In many languages of the ancients, the sign of trident designates the mountains
The Egyptians described Atlantis as an island comprising mostly mountains in the northern portions (The map above proves same)
Phoenician, Etruscan, languages!I've been looking at your work. You seem to have done lots of thinking on many different subjects but I didn't see anything that couldn't be broken down into short pieces for discussion.
The floor shape and other evidences can prove that. I'm working for a long time, this is topic of debates. the forum page is too small for that! please read more about Atlantis. You will understand everything!
You have never dreamed to buy
Something like this book
Sir Isaac Newton
Galileo Galilei,
Aristotel (Αριστοτέλης)
Giordano Bruno
Rene Descartes
Albert Einshtain
Plato...
There had never been something like this book
on the table of the geniuses!
Vern I've written about the book E-mail.I received your email and replied; I don't have any secrets[:)] My website is here (http://photontheory.com/blogcms) [:)] My pix of the whole family is here (http://cabot-biz.com/pix/index.html)
Everything will be OK!
Please send link of your site, and your CV + Foto.
Answer send by E-mail only.
Thank you!
Good luck!
Plato was partially right!Are you getting that from Plato or is it some other work?
there is wrong story about war between Athenians and Atlantians!
During platinum age of Atlantis in the Greece was stone age 12500 years ago
Phoenician, Etruscan, languages!
Phoenician, Etruscan, languages!
Really? Can you show me anywhere that a trident appears in Etruscan scripts?
We have conclusive evidences about sages of Atlantis
You should be read more attentively Doctor Beaver; I’ve written “Atlantis was first developed culture. Each early developed culture had connection to the sages-missioners (spreaders of knowledge) from Atlantis (Egypt, Mesopotamia and Hindu-Sarasvati Civilization)”. Where are Greeks?
Thus first stage has ATLANTIS!
Second stage: Egypt, Mesopotamia and Hindu-Sarasvati.
Third stage: Canaanian, Phoenician, Minoan, Trojan(Wilusa), Mycenaean and other kingdoms of Greeks, Philistinian, Hebrews, Etruscian, Hittitian, Georgian-Iberian, etc.
Conclusive evidences are intellectual analysis a lot of threads.
Geo-forces are criminal forces,
Quite possible the Atlantis for Indian was land of "MU" None knows still!
I think 'criminal' implies intent.
SO, ATLANTIS IS TRUTH! I CAN'T UNDERSTAND!!! ))) WHAT??? ))) THEORY??? ))))
Sir Terry Pratchett...
Sir Terry Pratchett...
Was he honoured? I didn't see...
QUOTE: Geo-forces are natural forces, not criminal forces.
Sumatra-Andaman event killed 225,000± people and is greatest proof that natural forces are greatest criminal forces!!! I'm very sorry sir!
That is very non-productive in a DISCUSSION FORUM such as this one. Did you post this topic to discuss your theory or just preach to us about it?I don't have any interest what you think about the ATLANTIS!
ATLANTIS is not myth or theory. ATLANTIS IS TRUTH!
I HAVE A LOT OF PROOF ON THE FLOOR OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN!
INSIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF PROOFS ARE ALREADY DISCOVERED THERE!
SO, ATLANTIS IS TRUTH! I CAN'T UNDERSTAND!!! ))) WHAT??? ))) THEORY??? ))))
“15,000B.C. highly cultured race in Ontario Canada!”
Now my friends we have to turn at the much more interesting topic!
First my question is that. What is that?
“15,000B.C. highly cultured race in Ontario Canada!”
–in the logical framework, of course! Looks like a hunting colony of Atlantians for processing skins of wild animals for clothes. Atlantians had rapid reproduction.
If someone knows anything please help me.
Please send links or information.
Thank you!
Doctor Beaver I don't know still, what is this, who discovered? what is discovered there!
food and clothes were necessary of course. on the isolated island hunting was possible at zoo only.
1. the giant short-faced bear: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ArctodusSimusReconstruct.jpg
I think it had excellent skin!
2. Mammoth had best thickest skin! etc.
Why do you wish to avoid any discourse with me as I am presenting a serious discussion? Do you ignore people as you please and Address only Doctor Beaver, who is somewhat more gullible?
Jim!
Quote: Canada 15,000 years ago, the ice was several kilometers thick and NOTHING lived on it. It was exactly as the interior of Antartica is today.
That happened 23,000–18,000 years B.P. several kilometers thick sheet could create huge evaporation of water from warm and hot seas and oceans. that could produce huge fissure outflow from asthenosphere through the mid-ocean ridges mainly!
Conclusive evidence about global geo-catastrophe 23,000 BP!
JIM!
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2003/2002PA000769.shtml
GLAMAP 2000 presents new reconstructions of the Atlantic's sea surface temperatures (SST) at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), defined at both 21,500–18,000 years B.P. (“Last Isotope Maximum”) and 23,000–19,000 years B.P. (maximum glacial sea level low stand and orbital minimum of solar insolation;
New results mean that within Ontario was possible HUNTING 15,000 BP.!
Gullible, am I?
Gullible, am I?
This needs no comment. The facts speak for themselves. [;D] [:I] [;D]
Gullible, am I?
This needs no comment. The facts speak for themselves. [;D] [:I] [;D]
You dare to denegrate this polymath? Get back to your bullocks!
Carl Martin Now you have Exclusive right to publish my Atlantis map in your site!
What a load of ......
Is this supposed to be a Science forum?
Tolkein does this sort of thing so much better.
I agree. Getting people who know nothing about geology, let alone people who disregard the scientific process - observe, experiment, verify THEN hypothesize - belong in a forum for people who would rather decline the scientific community. They are certainly NOT going to convert any scientifically-minded people.
Sometimes scientists can learn something from an "outsider." For more on this subject of "outsiderness," check out my award-winning essay, "Outsiderness in the Scientific Community," at http://www.ancientsuns.com/fwd/rcm/other_writing.html. I once heard a story from an artist who once worked for NASA about one such incident. Scientists had been working on a solution for a universal docking mechanism. One of the scientists told his son about his work, and his young son asked, "Can't they use a funnel?" Bingo! Also, scientists can be surprisingly ignorant at times. The mini-series on Oppenheimer shows one such incident where scientists are debating ardently about the friction inside their device. After some time, they realize with much chagrin that their arguments were wasted. Wear and tear from friction is meaningless inside a nuclear bomb.I think there may be some confusion in this paragraph between the words Scientist and Engineer. The man's son came up with an engineering solution, not a scientific truth.
Here's another interesting point. During the era in which Atlantis was supposed to have existed it is estimated that you could feed 1.4 people per hectare of farmland. Multiplying that by the alleged 64 million inhabitants of Atlantis means you would need an area of farmland 8 times the size of France (roughly half the size of the U.S.A.). Judging by the map Mr Margiani has posted, Atlantis was nowhere near that size.Yes… this is impossible to study in the Oxford and Cambridge. Only my University has enough level to explain that!
Yes… this is impossible to study in the Oxford and Cambridge
I am not always such a grumpy old sod.
I think there may be some confusion in this paragraph between the words Scientist and Engineer. The man's son came up with an engineering solution, not a scientific truth.
One theory put forward is that all of Plato's figures should be divided by 10 - thus making Thera a good candidate. As Plato was writing about events that occured many centuries previous (and which had been recounted only orally) the possibility of exaggeration in the continual re-telling of the myth cannot be discounted.
You see, I like to work with facts or, at least, theories with a high degree of scientific validity. I have seen neither in any of Mr Margiani's post so far.
1. I only said my university is good as well!
Yes… this is impossible to study in the Oxford and Cambridge. Only my University has enough level to explain that!
I suspect that many of us will not think it's plausible.
Im going to write plausible book about the sunken kingdom!
Wow! four pages and this thread is still going - lol.
Is it possible to zoom in further, so we can see the cities?Through the Google; Latitude: 37:19 N, Longitude: 24:58 W.
I'm looking for that all my life!
If serious, there is treasure of the mankind!
Carl - you raise some interesting points. Unfortunately I know nothing about geology.
I shall digest the rest of what you wrote and regurgitate my musings on it later [:D]
Hello Vern!
I discovered the Atlantis City! Sorry Vern only the graveyard! 3/4 of the Golden City is covered by thickest magma layers.
Through the Google; Latitude: 37:19 N, Longitude: 24:58 W.
If serious, there is covered treasure of the mankind!
I'm looking for that all my life!
5 stade = 92 km
I suppose not, afterall he did decode it himself! But I have patrick duffy in chains, so nobody can ever prove it!I have research which proves this is truth! result of investigation for 20 years! truth is victorious!
How are you DoctorBeaver.
There are few sources in the Internet about the 92km.
the Google vividly shows mysterious survived outer arc about 100km and inner arc about 10km.
It means some investigator decided 1stade (Atlantian,Egyptian)= 100 stadia
You are right! There is not terrain of Atlantis. There are fissures only.
But the criss-crossing lines, located 600 miles west of the Canary Islands, were explained as an "artifact" of its map making process.
You are right! There is not terrain of Atlantis. There are fissures only.
But the criss-crossing lines, located 600 miles west of the Canary Islands, were explained as an "artifact" of its map making process.
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Vern - read Paul's post further up the page. Those lines are the result of how the map was constructed and are not really there.Yes; I was a little slow to catch on [:)] I saw it on the Fox channel last night and recognized the pattern from the above post. But I think the lines are in a different location than our subject kingdom.
Vern - read Paul's post further up the page. Those lines are the result of how the map was constructed and are not really there.Forgot someones fallacies about fissure lines. That has not any connection to the real terrain of the sunken pre-flood kingdom.
Atlantis has been discovered soooo many times, and as Paul said this was just another Red Herring created by the mapping methods used which Google Earth utilised.