0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
We have all seen computer graphics showing gravity as a three-dimensional grid with a star and a planet deforming the grid.
This is a nice visualization of gravity, but let’s consider the real-universe implications. It means that in certain regions - according to Einstein’s theories - space itself is distorted, being compressed or expanded due to the effects of gravity.
First space has no properties. It is just a measurement.
The distortions of what Einstein calls space are really the compression and or expansion of the gravitational wave which exists in dark matter/ dark energy.
There are three forms of energy, linear, angular, and spherical. All matter constantly radiates dark matter/energy. this is emitted in jumps.When a sphere of dark energy is radiated it kicks against the previous quanta of dark energy. The kickback causes gravity. thus the universe is full of what I call dot-waves. You cannot see them because they are spherical energy and you only see linear and angular forms of energy such as a photon.
That's quite wrong. Space does have properties such as being curved. Saying that it is "just" a measurement does nothing but prove that point since what is t ere is what is measured.
All of those ideas are dead wrong. May I ask you where you got these ideas from?
The Michelson–Morley experiment attempted to prove there's an aether quality of empty space. If there is such a quality, it's currently beyond our ability to detect it, so it's more or less agreed, negative on the aether.General relativity predicts gravity has a cone shape distortion on space and time, but the distortion is in dilation of time and strength in the field of gravity.
It could be argued that space is simply an abstract concept that is useful to illustrate certain theoretical ways of modelling the universe. This is not something I personally believe.
The effects of gravity are very perplexing. LIGO experiment, in a way kinda sorta, proves that gravity waves are propagated at the speed of light. There's two instruments that have agreed one instance as observed. That's not a lot of evidence, but it's the most there is and its what we have to work with, at present.The Michelson–Morley experiment attempted to prove there's an aether quality of empty space. If there is such a quality, it's currently beyond our ability to detect it, so it's more or less agreed, negative on the aether.
General relativity predicts gravity has a cone shape distortion on space and time, but the distortion is in dilation of time and strength in the field of gravity.Because time and gravity are coupled tightly together, it tends to make one (me) wonder if they're not the two different aspects of the same force. Einstein's General Reactivity does a good job tying it together, so we may better understand, it still doesn't seem to be the complete picture.When you consider that both time and gravity are the only aspects of reality that function unary in fashions... Maybe anti-gravity is the only way to go back in time.
Just an update for this old post: I created a YouTube video and Facebook page with my latest ideas. Just search for "Cosmic Compression". Cosmic Compression and Cosmic Expansion - the warping of space and time throughout the universe - may play a much more significant role than we have realized, changing our understanding of Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Big Bang.