The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?

  • 16 Replies
  • 16667 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 20853
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 69 times
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« on: 10/05/2008 21:05:29 »
Dear Tankers !!

See my car ?

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Nice eh ?....Just need to pass my Sheepy driving test and get myself a booster chair and then I can ewese it.......though...I'll probably just get some mates around and climb on it's roof or something !!

But, should I wish to take it for drive.....would it run more economically with a full tank or a half tank of petrol ?...my reasoning is that a half tank will get me more miles to the gallon because there is less fuel to carry ....am I right ?...if not...why not ?


Tank ewe

Neil
Tank Enquirer
xxxxxxxx


* 2007-locus-supercar-rear-section-1280x960.jpg (44.6 kB, 313x166 - viewed 3823 times.)
« Last Edit: 10/05/2008 21:10:30 by neilep »
Logged
Men are the same as women, just inside out !
 



lyner

  • Guest
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #1 on: 10/05/2008 21:19:20 »
You could have saved this question for tanksgiving day.
And, yes, you are correct!
Logged
 

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 20853
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 69 times
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #2 on: 10/05/2008 21:31:23 »
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 10/05/2008 21:19:20
You could have saved this question for tanksgiving day.
And, yes, you are correct!

LOL !!

TANK EWE !!! sophiecentaur

..it's been a while since I answered my own question !...I was hoping my reasoning was too simple to actually guess right ! [::)]
Logged
Men are the same as women, just inside out !
 

lyner

  • Guest
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #3 on: 10/05/2008 22:08:20 »
Well, it makes sense. Lugging around a few kg of anything - be it fuel or Auntie Millie - will not help your fuel consumption.
Logged
 

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 20853
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 69 times
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #4 on: 10/05/2008 22:34:38 »
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 10/05/2008 22:08:20
Well, it makes sense. Lugging around a few kg of anything - be it fuel or Auntie Millie - will not help your fuel consumption.

Yes indeed...but I was also thinking that there may be a difference (weight dependent)in the way that the gas/petrol is supplied to the engine.....does the weight of the fuel add to the delivery rate too ?


hmmm..not too sure if I have explained myself very well here !!
Logged
Men are the same as women, just inside out !
 



lyner

  • Guest
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #5 on: 10/05/2008 22:59:30 »
In the old days, they used 'gravity feed' and a fuel tank situated above the engine. The 'head' of fluid could have had an effect on the mixture/fuel flow in a very crude form of early carburettor. Nowadays they use a pump which supplies the fuel at the correct pressure and it doesn't matter how much fuel you have in the tank. This applies to conventional and fuel injection engines.
Did I  understand you correctly?
Logged
 

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 20853
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 69 times
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #6 on: 10/05/2008 23:24:32 »
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 10/05/2008 22:59:30
In the old days, they used 'gravity feed' and a fuel tank situated above the engine. The 'head' of fluid could have had an effect on the mixture/fuel flow in a very crude form of early carburettor. Nowadays they use a pump which supplies the fuel at the correct pressure and it doesn't matter how much fuel you have in the tank. This applies to conventional and fuel injection engines.
Did I  understand you correctly?

Yes, yes you did...and you answered me perfectly !! [:)]

THANK YOU very much !!...I am an educated Sheepy !!
Logged
Men are the same as women, just inside out !
 

Offline Karen W.

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31799
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 28 times
  • "come fly with me"
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #7 on: 11/05/2008 08:03:03 »
That was a good question and the answer made perfect since..Yayyyyy! So if I empty out everything in my car including the kitchen sink and the extra seats, then i could get a tad better fuel economy.. Yes??? Does that mean that if me takes off some more weight that I might enjoy some extra money in my pocket at fuel time???
Logged

"Life is not measured by the number of Breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
 

lyner

  • Guest
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #8 on: 11/05/2008 12:31:52 »
And if you leave the kids behind on your next journey, you can stay sane as well.
Logged
 



Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 20853
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 69 times
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #9 on: 11/05/2008 18:55:52 »
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 11/05/2008 12:31:52
And if you leave the kids behind on your next journey, you can stay sane as well.

Thanks for this reminder.......I still need to leave my four bratskids with Doctorbeaver.....he says he loves kids !!
Logged
Men are the same as women, just inside out !
 

Offline ukmicky

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3065
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • View Profile
    • http://www.space-talk.com/
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #10 on: 25/05/2008 15:23:09 »
I think that judging by how quickly the cost of fuel is going up a full tank could be economial [;D]
Logged
 

Offline Poetic-Justice

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 26
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Binary Revolution
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #11 on: 25/05/2008 16:05:11 »
Quote from: ukmicky on 25/05/2008 15:23:09
I think that judging by how quickly the cost of fuel is going up a full tank could be economial [;D]
I agree! My mum never shuts up when she has to go and fill up.
Logged
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7983
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 284 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #12 on: 30/05/2008 18:55:32 »
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 10/05/2008 22:59:30
In the old days, they used 'gravity feed' and a fuel tank situated above the engine. The 'head' of fluid could have had an effect on the mixture/fuel flow in a very crude form of early carburettor. Nowadays they use a pump which supplies the fuel at the correct pressure and it doesn't matter how much fuel you have in the tank. This applies to conventional and fuel injection engines.
Did I  understand you correctly?

The way fuel supply was regulated in these sorts of set-ups was in a float chamber. The carburettor has a sump containing a buoyant float. As fuel fills the cup the float rises until it reaches a threshold level at which, rather like a ballcock, it shuts off the incoming fuel supply.

Fuel is then drawn through the carburettor from the cup during the induction stroke. Most lawn mowers today use the same principle, as do most motorbikes.

Chris
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



lyner

  • Guest
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #13 on: 31/05/2008 00:31:40 »
The float was made of brass and I had one in which a small hole developed. The mixture got richer and richer as the float began to sink.
Logged
 

Offline turnipsock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 586
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Beekeeper to the unsuspecting
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #14 on: 31/05/2008 01:09:40 »
Since a fuel tank is two pressings welded together they tend to burst around the weld.

My tank leaks if put in more than 30l. In my case it is more economical to run the tank half empty...then i don't have to worry about people throwing out cigarette ends.
Logged
Beeswax: Natures petrol tank sealant.

When things are in 3D, is it always the same three dimensions?
 

Offline jin

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #15 on: 03/06/2008 08:31:47 »
nice car dude
F


|
|
|
|
|
E
Is better for this
Logged
 

Offline qazibasit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 344
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
What is more economical....a half full tank or a full tank ?
« Reply #16 on: 14/06/2008 21:15:08 »
well nice car nelip, now i know why u spend so much time on naked scientist forum coz u are a rich guy and u dont need to earn money and own a very nice car. well what i have heard from many mechanical engineers and car repair mechanics is that a car with a full fuel tank consumes less fuel as compared to half tank or almost empty tank. Thats why when there is low fuel in the car it burns more quickly than when there is fuel.
Logged
"There is never too late to make a change".
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Why are the half-filled and fully filled orbitals more stable?

Started by IndranilBoard Chemistry

Replies: 4
Views: 7268
Last post 10/09/2018 07:09:02
by Indranil
Is an hour of exercise on alternate days equivalent to half an hour daily?

Started by neilepBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 4
Views: 6476
Last post 18/06/2008 22:51:19
by neilep
How are very short half-life medical radio isotopes produced and stored?

Started by Eric A. TaylorBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 4
Views: 5791
Last post 13/02/2011 14:09:26
by Bored chemist
Do half lives of radioactive materials affected by gravity potential?

Started by hamdani yusufBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 2828
Last post 10/10/2019 20:00:20
by Bored chemist
If the uk wash colder, would it take CO2 equal to half a million cars off road?

Started by PetrochemicalsBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 9
Views: 1347
Last post 11/12/2021 02:10:02
by Petrochemicals
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.134 seconds with 79 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.