41
New Theories / Re: Do Black Holes turn into something like Quark Stars?
« on: 29/01/2024 18:09:50 »We know there are two things that define the type of star we get, mass and density in space time.That would result in a crude classification. Temperature would also be a significant factor, so I think the two-properties definition is incomplete.
Quote
As the mass increases and pressure then we get different types of stars that result in objects incredibly dense, such as a neutron star.Black holes and neutron stars are products of supernovas. They don't just happen as mass increases. Exception: A white dwarf can become a type 1A supernova just by adding mass. These explosions are all pretty much identical and are used as standard luminosity candles across the universe, very useful for measuring distances accurately.
Quote
This is at a point where the density becomes so high that it overcomes the electrostatic repulsion between protons, allowing them to merge with electrons to form neutrons.This assumes compression going on, and yes, supernovas are caused by compression, usually from a collapse of some kind, but not always.
The pattern here seems to be that with increasing density, pressure and mass the atomic bonds of atoms themselves are altered under these conditions creating these dense objects.
Quote
I see a black hole as just another type of star, a star where the density, mass and pressure have reached a point where it causes the particles in the atoms to become so squashed together that it allows for the creation of this super dense object aka a black hole.Not really. A black hole lacks the pressure. The geometery of one tends to pull things apart rather than squish them together. It is misleading to think of them as stars that are even more dense. They're not.
Quote
I think the idea of infinite mass is just silly.If the universe is not of finite size, and has nonzero mass density, then it has to have infinite mass. That's not silly, it's unavoidable. It seems you might be in denial of an infinite universe, but there's nothing contradictory about it.
Quote
Black holes lose energy though Hawking radiation until it is thought they just kind of evaporate away. However I say that is not the case and cannot be the case.Is this topic a speculation then? I will move it to where speculations go since you're pushing personal beliefs.
Quote
What must happen is that after the density of the Black hole reaches a critical pointThey don't have a density at all. For that, you'd need a meaningful volume. It does have a meaningful mass (that and charge and angular momentum. No more).