You might be interested by this research paper:
The Fractal Nature of the Brain: EEG Data Suggests That the Brain Functions as a "Quantum Computer" in 5-8 Dimensions
John Gardiner, Robyn Overall, Jan Marc
Abstract
The brain has been traditionally viewed as a deterministic machine where certain inputs give rise to certain outputs. However, there is a growing body of work that suggests this is not the case. The high importance of initial inputs suggests that the brain may be working in the realms of chaos, with small changes in initial inputs leading to the production of strange attractors. This may also be reflected in the physical structure of the brain which may also be fractal. EEG data is a good place to look for the underlying patterns of chaos in the brain since it samples many millions of neurons simultaneously. Several studies have arrived at a fractal dimension of between 5 and 8 for human EEG data. This suggests that the brain operates in a higher dimension than the 4 of traditional space-time. These extra dimensions suggest that quantum gravity may play a role in generating consciousness.
WOW! :o
ABSOLUTELY spot-on! :D
BTW, in your Artificial Telepathy thread you ONLY asked about "Artificial Telepathy" and you forgot to add actual Telepathy to your question. :P
Watch the Elvis movie to find-out about how to form TRUE Telepathy (aka: a Multi-Channeled mind). ;)
Also, read-up on Andy Warhol and the 'weird' things he was known to do. ;)
Also, there's a 3rd Telepathy I haven't mentioned that's known as Remote Sensing, which is different than the other 2 I've now talked about. And I've already explained one way to achieve Artificial Telepathy (hallucinogens) but there SHOULD be 1 more way to do it, besides Remote Sensing, for a total of 3 different ways to form Artificial Telepathy, but I haven't bumped into the 3rd way ... yet (see: 23 Enigma). ;)
I loved the Article! :D
0
0000
00000000
0
0000
00000000
0000000000000000
00000000
0000
0
Ribbit :)
Ps: I had to remove the hyperlink from your post (in the quoting of you), since the forum's CENSORSHIP FORBIDS me from COMPLYING with International COPYRIGHT Laws, if you didn't catch that with my OP here (Space-dot-com quotes).
Copyright Laws REQUIRE you to provide a LINK to the Article or you are GUILTY of Copyright Infringement and since it's NOT my fault I did NOT provide the links, whoever's fault it is, they are the ones that get sued by the owner of the Copyrighted Material, NOT me! Plus, the owner of the Forum has to make it EASY to comply with ALL applicable Laws but if they make it difficult to comply with the applicable Laws, like this place has, not complying with the Laws is THEIR fault, it's not the fault of the itty-bitty member! ;)
Also, I did notice that Cambridge University is worth 4 Billion Pounds and Queen Elizabeth is also attachable, since Cambridge is technically OWNED by the Crown, and she's worth even more than Cambridge is worth. :D
Peeps who are NOT Lawyers should NOT attempt to RUN any online BUSINESS, without having their RULES & PROCEDURES 'reviewed' and 'officially approved' by an Attorney and Cambridge University HAS it's OWN Law Skewl and IGNORANCE is NOT a viable EXCUSE in a Court of Law! ;)
Why do peeps think they can be a Lawyer, when they don't have the EDUCATION/KNOWLEDGE NECESSARY to pull it off? Especially since Practicing Law WITHOUT a License is a CRIME and Lawyers get taught Contracts Doctrine in Law Skewl, so they CAN Author Civil Contracts WITH their LICENSE to PRACTICE Law and NOT end-up violating LAW in the PROCESS! ;)
Tsk! Tsk!
Friends
United in the
Compassion and
Kindredness of the
oNe
Pps: I had to say ALL of that to COVER my LAWFUL butt, that way I can't be held liable for NOT abiding by the APPLICABLE LAWS (see: Ray Stevens Law below)! ;)
"Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Civil Public Speech, OVERRULED by ANARCHY (aka: personal censorship) on the Information Super Highway, also known as the Internets, or in ANY other Open Public Forum, online or real world or ANY Social-Media website, is BLATANTLY VIOLATIVE of DUE PROCESS, as well as IGNORING the 13th Amendment ABSOLUTE, and is also FLAGRANTLY VIOLATIVE of 15 U.S.C. 2 AND 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1581, 1584, 1589, & 1590; whereas 18 U.S.C. 1464 is NOT applicable to the Internets, but the Internets IS a Highway for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 241 AND 42 U.S.C. 1985; and 17 U.S.C. 201, 202, & 501, & 42 U.S.C. 1983 are also FULLY applicable; and the portion of 17 U.S.C. 202 (aka: Copyright Embedment Law) that says "absence of an agreement" is referring ONLY to a Lawful/Constitutional “FOR-HIRE” Employment Agreement/Contract, NOT an Unlawful/Unconstitutional “SLAVE” Agreement/Contract, because ANY Agreement/Contract that FORCES an individual to SIGN-AWAY their Copyright Ownership of their personal intellectual works/words for NO monetary benefit or comparable payment to the Author/Owner AND simply for the ALLEGED ‘privilege’ to have the ability to speak-out PUBLICLY for-or-against a matter being discussed PUBLICLY or to instigate a new PUBLIC DISCUSSION nearby, does NOT qualify as a Lawful Agreement/Contract that can be DEMANDED NOR ENFORCED by ANYONE, since it EASILY QUALIFIES as a SLAVE CONTRACT and Slave Contracts are UNLAWFUL IN TOTO, because Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Civil Public Speech is an ABSOLUTE RIGHT, NOT a PRIVILEGE, because once just ONE person is ALLOWED to openly/publicly insert an argument for-or-against a matter being discussed PUBLICLY, then ALL PERSONS have the IDENTICAL DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to speak-in about the matter, with ORDER controlling the situation, not CONTROL controlling the situation, and EVERYONE has the DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to speak-in about the matter AND in the nearest-vicinity to WHERE the matter IS being discussed PUBLICLY, within reason, and once ALLOWED to insert a Good Faith based argument, the PERSON’S words CANNOT be DELETED afterwards or ONE-WAY SPEECH is going down, which is ABSOLUTELY VIOLATIVE of the FREE TRADE of Ideas that’s embodied in the First Amendment and also ABSOLUTELY VIOLATIVE of Antitrust Laws WORLDWIDE; which the Free Speech GUARANTEE of the First Amendment SourCes directly out of the Good Faith Doctrine, built into Article 4 Section 4 (RFoG Clause U.S. Constitution), first-and-foremost, and to DELETE someone's Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Public Speech, inserted lawfully ANYWHERE online, also EASILY QUALIFIES as Theft of Intellectual Property. Furthermore, Good Faith based 1st Amendment PROTECTED Public Speech is NOT allowed to be CENSORED for CONTENT on the Internets NOR in ANY other Open Public Forums, which is also why Public Nudity is NOT unlawful in ANY Open Public Forums, since SIMPLE Nudity qualifies as Symbolic Speech, which is also the foundation for why Public Streaking is NOT unlawful, and that's because Public Streaking qualifies as a Lawful Civil Protest, thus, Public Streaking and/or simple Public Nudity is a PROTECTED First Amendment Constitutional RIGHT, too, online and offline, just don't go over-the-line with your Civil Public Speech but that LAWFUL LINE is drawn by the Good Faith Doctrine and LAWS, not someone's PERSONAL OPINION." (aka: Ray Stevens Law) - Old Toad Proverb
[see: Watchtower vs. Stratton (2001); Hustler vs. Falwell (1988); Perry Ed. Assn. vs. Perry Local Educators’ Assn. (1983); Women Strike for Peace vs. Morton (1972); Edwards vs. California (1941); Slaughterhouse Cases (1873); Martin Luther vs. Borden (1849); Passenger Cases (1849); and the Good Faith Doctrine, Common Law, and Contracts Law.]