0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So do you think a cannon ball would have enough mass to show a significant effect?
Quote from: jeffreyH on 15/01/2014 17:55:24So do you think a cannon ball would have enough mass to show a significant effect? No, but you do, or at least that is what your statement clearly implied. If, as you originally stated, the heat generated is inversely proportional to the distance to the inside of the shell, then it must be infinitely hot at the centre of a solid. Or, if as you subsequently stated, the heat is directly proportional to the distance, it must be infinitely hot at the centre of an infinitely tenuous universe.Now this isn't a matter of subtle measurement: we (or at least you) are predicting infinite quantities of heat.Your latter suggestion, however bizarre, does at least explain the creation of the universe. The amount of heat at the centre of an infinite vacuum must be infinite, according to your theory, so the universe will indeed have begun as a big bang in the middle of nothing. Full marks, and collect your Nobel Prize at the door!
While I agree with you if there is a direct link between the photon and the graviton, I don't believe it's a gluon type of nature. The photon has a spin of one, in the graviton has a spin of 2. They are capable of traveling together with no interference, they would even have the same frequency. They are released, reflected or absorbed. at the same time.