0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Advice to anyone considering joining this thread:jccc insists that you can derive quantum mechanics from classical mechanics, and will not accept the obvious fact that you can't. It is a waste of time arguing with him.
Quote from: jccc on 23/06/2015 12:53:38let's see, if you have 1 electron and 1 proton, how to make an atom.if they are stick together in the beginning, no one can separate them. atom will become 2 tiny dots.if they are apart in the beginning, they will attract each other and accelerating.so every electron is precisely lucky to fall into orbit? no 1 is missing a bit? 100% success rate?You're right. It couldn't just be luck that generates this 100% success rate. Obviously there is a reason that this happens. Perhaps there is a fundamental reason that atoms do not collapse into "2 tiny dots" ... (hint, there is no need to invoke other particles, it comes from the inherent nature of electrons)
let's see, if you have 1 electron and 1 proton, how to make an atom.if they are stick together in the beginning, no one can separate them. atom will become 2 tiny dots.if they are apart in the beginning, they will attract each other and accelerating.so every electron is precisely lucky to fall into orbit? no 1 is missing a bit? 100% success rate?
nope. as discussed many times before, your "enerton" does not solve any of the problems you identify, and brings it's own set of problems... EDIT: and, I might add, there is no observation that supports the existence of your "enerton"
as i said earlier in my theory, 3 building blocks make up atoms.proton carries 900 positive charges, electron carries 1 negative charge, enertron carries tiny negative charge, but it has more charge to volume ratio than electron....1 atomic mass equals to 1800 total charges, no matter the sign of the charge, that's why proton weight 1800 times electron weight but only carries 1 positive charge, the rest 899 positive charge is used up to balance 899 enertron.
such as (as I've pointed out before):-If there are negatively charged enertons, why haven't we ever observed one by itself, or a proton that is neutralized by being surrounded by enertons, and has no electron?-If there are negatively charged enertons, why is it that we measure the charge of a proton to be exactly 1, and the charge of an electron as exactly –1? Where is there room for extra negatively charged particles in a neutral H atom?-If protons have many times the positive charge that we measure, and are surrounded by enertons to the extent that they only have an effective charge of 1, why is there only one charge available for a proton to have? We have never observed protons with charge any greater or less than 1, even when subjected to the incredible energies required to smash them into smaller subatomic particles--surely this would dislodge some enertons?-How do enertons fit in with other particles we have observed, like quarks?-Why can we remove electrons from an atom to form a positively charged ion, and interact those ions with negatively charged ions (atoms with more electrons than protons), and only electrons are transfered--never any other type of negative particle?
are uk people ever sleep? i know they laugh for no reasons on the train.