The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Timemachine1
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Timemachine1

Pages: [1]
1
General Science / How much can a gamma knife, or X-ray beam be collimated.
« on: 18/01/2017 00:38:53 »
Or focused to ionize neurons in the brain at micron cubic ranges.[/size]I have been told that gamma beams cannot work with ball lenses, but X-rays, and other electromagnetic radiation, I am unsure about.how much can gamma knife beams be collimated without using ball lenses.What would be the smallest cubic area in the brain you could ionize, without gamma beams passing through a ball lens.Can you tell me the effects for X-Rays, and other electromagnetic radiation, if they can pass through a ball lens or not.If you can ionize neurons at micron scales you can stop the spread of Parkinson's disease throughout the brain.It would be tricky, and complex, but not impossible.You could probably erase memories specifically in an animal also, with this technique.Thank you for your help with this question. ;D [/color]

2
Chemistry / Could solid, opaque objects become translucent with this technique
« on: 22/04/2016 22:51:52 »
Is it possible for any invisible EM waves, like radio waves, ultraviolet soft, or hard X- Rays, or gamma rays, to be combined with other types of EM waves to be able to move electrons in the carbon block, to a shell level that does not absorb visible light, like in glass.
So you mix invisible EM waves of different wavelengths, and frequencies together, you could mix four invisible EM waves as a single beam.
So you want the EM wave to pass through the block of carbon, while also the electrons absorb some of the invisible EM waves, so the electron moves to a shell level that does not absorb visible light.
So the mixed invisible EM waves are passing through the carbon, while some of the invisible EM waves are being absorbed, and moving the electrons to a shell level where they will not absorb visible light.
Like in glass, the electrons are in shell levels that do not absorb visible light
Thank you for your help, anything helps even a few words.

3
General Science / How close are we to building a human memory-erasing machine?
« on: 22/04/2016 22:47:12 »
How close in today's technology of building a human memory erasing machine?

Could it be done in these three steps.?

To make human tissue translucent, maybe you could make invisible EM waves pass through a solid object, while combining the EM waves with other types of EM waves to make electrons absorb the invisible EM waves, and move to higher shell levels.
So you move electrons to shell levels that do not absorb visible light.
So as you mix EM waves together, the EM waves pass through the solid object while exciting the electrons to higher shell levels.
Then use red light to pass through the solid object, while the electrons are in shell levels that do not absorb visible light.
So basically you are turning the carbon electron energy levels, to the energy levels of electrons in glass.
Thus making the solid object translucent, by a certain percentage.
Then combine this technique with the INUMAC MRI machine, that can see the BOLD signal up to 1000 microns small.
So you are getting a general idea of where brain activity is happening.
Then combine this technique with the latest MEG, machine, and EEG machine, to locate neuronal activity, in the brain.
Now to ionize the neurons modify a gamma knife machine, to be able to ionize neurons at micron scales, or smaller.
This is completely doable because a gamma beam can pass through something as small as a atom.
Just the ball lenses have to maybe be worked on to collimate the beams.
But it should be completely doable.
Do you think it could work?

4
Chemistry / Is the electron eV levels known for electrons in glass material
« on: 14/04/2016 23:31:48 »
Is the electron eV levels known for electrons in glass material, or what is the eV energy levels in glass.?
So in glass, transparent liquids, and plastics is the eV for the electron known to science.
The eV levels for electrons in gases are known like in hydrogen, and helium, but are they known for glass, and transparent liquids, and plastics.
Or is it just too discernable to get.
I am grateful for your help anything helps even a few words. [:D]

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.07 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.