Naked Science Forum

General Science => Question of the Week => Topic started by: thedoc on 12/09/2008 11:35:36

Title: QotW - 08.09.14 - Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?
Post by: thedoc on 12/09/2008 11:35:36
I was just wondering, is there any radiation that would come from a glow-in-the-dark watch that would be harmful to the wearer?
Asked by Sandra, Melbourne

                                          Hear this Question on our Podcast (http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/show/2008.09.14/)
Title: Re: QotW - 08.09.14 - Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?
Post by: thedoc on 12/09/2008 11:35:36
Philip Clarke, University of Edinburgh, Experimental Particle Physics Group:

It depends very much on the type of dial that you’re considering.  By far the most common watch that you come across that’s glow in the dark is called a phosphorescent watch.  Essentially the watch is coated in a paint which absorbs light and then re-emits it.  These watches are completely harmless.

[img float=right]http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/uploads/RTEmagicC_399px-Rolex-Submariner.jpg.jpg[/img]The second type of watch is called a tritium watch.  The modern way to do this is you have the same phosphorescent paint but this time it’s mixed with small tubes filled with tritium.  Tritium is radioactive and emits beta particles.  These have the same effect of exciting the phosphorescent paint.  This time tritium has got a half-life of 12 years.  The beta particles that are emitted are not very energetic so if anything they couldn’t even penetrate the outermost skin layer.

The third watch I’d like to mention is a radium watch.  They have very much the same design but this time instead of tritium they’re mixed with radium.  The half-life is sixteen hundred years.  However, they may not seem to be as radioactive because the phosphor in the paint gets eaten up by the radium.  I’ve got a small demonstration here so I’ve got an old watch that I’m going to hold a Geiger counter to.  If I turn the Geiger counter on you’ll hear it clicking:

<click>

That’s when I hold it slightly close to the watch.  If I hold it really close to the watch:

<much more rapid series of clicks>

And the take it away from the watch then the background count – you can hear the occasional count just now is much lower than if you hold it closer to the watch.  These watches are extremely radioactive.  However they’re still not too harmful unless you were to break the watch and inhale it or somehow ingest the watch.
Title: Re: QotW - 08.09.14 - Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?
Post by: rhade on 12/09/2008 16:55:18
I assume the question relates to those watches that have hands which absorb and re-emit light, rather than the electro luminescent kind. Early examples of these used radioactive materials, I believe it was radium, which was harmful. However, there is no harm from the materials used in watches today.
Title: Re: QotW - 08.09.14 - Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?
Post by: techmind on 15/09/2008 19:32:24
I was just wondering, is there any radiation that would come from a glow-in-the-dark watch that would be harmful to the wearer?
Asked by Sandra, Melbourne

Hear this Question on our Podcast (http://www.thenakedscientists.com)

I haven't heard the podcast yet, but if it's an old watch more than 40 years old then it might contain a radioactive isotope. A radioactive glow-in-the-dark would continue glowing even if left in the dark for many hours.

Modern non-radioactive glow-in-the-dark materials are "charged up" by visible and ultraviolet light, but their glow becomes weaker over many minutes so that once they've been in the dark for half an hour barely glow at all.
Title: QotW - 08.09.14 - Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?
Post by: Arbitrageur on 20/06/2011 20:35:52
That's good information from thedoc.

I know that anecdotes may have limited value in assessing risk, but this experience sticks out in my mind. An older man was showing me his older watch, and we got to talking about how it glowed in the dark, and then he removed the watch and showed be a lump on his wrist directly under the watch. He seemed to think the radiation from the watch might have caused the lump which I'm guessing was sort of a benign cyst which he had for some time, I don't think he even told his doctor about it. Nor did he seem to feel the watch threatened him (at least, not his life), because in spite of his suspicion about the lump, he continued to wear the watch.

I'm pretty sure the watch was the radium type thedoc mentioned. Ever since I saw that guys lump in his wrist, I've never wanted to wear a watch with radium in it [;)] I don't know how rational that is based on one anecdote, but knowing what I do about radiation, it certainly seems plausible to me that the lump might have resulted from radiation from the watch.
Title: QotW - 08.09.14 - Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?
Post by: syhprum on 21/06/2011 06:29:44
As a boy 75 years ago I scraped some of the Radium paint from an watch dial and I have often wondered if I ingested any, if I did it has not as yet had any life shortening effect.
Title: QotW - 08.09.14 - Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?
Post by: imatfaal on 21/06/2011 10:30:59
I wear a watch with tritium tubes - and after 40 years it is still bright enough to read in the pitch dark (although maybe the previous owner had them replaced). 

The watch picture above has luminescent paint - either Luminova or Super-Luminova;  in the early 60s Rolex changed from Radium to Tritium, but dials with Tritium are marked with a T either side of the SWISS / SWISS MADE underneath the 6.