The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of alancalverd
  3. Show Posts
  4. Thanked Posts
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - alancalverd

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 50
1
Just Chat! / Re: Erectile Dysfunction And Its Solution
« on: 25/06/2022 11:35:24 »
OK, Paul, here's a detumescive response to your rampant wit.

AFAIK (not IIRC) Sildenafil does not induce spontaneous or sustained erection: stimulation is also required.  Ergo no pandemic of priapism.

Pedant? Moi? Now where's that damned tongue-in-cheek  emoticon?

Switch-mode power to your elbow, my friend!
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

2
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why where the native Americans so vulnerable to disease?
« on: 24/06/2022 11:44:35 »
Eurasia was genetically very diverse and had suffered innumerable plagues and pestilences by the time Columbus left these shores, so what was left of the population (after a very high rate of perinatal and infant deaths) was fairly resistant and understood some methods of quarantine and treatment for the diseases they exported. But they didn't export the treatment.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

3
Physiology & Medicine / Re: The crucial ingredients of CBD:
« on: 23/06/2022 22:42:06 »
You can probably hang the soft bits that everybody remembers, on a secondhand skeleton, thus eliminating most of the requirement for calcium and phosphorus. The other stuff is only required to make it all function, but to misquote a famous authority, a dead mouse is a perfect model of a live mouse, if only for a short period.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

4
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why where the native Americans so vulnerable to disease?
« on: 22/06/2022 17:26:38 »
Relatively small gene pool, isolated for maybe 10,000 years, never acquired residual herd immunity (people often forget the word "residual" - you may have to kill 90% of the population to achieve it!), many deliberately infected in the later stages of colonisation, deprived of agricultural land and clean water, negligible provision of health services....you name it. 
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

5
That CAN'T be true! / Re: Are home water filtration systems a waste of money?
« on: 15/06/2022 11:03:12 »
Worth remembering that when the US food & drug administration tested practically every available brand of bottled water about 30 years back, they found New York public mains water to have the lowest level of pathogens and contaminants.

Also worth noting that the BBC ran an open-label tasting competition between various bottled waters. The highest score from every taster was given to a product whose label said it was spring water from an uninhabited  Pacific island over 1000 miles from any source of industrial pollutant. All the bottles actually contained chilled London tap water.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

6
That CAN'T be true! / Re: can deuterium depleted water improve health?
« on: 14/06/2022 18:08:13 »
It's a good way of getting rid of the waste product after you have extracted the valuable deuterium from tap water.

Much the same as corn flakes, made from the waste after extracting syrup, glue, and a dozen other valuable products from maize. Apparently the sludge is so useless and indigestible that they have to add sugar, salt, vitamins and minerals in order to sell it as a food.

As for Marmite.....but at least it tastes good.
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

7
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What are the properties of space?
« on: 14/06/2022 13:41:06 »
Quote from: Eternal Student on 13/06/2022 16:28:52
Maybe there are some important dynamic fields in the universe and the frequency of radiation emitted by Caesium-133 atoms is changing as a result of that, so that the atomic clocks used to define the second are not actually keeping the correct time.
If said fields are homogeneous, then we'll never know because everything is coming and going at the same time. Except that the light received from an object umpteen light years away will have a different frequency from what we have calculated, and whatever determines the field vectors must have some supraluminal means of directing them.

And if the fields are not homogeneous, then we can blame GPS navigation errors  on something we can't sense or predict, i.e. local wobbles in the Eternalstudent field. But so far, no evidence - I get the blame every time for not updating the database.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

8
Just Chat! / Re: how can intelligent people be trump supporters?
« on: 13/06/2022 16:22:19 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 13/06/2022 15:25:35
an inveterate liar, a narcissist, a positive danger to democracy and an utterly selfish man
Rather like our present prime minister. Or indeed almost every member of his government, some of whom are also stupid. Or Mr Putin.

Fact is that a successful politician is someone who had no friends at school, for reasons that become obvious in later life. Children can smell it.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

9
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What are the properties of space?
« on: 12/06/2022 00:45:04 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 10/06/2022 18:42:25
I would argue that G is a property as it tells us the degree of warping a given mass will produce
But doesn't that make it a property of mass rather than spacetime?
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

10
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What are the properties of space?
« on: 10/06/2022 13:00:59 »
Current consensus is that the big bang produced a lot of stuff dispersed in space, and gravitation gradually makes it coalesce into lumps, so the observed separation is temporary. Except that some stuff seems to be receding at an ever-increasing rate, presumably into more space.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

11
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What are the properties of space?
« on: 10/06/2022 00:06:38 »
Space is what separates bodies of stuff. Not sure about "properties" beyond μ and ε, but we can certainly describe the static (fields) and dynamic (particles and waves) contents of regions of space. So if you want to be philosophical you could describe the ability to contain such phenomena  as a property of space, but I suspect this is a sterile  intellectual cul-de-sac.

Is G a property of space? I think not.  g is an observable property of stuff, and you could argue that G is merely a constant of proportionality that relates the observable g to m and r, because if you interpose a third body of any length between your two experimental masses it doesn't alter the original gravitational attraction by filling space, but adds to it by virtue of its own mass.
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

12
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a net heat exchange between water and ice at 0 degree C?
« on: 08/06/2022 18:01:01 »
The average of n samples of x is (52dcd34e0f0dbd627bd0d42f37e57632.gif xi)/n. At least it was when I was alive, but this thread seems to be some kind of scientific purgatory.
The following users thanked this post: Origin

13
Just Chat! / Re: Titles
« on: 04/06/2022 22:41:47 »
I guess if I had a life, I wouldn't be posting here. So maybe the top rank should be "living dead".
The following users thanked this post: Eternal Student

14
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution / Re: Why Are There No Freshwater Cephalopods?
« on: 29/05/2022 15:17:14 »
Same reason there are no oceanic apes, I guess.Each to his own ecological niche!
The following users thanked this post: neilep

15
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Can You Define What a Woman Is ?
« on: 28/05/2022 18:01:20 »
Just stick with the XX chromosomes. The reproductive bits don't always work and are sometimes removed if they go very wrong, but every cell of a woman's body contains two X chromosomes and every adult member of homo sapiens with two X chromosomes is a woman.
The following users thanked this post: neilep

16
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Does reasoning like humans exist in one species only ?
« on: 28/05/2022 17:54:23 »
Quote from: neilep on 28/05/2022 17:40:52
I was wondering, should circumstances had prevailed, of the possibility that a dinosaur (or other species) would have evolved along the same speed and scale as humans.
They did far better. On the one hand they produced such a successful variant that the crocodile probably hasn't changed its design or its habits in 200,000,000 years, whilst  in a completely original direction they evolved feathers, hollow bones and a high temperature metabolism so they could fly.

After some 100,000 years, humans have merely invented more methods and more stupid reasons for killing other humans who present no actual threat.
The following users thanked this post: neilep

17
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Does reasoning like humans exist in one species only ?
« on: 28/05/2022 17:48:29 »
Many years ago I watched a gorilla in Chessington Zoo perform Galileo's demonstration of universal gravitation.

He had two apples, one larger than the other. He dropped them both and noted that they hit the ground at the same time. He then repeated the experiment twice: once exactly as before, then with changed hands.That is the whole process of experimental science: observe, hypothesise, repeat, alter one parameter at a time to test the hypothesis.

Humans being singularly (probably uniquely) superstitious and gullible, the Church persecuted Galileo, but the other gorillas, being of superior intellect, accepted the result and the experimenter ate the apples in peace.
The following users thanked this post: neilep

18
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Can JUST a head survive ?
« on: 27/05/2022 19:57:00 »
No obvious reason why not, but whilst an elementary textbook might show any organ merely devouring glucose  and oxygen (science), the details of the plumbing and chemistry are very complicated (engineering - or biology, if you prefer).

Old Irish story: Traveller arrives in Dublin and asks the way to Cork. Bloke says "If I was going to Cork, I wouldn't start from Dublin". So here's the sales engineer's response:

The simplest and cheapest way of keeping a head alive is to leave it attached to the original body, which can process common foods and ambient air into whatever the brain needs. Our standard product runs on fish, chips and mushy peas, washed down with beer. Runs for about 80 years with minimum maintenance, and if you get a complementary pair, they will make another one - complete with head - automatically.
The following users thanked this post: neilep

19
Question of the Week / Re: QotW - 22.05.23 - Where does the potential energy of a spring go in acid?
« on: 23/05/2022 18:32:18 »
My father was asked the same question in the 1940s - it's a real classic.

Fortunately James Joule answered it on his honeymoon when he measured the mechanical equivalent of heat, 4.2 joules per calorie. If you dissolve two identical springs, one compressed, and measure the heat of reaction, one will release a bit more energy. 
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

20
Just Chat! / Re: a suitable pseudonym
« on: 21/05/2022 22:31:23 »
Quote from: Eternal Student on 21/05/2022 18:47:08
You can safely assume that many scientists are borderline Autistic
How safe is that assumption? I've never met a scientist who I would call remotely autisitic. Progress in science depends on absorbing ideas from others, communicating your own findings, engaging in discussion and review, and lots of teamwork. Don't confuse the ability to focus and analyse, and the possession of a healthy contempt for consensus and imprecision, with autism.

Apropos the question in hand, unless your  name is John Smith, I can see no reason to adopt a pseudonym. The handle your parents gave you should be enough to identify most people in a small forum.
The following users thanked this post: Eternal Student

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 50
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.257 seconds with 69 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.