The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?

  • 15 Replies
  • 1963 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« on: 02/08/2020 09:13:38 »
Time/CPT symmetry is at heart of many models of physics, like unitary evolution in quantum mechanics, or Lagrangian formalism we use from classical mechanics, electromagnetism, up to general relativity and quantum field theories.
In theory we should be able to decompose any scenario (history of the Universe?) into ensemble of Feynman diagrams, apply CPT symmetry to all of them, getting CPT analogue of entire scenario (?)

There are many QM-based experiments which kind of use time symmetry (?), for example (slides with links):
Wheeler experiment, delayed choice quantum eraser (DCQE), “asking photons where they have been”, “photonic quantum routers”, Shor algorithm as more sophisticated DCQE.

However, this symmetry is quite nonintuitive, very difficult to really accept – mainly due to irreversibly, thermodynamical counterarguments (are there other reasons?)
Can e.g. this conflict with 2nd law of thermodynamics be resolved by just saying that symmetry of fundamental theories can be broken on the level of solution, like throwing a rock into symmetric lake surface?
Are all processes reversible? (e.g. wavefunction collapse, measurement)

So is our world time/CPT symmetric?
What does it mean?

Personally I interpret it that we live in 4D spacetime, (Einstein's) block universe/eternalism: only travel through some solution (history of the universe) already found in time/CPT symmetric way, like the least action principle or Feynman path/diagram ensemble - is it the proper way to understand this symmetry?
Are there other ways to interpret it?

« Last Edit: 02/08/2020 11:44:52 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 46938
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #1 on: 02/08/2020 12:44:45 »
You should define what CPT symmetry is Jarek as that is from where this question seem to arise. And CPT is a broken symmetry as I understands it. Using a Feynman diagram it do seems as if time is a symmetry though. You could put it as a question of the logic holding the universe together would hold for it running backwards, if it is time you speculate over?

https://www2.lbl.gov/nsd/education/ABC/wallchart/chapters/05/2.html
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #2 on: 02/08/2020 13:20:01 »
CPT symmetry is required for QFT like the Standard Model - from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPT_symmetry
Quote
The CPT theorem says that CPT symmetry holds for all physical phenomena, or more precisely, that any Lorentz invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian must have CPT symmetry.

The question is how should we understand it?

The basic understanding is that any Feynman diagram can be transformed this way: applying spatial, temporal symmetry and replacing particles with antiparticles ...
... antiparticles "traveling back in time": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiparticle#Feynman%E2%80%93Stueckelberg_interpretation

But in theory we should be able to decompose any scenario into Feynaman diagrams, apply CPT, getting CPT analogue of entire scenario ...
Cannot we imagine History of the Universe this way?

For me the only way to understand it is through living in spacetime/block universe which was originally solved in CPT-symmetric way like the least action principle, Feynman path/diagram ensembles.
It is also called eternalism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternalism_(philosophy_of_time)

That e.g. thermodynamical (effective) breaking of this symmetry is only a property of the solution - like symmetry of lake surface broken by throwing a rock.
This "rock" for our Universe seems the Big Bang - where everything was localized, so entropy should be low (?)

The question to discuss here is if it is the proper understanding?
Are there other ways to see it?

ps. Slides with lots of links and diagrams: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0zl18yttgnpc52w/causality.pdf
Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 46938
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #3 on: 02/08/2020 15:18:48 »
I don't know Jarek. What I do know is that your mind is a living thing, It search and it question. Keep it that way, it would be a pleasure to meet you.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #4 on: 02/08/2020 15:28:47 »
We have QM Foundations & Nature of Time seminar, e.g. Kenneth Wharton has recently talked about time symmetry as the source of quantum nonintuitiveness: http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/QMFNoT
You can join if wanting to discuss, also talks are welcomed.
Logged
 



Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 46938
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 99 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #5 on: 02/08/2020 15:47:17 »
You know one thing Jarek. The impression I've gained from Einstein isn't that he was dogmatic. He just used his mind., then he spent a lot of time defending his ideas, trying them to become mathematically explainable. Nobody's perfect, nor me or you. But your mind is a different thing, when you use it, it shines.
« Last Edit: 02/08/2020 15:51:48 by yor_on »
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #6 on: 02/08/2020 16:28:28 »
Thanks, seeing time-symmetry as the source of nonintuitiveness of quantum mechanics is an old concept:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_vector_formalism

I got to this conclusion more than a decade ago by studying MERW - which explains why standard diffusion disagrees with physics: only approximates the maximal entropy principle crucial for statistical physics models.
Repairing this approximation, using time-symmetric random walk, this disagreement disappears:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximal_entropy_random_walk

I recommend looking closer at quantum experiments directly exploiting time symmetry, like:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed-choice_experiment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed-choice_quantum_eraser
Logged
 

Offline Jaaanosik

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 569
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #7 on: 03/08/2020 04:31:39 »
Jarek,
Here is a quote:
Quote
Electromagnetism, gravity and the strong interaction all obey C-symmetry, but weak interactions violate C-symmetry.
From here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-symmetry
Please, can you elaborate on the cause why weak interactions violate C-symmetry?
Thanks,
Jano
Logged
 

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #8 on: 03/08/2020 06:53:50 »
Time symmetry is satisfied e.g. in electromagnetism, gravity and quantum mechanics.
In standard model it is more subtle - for which it is believed that applying this symmetry also requires to apply C and P - personally I am not so certain of "kaons decay in two ways, hence CP is violated" types of conclusions, but this is for a completely different discussion.

Let us focus on time symmetry here, if needed combined with CP.

For example: are there possible CPT analogues of any phenomena?
E.g. of laser - which stimulated emission causes excitation of target later.
Is CPT analogue of laser possible? If so, shouldn't its stimulated absorption cause deexcitation of (constantly excited like lamp) target earlier?
For free electron laser building its CPT analogue seems quite straightforward ...

« Last Edit: 03/08/2020 09:19:46 by Jarek Duda »
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10428
  • Activity:
    26.5%
  • Thanked: 1254 times
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #9 on: 03/08/2020 10:46:31 »
Quote from: Jarek Duda
Is CPT analogue of laser possible?
I don't think so.

The clue is in the metastable state that lases.
- The laser medium has a ground state
- You have to pump the laser medium up to an energy level which is too unstable to lase (it doesn't hang around long enough)
- But this unstable state decays into a metastable state which doesn't readily decay by itself. This decay is dissipated as heat.
- Most of the laser medium has to be in this metastable state before lasing can occur (a population inversion)
      - If too many atoms are in the ground state, they will just absorb any laser output before it has time to build up a coherent resonance.
      - This part of the process is certainly reversible!
- The metastable state stays around long enough to be triggered by a passing photon of the right frequency into emitting a photon of identical frequency and phase (stimulated emission of radiation).

The reason that illuminating a laser medium with light does not produce electricity + a cooling effect is:
- The incoming laser photons have the right energy to pump electrons from the ground state to the metastable state
- But they lack the energy to pump the electrons to the higher energy state - this would involve turning heat into orderly energy, which violates entropy
- Different lasers have different mechanisms for producing the metastable state- some laser diodes inject holes and electrons into the laser medium; to reverse this, thermal energy would have to cause random holes and electrons to undergo an orderly diffusion in opposite directions, again violating entropy.
- In general, turning a source of heat into useful energy has to battle the Carnot equation, which was the original basis of thermodynamics.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_diode#Direct_and_indirect_bandgap_semiconductors

In general, I think that interactions on a Feynman diagram with 2 particles on each side might be reversible.
- But by the time you get 3 or more particles on one side of the Feynman diagram, entropy holds the trump card.
- Because it is statistically unlikely that all 3 components would appear in the right place at the right time with the right energy to reverse the process.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Jarek Duda

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #10 on: 03/08/2020 11:04:36 »
evan_au,
while I also don't know how to realize CPT analogue of laser based on population inversion for 3/4 states ... for free electron laser it seems quite straightforward:



Quote
A free-electron laser (FEL) is a (fourth generation) synchrotron light source producing extremely brilliant and short pulses of synchrotron radiation. An FEL functions and behaves in many ways like a laser, but instead of using stimulated emission from atomic or molecular excitations, it employs relativistic electrons as a gain medium.[1][2] Synchrotron radiation is generated as a bunch of electrons passes through a magnetic structure (called undulator or wiggler). In an FEL, this radiation is further amplified as the synchrotron radiation re-interacts with the electron bunch such that the electrons start to emit coherently, thus allowing an exponential increase in overall radiation intensity.

It is just electrons traveling in alternating magnetic field.
Isn't its CPT analogue just positrons traveling in opposite direction?

ps. There is also "antilaser" concept, but it is a bit different: “coherent perfect absorber” https://www.wired.com/2010/07/antilaser/
Here we would like to get CPT analogue of excitation of target caused by laser: cause deexcitation of target ... which comes naturally from thermodynamics, but maybe we could make it faster with CPT analogue of laser?
« Last Edit: 03/08/2020 11:26:33 by Jarek Duda »
Logged
 

Offline CPT ArkAngel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 733
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #11 on: 03/08/2020 12:02:43 »
The problem of CPT symmetry in particle physics arises mainly due to an error in thinking that all electric charges are the same with the exception of their sign. The charge of the electron and the charge of the proton are not exactly the same. The minimal distances of interaction are different so the potential are the same at long distance but not at the minimum. But when you consider this, it is at the scale of the universe that there is an asymmetry. There is the same quantity of protons and electrons, but almost no positron  and no constituent of the antiproton. The total potential doesn't seem to be equal to zero...

CPT symmetry is about conservation. If you suppose no creation, but conservation. There must be a complement somewhere.
What is dark matter? Why does the universe expand... Why gravity is so weak? The complement does not interact with the electric charge of matter, only at the beginning and at the end of the process, where CPT is conserved.

Time CPT symmetry is either space or time.
« Last Edit: 03/08/2020 12:42:51 by CPT ArkAngel »
Logged
 

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #12 on: 03/08/2020 12:55:04 »
CPT ArkAngel,
As for throwing a rock into symmetric lake surface, or entropy growth, there is no problem with violating fundamental symmetries in the level of solution.

For entropy growth I would say the reason is that in Big Bang everything was localized, hence entropy was low - leading to observed entropy gradient/growth.

For baryon asymmetry, I would say it is statistical symmetry breaking: that symmetric situation is statistically repelling.
Like for e.g. L-amino acids in our life: while there is symmetry, the more one type of them, the easier development of life based on the same - making 1/2-1/2 statistically repelling, leading to nearly complete domination of one of them - originally chosen e.g. in a random way.

For baryon asymmetry we don't need CPT violation, it is sufficient to have this kind of statistical repelling.
For example that in baryogenesis:
"creation of proton is a bit more likely in presence of electron" plus symmetric
"creation of antiproton is a bit more likely in presence of positron"
such two symmetric rules would make that 1/2-1/2 matter-antimatter state is statistically repelling, leading to nearly complete domination of one of them, e.g. initially chosen in a random way.
Logged
 



Offline CPT ArkAngel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 733
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #13 on: 07/08/2020 13:57:23 »
Thank you Jarek, you helped me to understand my point further.

Yes, if you take a neutral plasma, statistically you have a repulsion maintaining the density of the plasma according to the temperature and pressure. But at high densities, the experiment defies the theory. The calculations used are mostly empirical rather than completely theoretical. Why a neutron star has a magnetic field that strong? What is dark energy? When the density is low, both charges are equal because it respects the minimal distance but when you compress further, an asymmetry of the charge is produced. I say add electrons or muons in your plasma to help your fusion in fusion reactors. If you can...
« Last Edit: 07/08/2020 14:24:03 by CPT ArkAngel »
Logged
 

Offline Jarek Duda (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 169
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #14 on: 07/08/2020 14:52:29 »
I don't think I follow?

The only topic-related question I have seen here is the dominance of matter, for which CPT violation is not necessary - other options are e.g.:
- fixed baryon number of the Universe - in Big Crunch preceding our Big Bang,
- statistical symmetry breaking - some positive feedback mechanism like above, making "the more of one type, the easier to get even more" - finally leading to domination of one type, which initially could be chosen at random, analogously to chirality of life.
Logged
 

Offline CPT ArkAngel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 733
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Re: What does it mean that physics is time - CPT symmetric?
« Reply #15 on: 07/08/2020 15:01:03 »
I say fundamentally, it is not statistical and I have a possible example.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: time symmetry  / cpt  / causality 
 

Similar topics (5)

Must ∞ monkeys on ∞ typewriters really write everything given ∞ time?

Started by chiralSPOBoard General Science

Replies: 28
Views: 29989
Last post 28/03/2020 11:42:26
by yor_on
We Know The Extent Of The Sun, What Is The Extent Of Space Time?

Started by TitanscapeBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 13957
Last post 27/04/2008 23:10:10
by turnipsock
What does "time-like" mean in the following sentence?

Started by scheradoBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 15
Views: 12959
Last post 09/02/2018 10:28:21
by Colin2B
If you could travel faster than light, could you travel in time?

Started by DmaierBoard Technology

Replies: 13
Views: 17515
Last post 19/03/2020 14:56:52
by Paul25
If the speed of light is constant, time must be constant too?

Started by Chuck FBoard General Science

Replies: 6
Views: 15550
Last post 17/09/2021 21:42:58
by Zer0
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.507 seconds with 66 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.