41
New Theories / Re: Gravitoelectroweak Hypothesis?
« on: 29/03/2023 17:44:10 »You're using free electrons here as opposed to electrons in their bound state around atomic nuclei, aren't you?
How does that make any significant difference?
There would have to be some special rule/principle governing the behaviour of electrons in orbit around a nucleus allowing them to tunnel to far great distances
Sounds like something you made up in order to avoid having your model falsified by the available data.
or it might be that aspects of quantum theory are incorrect.
What's your evidence for that?
The explanatory power of this model is too great for me to simply put aside, unfortunately.
I don't see how. Your model doesn't seem to make quantifiable predictions. Can you do the math showing what the strength of gravity should be in your model? Can you do the same thing in terms of prediction the value of gravitational lensing of light?
Do you have a reference for the exchange of W bosons creating an attractive force?
I think, also, string theory more or less also made the admission that gravitational fields are formed of quanta (particles) of the electrical field (i.e. electrons).
Do you have a citation for this?
The following users thanked this post: Zer0