0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
When you say "Accept it!", are you telling me to accept time dilation or are you saying that you now accept time dilation?
From what I have seen from the N-Field thread you are not really improving at all - you have just increase the amount of jargon.
I was being sarcastic, saying , not only do I accept it, I have improved it and can totally explain the reality of it.
My two opening statements that are true, show no actual time dilation.
Quote from: Thebox on 20/02/2018 01:05:37I was being sarcastic, saying , not only do I accept it, I have improved it and can totally explain the reality of it. Interesting, given how absolutely certain you said you were that you had completely disproved the possibility of time dilation. The quote in my signature comes to mind. So you were the master of time and space, were you? Einstein would have conceded to you about the nonexistence of time dilation, eh? We were all wrong when we told you that your time dilation denial was nonsense, yes?Quote from: Thebox on 17/01/2017 11:18:31My two opening statements that are true, show no actual time dilation.So you proved that time dilation could not exist using "logical axiom proofs" in the past, huh? How does that look in retrospect now? A little short on logic and axioms, it seems.You'd best use this as a lesson for future reference next time you think you can't be wrong about something.
A very simple experiment I have for you, add some energy to the Caesium atom and see if time speeds up.
Quote from: Thebox on 19/02/2018 23:01:05A very simple experiment I have for you, add some energy to the Caesium atom and see if time speeds up. I can think of another experiment, one that wouldn't require the high-precision equipment needed to observe a single atom. Take a water-soluble radioactive tracer and dissolve it in a certain quantity of water. Then separate that radioactive water into two batches of equal mass. Put one batch in the refrigerator and heat the other batch on the stove until it is close to boiling. Now take both batches and use a Geiger counter to measure their respective radioactivity.If increases in temperature cause time to move more quickly, then the radioisotope dissolved in the hot water should decay more quickly than the radioisotope dissolved in the cold water. This would result in the Geiger counter picking up more "hits" from the hot water than from the cold water. If time dilation doesn't work this way, then the Geiger counter should show no difference between the two samples.
Have you done this experiment? If so what was the outcome?
It is normally stated that the rate of radioactive decay is unaffected by temperature but it has recently suggested that the stream of Neutrinos that flow from the Sun has some affect.The intensity of this stream varies according to our distance from the Sun that changes by a small amount thru the year and this is thought to affect the rate of decay
Please state your source.
Quote from: The Spoon on 20/02/2018 11:00:28Please state your source. There were some studies purporting to show that half-life changes (slightly) with the seasons: http://wavewatching.net/2012/09/01/from-the-annals-of-the-impossible-experimental-physics-edition/A later study suggests that such seasonal variations may not actually happen: https://phys.org/news/2014-10-textbook-knowledge-reconfirmed-radioactive-substances.html
There are lots of things you can use for measuring the flow of time.One possibility is to look at the linewidth of a gas discharge lamp- say a sodium lamp.There are effects of temerperature- very carfully measured ones- and they show the effects of Dopler shifts, but not of time dilation.The experiment has been done. Temperature didn't affect time.So, we can write that idea of as "not how the world works".
Well, it's an unorthodox approach.Can you show where it leads?(and I want maths + thermodynamics rather than hogwash here)
There are processes where ΔS is zero, but time doesn't stop.
(and I want maths + thermodynamics rather than hogwash here)
Did you see this bitQuote from: Bored chemist on 20/02/2018 21:39:49(and I want maths + thermodynamics rather than hogwash here)
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/02/2018 22:04:52Did you see this bitQuote from: Bored chemist on 20/02/2018 21:39:49(and I want maths + thermodynamics rather than hogwash here)Well as you know I am useless at maths, you must be quite good at it , why don't you do the maths and present it to the forum?