The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of gem
  3. Show Posts
  4. Posts Thanked By User
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - gem

Pages: [1]
1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is time travel possible?
« on: 12/04/2021 01:45:17 »
Quote from: gem on 12/04/2021 00:37:46
Hi all
Halc can I please just clarify your points in regards to;
Quote from: Halc
All clocks are affected by these things. Atomic clocks are in no way special in this way. Paint peels slower relative to a frame in which it moves faster.
In regards to your first point does direction of relative away/towards have any bearing
"Direction of relative" does not parse. If you mean direction of motion, the answer is no, it matters not. In SR, time dilation relative to inertial frame F is a function of your speed relative to F, and speed, being a scalar, doesn't have a direction.

Quote
Quote from: Halc
The coordinate rate of clocks can indeed be negative given a non-inertial coordinate system.
are you stating rate of atomic clocks as negative as going in reverse or just slowing down ?.
Because if negative = reverse
I meant reverse. We're talking about a coordinate effect, and one can create a non-inertial coordinate system where some clocks run backwards. Look up the Andromeda 'paradox' as an illustration of this.

Quote
are we not setting the scenario of the paint analogy going from peeling/flaking into the wind to.  returning to the painted surface becoming shiny and new then liquid in the brush/sprayer to been back in the paint tin ?
If my coordinate system orders the paint events that way, then yes. It's just a coordinate system.
The following users thanked this post: gem

2
New Theories / Re: Split: Attempts to falsify relativity
« on: 17/03/2021 03:12:26 »
Quote from: gem on 17/03/2021 00:35:24
So is it not just an energy wave detector, detecting an effect from a cause ?

It is an energy wave detector. The gravitational waves are a cause by which changes in the mirror distance can be detected. That is a cause producing a detectable effect. We can know when they are caused by gravitational waves and not local disturbances because (1) gravitational waves produce predictable, regular and opposite changes between the two different arms of the detectors, and (2) LIGO has two stations very, very far apart: one in Louisiana and one in Washington state. If both detectors pick up the trademark pattern of a gravitational wave at roughly the same time, then that rules out local vibrations as the cause. VIRGO, a similar gravitational wave detector in Italy, can provide further confirmation of the detection.
The following users thanked this post: gem

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.