that biological methods of attack can be very cheap, easy to make, devastating, and difficult to trace who did it.
A new team took over, with better ties to the country of the virus origin.
It is hard to find the running totals now.
it allowed last minute changes to formerly strict American election laws, that allowed a long shot candidate to win,
His pushing the vaccine in record time
Quote from: Edwina Lee on 07/04/2020 07:46:58I am sure that lots of entities, be they individuals, small groups, mega cults, . . . have been inspired by the devastation of covid-19 that biological methods of attack can be very cheap, easy to make, devastating, and difficult to trace who did it. The state of play now is: a killer virus would be of use to China but an own goal for the West or Russia to deploy. I'm not pointing the finger at China, just saying.
If the virus was released intentionally there is certianly evidence that the elites in the west have completely benefitted from it.
If the virus was released intentionally there is certianly evidence that the elites in the west have completely benefitted from it. Just saying.