0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Why are black holes devoid of energy, light and heat?While it is clear that black holes are devoid of light and heat, because otherwise they would be decidedly more 'observable' in space...Isn't it a mathematical consequence of General Relativity that black holes are devoid of energy?
This being the reason for the black hole contravention of the second law of thermodynamics and conservation of energy law...How can it be that the reference frames in the universe that have the largest masses at the highest density of compression, are cold and lacking in energy?Is this because General Relativity states time to be running faster, and energy to be greater in open space than it is where there is mass?Looking at why GR is stating this as being so, we arrive at the fact of a clock ticking faster at h from M...Is there any other reason why GR should calculate time running faster in open space than it does near mass?
Looking at this calculation for attributing open space with a faster time, will placing a clock at h from M be measuring time in open space, or will placing a clock in space just be measuring what time is doing for m at h from M?
As an experiment, let's imagine that GR has got this calculation wrong. That by placing a measuring device in open space in order to measure open space, that the measuring device, the clock, has changed open space into m in space, and that it is time for m in space that is being measured by the clock, and not the rate of time for open space itself.
ou can only measure energy by tick rate
Let's look at the situation reversed.Let's examine what the remit would be for a black hole where time runs really fast and that it is open space where time runs slow...How would this change the calculations of what occurs for and surrounding black holes?
Just measuring energy density content in space. Time is just a measurement of energy
However it is one of the most ridiculous things that I have ever heard of, this notion that 'open space' will have more energy than bodies of clumped mass
Why are black holes devoid of energy?
Why are black holes devoid light and heat?
the mystery of why the mass accreted there in the first place
Since energy is conserved, some of the energy (and mass) of the original star ends up inside the black hole.
Quote from: evan_au on 12/03/2017 10:28:27Since energy is conserved, some of the energy (and mass) of the original star ends up inside the black hole.Due to quantum tunnelling. GR forbids penetration in the classical sense and cannot accommodate mass inside a black hole without violating causality and turning the concept of time into something completely foreign to our senses.
What you are not taking into account is the increase in relativistic mass of approaching objects and the cancellation of gravity that arises close to the black hole. It is necessary to use an inertia tensor in this situation.