The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is the Compton equation a Lorentz probability ratio?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is the Compton equation a Lorentz probability ratio?

  • 1 Replies
  • 785 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Richard777 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 191
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Is the Compton equation a Lorentz probability ratio?
« on: 06/02/2021 20:37:14 »
The Compton Effect discovered in 1923 represents the interaction between a photon (x ray) and an electron. The interaction is elastic; the photon is “scattered”, and the electron “recoils”.

The Compton equation relates a ratio of momentum to a scattering angle.

The Compton equation also includes a “probability ratio”, or “distribution ratio” which is related to the Lorentz distribution function. Is this true?

See maths attached.

* 08 The Compton Distributiuon Ratio.pdf (195.35 kB - downloaded 64 times.)
Logged
 



Offline CPT ArkAngel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 733
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is the Compton equation a Lorentz probability ratio?
« Reply #1 on: 07/02/2021 17:50:20 »
The Compton equation gives you the change in the wavelength. There is no probability involved. It is a result. If you want to link it to a spatial probability distribution it is up to you but explain why you use one dimension and give more context. From what and where are you going?
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How to draw a structural equation for aqueous nitrate and free copper ions?

Started by ScienceBoard Chemistry

Replies: 3
Views: 1397
Last post 27/05/2021 18:43:03
by Eternal Student
What is the chemical equation for the rusting reaction of iron in salt water?

Started by cableguyBoard Chemistry

Replies: 3
Views: 29974
Last post 04/12/2012 06:30:42
by Kryptid
Does Einstein's equation E=MC^2 negate the idea of no travel faster than light?

Started by wadegardnerBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 29
Views: 16259
Last post 25/10/2015 20:31:16
by wadegardner
Can the Dirac equation be used to combine mass dilation and length contraction?

Started by Richard777Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 2532
Last post 04/10/2016 21:24:41
by Richard777
MOVED: “Can the Universal Constants be Derived Through a Single Continuous Equation?”

Started by KryptidBoard General Science

Replies: 0
Views: 999
Last post 10/10/2020 17:34:33
by Kryptid
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.112 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.