1

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is light bent whent it passes a massive body in the space?

« on: 14/02/2021 16:52:05 »

Photons have an inertial mass and a delayed gravitational mass. Gravitational perturbations travel at the speed of light. What we call massive particles cannot reach the speed of light. For a photon, its gravitational mass is totally redshifted in its direction of motion. That's why light bends twice as much as massive particles, because it has no massive counter field in its direction of motion.

2

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Why is light bent whent it passes a massive body in the space?

« on: 14/02/2021 16:17:43 »

Gravitational mass bend space-time not space.

3

New Theories / Re: Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 09/02/2021 15:37:29 »

Hayseed, all your theories about the particles do not agree with experiments. I encourage you to learn about what actually has been measured and how before you continue in this direction. It is hopeless. It doesn`t mean our science is perfect. But I must admit group thinking leads often to fallacies...

4

New Theories / Re: Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 09/02/2021 15:29:25 »

Puppypower, the increasing entropy being a static law is a fallacy that can be easily disproved. First, the entropy is a global phenomena which is not well understood. Second, the increase in entropy being a fundamental law violates the conservation of information because it implies a creation of information from nothing. The fact that the Universe allows logical computations and that the logical parts are also a part of the Universe, indicates that there are no infinities. This is the Universe itself which does the computation. Logic doesn`t work with infinities. Mathematics using infinities just replace infinities with finite values to get a seeming logic. Infinity is not a real number and it is incomputable, therefore the entropy cannot increase forever.

The entropy increases because of the expansion, not the other way around. The second law of thermodynamics at the scale of the entire Universe is just a belief. It should not be a law! The only possible models conserving information and allowing computation are cyclical...

5

New Theories / Re: Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 07/02/2021 22:58:30 »

so as particles are sucked into the black hole at its equator they are forced  out at the slowly spinning equators?

That's what I think but still outside of the black hole outer horizon. According to the standard explanation, it is produced outside the minimal stable orbit if I remember correctly.

6

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is the Compton equation a Lorentz probability ratio?

« on: 07/02/2021 17:50:20 »

The Compton equation gives you the change in the wavelength. There is no probability involved. It is a result. If you want to link it to a spatial probability distribution it is up to you but explain why you use one dimension and give more context. From what and where are you going?

7

New Theories / Re: Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 07/02/2021 13:51:23 »

From the point of view of my theory, a multiverse seems unnecessary. But the compression of matter in a black hole recycles the excess of electric charges and creates the jets. It depends on how much matter and dark matter fall in and at which point they combine. So, no it is not arriving into our universe, but yes, there is a contribution to the expansion of the universe through the radiation process.

8

New Theories / Re: What is inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 06/02/2021 17:50:58 »

Entanglement is a proof that the Universe is finite. The discrepancies between observation and the calculated value of the vacuum energy is caused by the inclusion of extra imaginary particles. The unitarity of the wave function includes all particles of the Universe in an entanglement summation which is always equal to one for the particles considered with all its external relations. For example, two electrons may only be maximally entangled at 1/2 or if you prefer, 50%, meaning there is a leftover of 50% of entanglement with all other particles in the Universe which conserves unitarity, energy and momentum.

When a measure is done, the position of the detector influences the result because the measured particle becomes highly entangled with it. When the detector is at 90 degrees from the maximally 50% entangled dual relation you only measure some of the 50% leftover of the rest of the Universe! In the perfect cases, the detectors entanglement enhances the measurement by a factor of 2, from 25% when both detectors are perpendicular to each other up to 50% when they are aligned or anti-aligned (from 25%+25% up to 50%+50%). More on that later. Just remember that entanglement relations depend on the distance. As both particles approach the detectors, the detectors become entangled with the particles from the bottom up, keeping the maximally entangled dual relation of both particles intact until they reach the detectors, assuming sufficient starting distances for a valid approximation of the detectors at infinity from the particles to get an enhancement factor of two. Thus, if everything is aligned or anti-aligned the leftover becomes insignificant compared to the detectors relations with the system. The detectors have consumed most of the 50% bottom relations and the leftover is insignificant and you get what appears to be a 100% entanglement relation between both particles though it is just 50% in reality.

The increase in entropy is not fundamental. Every Planck time, new connections are formed as the Universe expands and more particles are created, that's all. It is still limited by the speed of light. The entropy is the number of degrees of freedom. This allows the increase in complexity and the evolution of life... The brain seems to be a natural extension.

9

New Theories / Re: What is inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 06/02/2021 15:32:55 »

If one basic thing to understand any collapse is that only the EM field allows repulsion then why the Universe is expanding...?

Yes!

Dark matter is a necessary ingredient.

And a Universe with infinities would not allow logical computations, taking everything into account while keeping a realist point of view. Who is foolish enough to pretend the Universe is not real? Even if we were in a computer it would be real...

Some particles have no mass if there are no infinities.

10

New Theories / Re: What is inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 06/02/2021 14:06:21 »

No, the collapse is standard but what you are saying is pretty interesting, you might be right but it seems forbidden... In my theory, the only possible true black hole is the static one, the black hole at both ends. What we call black holes are not true black holes because there is no total collapse yet, no singularity. The thing is any black hole in the Universe has a rotation relative to its external entanglement with the rest of the Universe. It cannot be zero, though it may be near zero potentially. The Higgs field is the hidden continuity made of straight lines. All fields are one dimensional and they are made of spacetime, the Higgs, the EM and the gravitational or Einstein field. Massive particles are intersections of these three fields. They are spinors. The standard spacetime is just the prolongation of the particles (à la quantum field theory). The connection between gravity and EM is perpendicular. The electric charge is emergent from the pressure of the flow of EM spacetime due to its curvature in the spinor... Only the EM connection relative to the detector in a relation with the rest of the Universe is an observable, that's why electrons appear to have no size... and why it's not the case for protons having three quarks...

One basic thing to understand any collapse is that only the EM field allows repulsion...

It is a real and deterministic Universe allowing a continuity while you have a quantization at the same time. It explains why we are stuck with probabilities in practice. We may only measure the quantization part and infer the continuity because it is a necessary complement. Then it becomes real...

11

New Theories / Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? or MC Squared theory.

« on: 06/02/2021 02:18:17 »

Note: This topic was split off from: https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=81590.0 Did the universe begin life inside a black hole? - moderator.

If the Universe was inside a black hole, it was the black hole itself, whatever a black hole is.

My two cents theory:

All black holes inside the Universe are rotating. In a black hole, matter is organized in a very simplified way, information is conserved in an equivalent of folding. There is matter, which is spacetime itself, from the inner horizon up to the outer horizon. Only when all the Universe forms a single black hole, the inner horizon vanishes The black hole stops rotating and we get a singularity of the Higgs field. There is no singularity of the EM field nor of the gravitational field. Every bit of information is its own center and its singularity, and it is connected with every other bits of the Universe in a kind of causal set, only once with the EM field and also only once with the gravitational field. The Higgs field produces a flat space with a finite horizon but your horizon is unreachable because it moves with you while it is expanding or contracting. Asymmetries are the fundamentals. There is an unstable quasi-static black hole at both ends. Time has only one direction.

Inflation doesn't need a special energy, it is caused by the gravitational blue shift of massive particles vs the expansion of the surrounding vacuum energy in an early phase. The speed of light is constant everywhere. Time is absolute but the passage of time is relative. This is the wavelength that is changing. You must take account of the expanding horizon to solve special relativity.

Elementary particles are spinors of EM spacetime intersecting the gravitational spacetime. All elementary particles have an electric charge, including the neutrinos. Neutrinos wavelength oscillates near more massive particles and they only interact at three specific wavelengths (the value of the electric charge oscillates and they become virtually interactionless). The electron tunnel effect is the same mechanism... Dirac wins.

The expansion may be represented by a lagging gravitational field behind the EM field. Matter is positively charged when highly compressed because the electron wavelength is longer than those of the proton constituents. As the Universe is cyclical, you need a negatively charged counterpart which should have its own Higgs. This counterpart is also related to the second and third families of particles through the W and Z bosons. This is Dark Matter. Dark matter only interacts with ordinary matter in the EM spacetime field near the static black hole. The Higgs produces all elementary particles. This is the basic quantization number. Its mass = proton mass divided by the fine structure constant with corrections due to the W and Z. The neutrinos are key parts to understand.

There could be two families of Dark matter with two beautiful Higgs particles. Unfortunately, they are only observables through gravity... In the contrary, why would the second and third families be unstable? At what point the second and third families become stable bits of information and why? Where the multiple Higgs meet each other.

Every time an experiment verifies entanglement relations it is also a demonstration of the Higgs field. Remember that the Higgs field is faster than light, which means it is a synchronization field, not an energy field. All particles of the Universe are entangled (at least for each individual type of matter-DM) in a complex quantized relation, which means detectors are a key part of the solution.

The volume of the Universe is proportional to the number of particles in it. If there is no new particle produced, the Universe collapse. This includes gravitons, that's why it is the volume and not the surface... The Universe must reach a maximum size because there are no infinities...!!!

Gluons are gravitons. A graviton is made of two gluons because it is a dual relation.

12

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Does anyone have a new idea, based on facts?

« on: 03/11/2020 04:05:20 »

How do you know it is a mad house? When the most realistic guy in the house is still believing in fairy tales...

A more serious one for Yor_on, how could the Universe be infinite and logic still be working in this infinite Universe?

13

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How does past, present, future exist at once? What is block universe?

« on: 29/10/2020 08:12:13 »

To answer questions 1 and 2, you need to understand two basic principles.

The first principle is the principle of relative simultaneity due to the limited maximum speed of energy transfer, the speed of light in the vacuum. From the point of view of Einstein, this is the limit of causality. Therefore, two simultaneous events are relative to your place in space and time. Think of two different observers looking at lightnings and one sees two of them at the same time while the other sees them happening one after the other. As it is define as the speed of causality, it implies that there is no definite simultaneity.

The second principle is the conservation of information which can be related to the conservation of energy, though they are not necessarily equal. This principle just says that the information of the structure of the universe cannot be destroyed. It means that if you have the mathematical solution to the entire universe and a complete set of variables and parameters, you can predict the future and reconstruct the past (supposing you have the right computer).

According to Einstein, and this is probably true, if you could see the entire Universe from your own perspective and take a picture of it and you learn from it all information content of every particles and pieces of it, you could know everything, past and future. But it is true for any observer, even though their passage of time is different. As there is no preferred spatial coordinate or time, you cannot distinguish what is real and what is not apart from your own perspective. When you consider that all massive particles are observers and they have all their own perspective which must be equally real, then you have the Block Universe. Remember that you must exclude the possibility of an absolute time reference, an absolute simultaneity and faster than light causality. General Relativity does not respect the principle of the conservation of information due to the singularity at the center of black holes in his equations. Einstein knew his theory was not complete and no black holes were observed at the time. Most physicists think information is conserved and there is a limit and therefore no real singularity. Personally, I think Einstein went too far by eliminating these possibilities and the necessary limits are the keys to find the correct answer. The now has a special meaning in cosmology, this is where the symmetry of the expansion is conserved and energy is always conserved locally in General Relativity.

14

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What is the 3D shape with the maximum surface area?

« on: 26/08/2020 21:45:54 »

What is the best design for a heatsink?

15

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Frictionless Cogs

« on: 25/08/2020 04:54:14 »

It depends on your definition of friction. If you look at the details, I'm right. Though I don't disagree with Bored Chemist with his practical point of view. But if you look down the rabbit hole, you will find that the classical definition hits a floor of contradictions...

16

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Frictionless Cogs

« on: 24/08/2020 18:04:37 »

To speak of a frictionless floor or cogs is unphysical. Only a frictionless dark matter is possible. Matter would pass through this dark matter without any friction but gravity would still apply. If the floor stops you, it is not frictionless.

17

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?

« on: 07/08/2020 15:01:03 »

I say fundamentally, it is not statistical and I have a possible example.

18

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?

« on: 07/08/2020 13:57:23 »

Thank you Jarek, you helped me to understand my point further.

Yes, if you take a neutral plasma, statistically you have a repulsion maintaining the density of the plasma according to the temperature and pressure. But at high densities, the experiment defies the theory. The calculations used are mostly empirical rather than completely theoretical. Why a neutron star has a magnetic field that strong? What is dark energy? When the density is low, both charges are equal because it respects the minimal distance but when you compress further, an asymmetry of the charge is produced. I say add electrons or muons in your plasma to help your fusion in fusion reactors. If you can...

19

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Can windmills affect Earth's rotation?

« on: 03/08/2020 22:23:18 »

In a meteorological course, I remember to have predicted a counter wind at very high altitude to compensate for the wind we are usually seeing for the weather and airplane flights. I told myself the wind directions are due to the coriolis force, evaporation, convection, pressure, temperature and terrain friction. I told myself the solar wind should be negligible. Everybody was skeptic. One day we saw the wind of the upper atmosphere in realtime on a meteorological site and there it was, a uniform thin layer going all in the opposite direction of the general direction of the lower atmosphere.

The solar wind has not a big effect on the net rotation of the earth's wind.

20

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Can windmills affect Earth's rotation?

« on: 03/08/2020 22:04:35 »

In my opinion, you can only transfer some momentum if the solar win has a net effect on the net wind direction of rotation and it will depend where you put your windmill. Tides also.