0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The manufacturers of frequency meters must of course be aware of this kind of problem.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 12/02/2019 22:55:05The manufacturers of frequency meters must of course be aware of this kind of problem.And they never mention it. Does that suggest something to you?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/02/2019 07:35:26Quote from: mad aetherist on 12/02/2019 22:55:05The manufacturers of frequency meters must of course be aware of this kind of problem.And they never mention it. Does that suggest something to you?(1) If it aint a problem then my idea of there being a macro ticking dilation effect must be wrong. (2) Or they have a problem but have worked out a way of minimizing it, but dont mention it. (3) Or they have a problem & haven't found any kind of solution, & dont mention it. (4) Or they dont know that they have a problem, but have an accidental built-in automatic fix.If the plane of the tuning fork aint horizontal or vertical then they know.If the tuning fork is in a vertical plane but if the centerline of the tuning fork aint horizontal or vertical then they know.
I did the experiment. Reality doesn't agree with Mad aetherist.Now, given that there's exactly the same "reasoning" behind his prediction of a change in clock rate with angle and all his other ramblings, we can discount them too.
I rotated it about two perpendicular axes.There was no change in the reading.You have been shown to be wrong.Accept it.Exp 2- well, I did the experiment near the Earth...How big a spinning wheel do you want?
I rotated it about two perpendicular axes.There was no change in the reading.
I dont think i ever mentioned it but it would be interesting to repeat that with FC fixed & the oscillator at different angles.
Anyhow i will have a think re all of this.
Anyhow Einsteinian teams measuring g at various places & times havent a clue why their results are so inconsistent. They don’t know about the aether wind & the centrifuged aether.
Anyhow Einsteinian teams measuring g at various places & times havent a clue why their results are so inconsistent.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 22/02/2019 21:39:40I dont think i ever mentioned it but it would be interesting to repeat that with FC fixed & the oscillator at different angles.I did that too- it's easy enough when you have the right kit- it's a matter of picking up one "box" and turning it or picking up the other.Obviously, you are still wrong. Stop trying to move the goalposts.Now, just for a laugh, how big an effect would you expect from what sort of wheel?Quote from: mad aetherist on 22/02/2019 21:39:40Anyhow i will have a think re all of this.Not really. When I bought the clocks I used I had lots of options. Those include this (expensive) onehttps://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/LFOCXO063815Bulk-Crystal-Oscillator-10-MHz-A-1ppb-Sinewave-15pF-5-Pin-36x27mm/123286856263?hash=item1cb4782247:g:52AAAOSw2IVbYuDU:rk:2:pf:1&frcectupt=trueAnd that is an off-the-peg oscillator that gives 10 MHz within 1ppb- that's better than a thousand fold less than you are pretending is possible. OK it's over ÂŁ500, but that's not the point. Your view would say it can't exist, but it does.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 27/11/2018 23:41:06Anyhow Einsteinian teams measuring g at various places & times havent a clue why their results are so inconsistent.You would need to cite evidence of inconsistencies before we needed to take this seriously.
Yes lots of teams in lots of countries using various instruments have had trouble getting consistent results for measuring g
Quote from: mad aetherist on 25/02/2019 22:04:11Yes lots of teams in lots of countries using various instruments have had trouble getting consistent results for measuring gGiven that g depends on local geography, why would you expect them to get consistent measures of it?It's like saying "Scientists have measured the temperature outside their window this morning and they got different results so there must be a problem with thermometers".Why don't you learn some science before trying to criticise those who have?
However little g too seems to vary with time at any one location, in a different way to the expected daily etc variation, but i am rusty on the details, i would have to re-read that stuff. I might later today.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 26/02/2019 20:34:51However little g too seems to vary with time at any one location, in a different way to the expected daily etc variation, but i am rusty on the details, i would have to re-read that stuff. I might later today.Did it occur to you that you should have read up on it before posting nonsense?And, re all that stuff about crystals.The frequencies do not change with orientation in the way you said they would.You can't argue against reality.You predicted an effect.That effect didn't exist.Incidentally the capacitance is fixed, and the effect is small- almost all the "work" is done by the crystal.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 26/02/2019 20:34:51However little g too seems to vary with time at any one location, in a different way to the expected daily etc variation, but i am rusty on the details, i would have to re-read that stuff. I might later today.Did it occur to you that you should have read up on it before posting nonsense?
And, re all that stuff about crystals. The frequencies do not change with orientation. You can't argue against reality. You predicted an effect. That effect didn't exist.
Incidentally the capacitance is fixed, and the effect is small- almost all the " work" is done by the crystal.
Why is such circuitry needed?
Its not just that capacitor (which has a special use)