1

That CAN'T be true! / do acids reduce metals?

« on: 28/09/2016 01:30:23 »

Fluoroantimonic acid has the chemical formula HSbF₆, and a molar mass of 236.76 g/mol. It is a very strong acid, in that it is capable of protonating almost anything, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is the best at dissolving (eating through) materials.

I don't think that metals like steel are soluble in HSbF₆, and protonating steel won't change its solubility, so really the question at hand is one about the chemical reactions:

HSbF₆ --> H⁺ + SbF₆^–
and
Fe + 2 H⁺ --> Fe⁺⁺ + H₂

These reactions indicate the dissociation of the acid into free protons (hydronium ions) and hexafluoroantimonate ions, and the reaction of protons with metallic iron (steel), resulting in soluble ferrous ions and hydrogen gas.

Based on this stoichiometry, it would take 2 moles of  acid to react with one mole of iron (molar mass of 56 g/mol). One kg of the acid contains just over 4 moles (1000/236.76 = 4.22 moles), so this would eat away 2.11 moles of iron, or roughly 120 grams.

In contrast, one kg of sulfuric acid, which is H₂SO₄, could consume roughly 560 grams of iron. Sulfuric acid is no where near as "strong" based on dissociation constant, but it has a much higher concentration of reactive protons per unit mass.

i hope this helps!

If you heat most acids they become more potent, sulfuric is one of them. It can reduce many metals like aluminum in seconds or minutes once it is hot. But it does not effect steel 55 gallon drums very much even when hot.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

2

New Theories / some nonsense removed from another post

« on: 25/09/2016 21:50:19 »

Electrostatics is traditionally defined as the study of the behaviour of ‘charged particles’ that have been separated from each other. As the neutron and the neutrino do not have charge, it is primarily the study of electron and proton separation, although positrons and anti-protons can also figure.

The basic concept behind electrostatics is that oppositely charged particles, function together under the influence of an electrostatic field, being attracted or repelled according to an interaction between like with like charges and like with unlike charges.

So what role does kinetic energy have in the study of static electricity?
 
The link arises during the process of removing an electron from its host atom. It is a process which imparts kinetic energy to the extracted electrons in order to remove them from their atomic orbit around the nucleus.

The use of friction between two dissimilar materials, referred to as the ‘triboelectric effect’, provides an example of this input of kinetic energy, but once extracted, the electron does not show itself as having kinetic energy that is associated with the movement of the electron through space, but through an increase in the electron’s ‘static vibrational energy’.

In electrostatic experiments conducted in the lab, the electrons, once freed from their atom, can be physically transferred and stored upon a ‘non-conducting’ surface or alternatively, upon an insulated ‘conducting’ surface. The depositing of the electrons onto this storage medium brings the energised vibrating electrons into close contact with each other, but it is their individual vibrations, rather than their charge, which initially keeps them apart.

But as the numbers of electrons continue to stack up on the finite surface area of the storage medium, they begin to cramp each other’s space. The electrons cope with this by synchronising their vibrations to make the best use of the horizontal space available to them and storing newly arrived electrons on top of each other, when the surface area is fully utilised.
 
The deeper and denser that the layers of electrons become, the greater is their synchronised vibrational energy, until a critical energy level is reached, at which the 'vibrations' of the energised electrons are able to interact with the electrons of the atoms in the surrounding non-conducting medium.

This vibrational contact affects the electron pairings located in each atom’s outer orbit, causing the electron pair to be split apart and dispatching one of the electron pair into a higher energy state. Because both electrons remain as part of the atom, the atom is not ionised, but the division creates a free electron in the atom’s new outer orbit and this starts the temporary conversion of the non-conducting medium into a conducting one.

Repetitive quantum strikes of kinetic energy passing from the stored electrons into the non-conducting medium continues to separate paired electrons, with the process moving from molecule to molecule away from the source, albeit in the manner of a ‘random walk’.

Each ‘pair splitting’ event absorbs an input of vibrational energy from the electron store. But the distance that it travels through the non-conducting medium can fizzle out, if the driving force from the transmitted electron vibrations is depleted or siphoned off in another direction. This same cessation of ‘pair splitting’, also happens when the path of a ‘pair splitting’ process is impeded by an object, such as an earthed terminal or an object upon the earth itself and this causes the path to deliver its remaining vibrational energy onto that blocking object.
 
However, the ending of a 'pair splitting path' initiates a reversal of the process, whereby the energised outer electron of each ‘split pair’ is now able to fall back into its original orbital level, emitting a flash of visible light. This enables the split pair to re-join again and returns the medium back into its non-conducting state.
 
The traditional concept of the electron as having an associated ‘charge’ and being mediated by an ‘electrostatic field’, is not a requirement of this electrostatic ‘lightning strike’ phenomenon.
 
The concept of ‘static vibrational energy’ is also relevant in the field of electrodynamics, where traditionally the creation of an electric current in a conducting circuit is viewed as the result of the physical movement of charged electrons along a conducting wire under the influence of an electrostatic field.

The transport of an electric current around a conducting circuit by the means of ‘vibrating electrons’, is driven by the input of quantum units of kinetic energy, that are vibrated into the circuit by a generating source, whether it is a battery, a dynamo, mechanical friction or the sun’s radiant energy.

Each quantum input of energy is transmitted around the circuit using the conducting 'free electrons' as its vehicle. These free electrons are located in the outer orbit of every atom of the conducting circuit and together they provide a direct conduit through the lattice structure of the conducting wire.

Once the vibration from the input kinetic energy has been transmitted from one electron to the next in a sequential manner, the electrons in the circuit each return to their original state, enabling them to transmit the next quantum unit of vibrational kinetic energy. The voltage at any point upon the conducting circuit, is just a measurement of the kinetic energy that is being transported past that point.

These two phenomena from the fields of electrostatics and electrodynamics, which are in essence the same process of transmitting kinetic energy through a medium, are not underpinned by the existence of a ‘universal electric force field’ that mediates the interaction between charged particles, but are explained more simply by the ‘generation’, ‘storage’ and ‘transfer’ of kinetic energy.

No one has ever demonstrated unlike particles attracting, or even come up with any feasible theory for that premise. The reason is that there are no attraction forces in our universe. This was proven a century ago and no one ever disputed it with any sane explanation.

The French Scientist Du Fay had the notion that there were two types of particles of electricity, one positive and one negative. But Benjamin Franklin squashed that after great debate, and putting an end to English Children having to go to church bell towers to ward off lightning, with his lightning rod.

There is no proof of such a notion of two different particles attracting, no explanation that does not crumble into madness. So it still stands for those that enjoy the truth that all particles repel one another, under universal pressure. Which can be demonstrated. Electricity flows from an abundance of particles of electricity to a shortage of particles of electricity without exception. Even the mystical ARC (Anode, Rectified, Cathode) is nothing more than a blown capacitor emitting particles of electricity against the flow of the power supply that created them. Electricity from an ARC, like lightning is not an A to B flow of electricity. It is an A to B to C flow of electricity. The interesting difference between the two types of flows, is that an A to be B flow, flows only from A to B. While the A to B to C flow the ARC, lightning, can move to any location of lower voltage. The ARC is as close to a bomb as you can get, if it is not a bomb. The energy created at the point the ARC starts is at disintegration voltage, that means it can go just about anywhere. By disintegration voltage I mean the voltage as in a blasting cap that can cause otherwise non-explosive substances to explode. Asphalt can be made to explode with high voltage, much like a high explosive. As kids we made electrochemical detonators to blow up the streets. They were impressive. With only a couple grams we could detonate a three foot diameter area of asphalt roadway, three or four inches in depth, right down to the cement underneath. I am not suggesting this behavior in any way, looking back just holding them or making them was a bit foolish.

The lightning rod creates an area very high in voltage, the lightning, the ARC is repelled to another location of lesser abundance of particles of electricity, or sometimes it does not even strike the ground.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

3

New Theories / Effect of magnetic field on cable insulation

« on: 17/09/2016 21:47:51 »

One effect magnets can have is that they can allow electrical fields to permeate insulators. The skin is an insulator. So by hanging a powerful magnet around someones arm, this could allow electrical effects to permeate the skin. What effect electric could have on the blood is a guess.

I know that radiation and powerful electrical current can cause plasma to separate out of the blood. A sort of platting operation. Sometimes the body when under constant attack really kicks in and steps up repairs.

Sincerely,

Wiliam McCormick

4

That CAN'T be true! / Old Method Of Preserving Life

« on: 17/09/2016 17:29:50 »

http://www.rockwelder.com/health/gas.pdf

If you read carefully you will notice that they say the gas as in soda water. Soda water gas is somewhat immediately asphyxiating because it is mixed with water and is a rather powerful acid, when applied to wetted skin. That is why it can burn your nose and cause kids to gage or pull away from the gas above the soda.

Pure carbon dioxide is not immediately asphyxiating, I have used it in massive quantity to freeze leaking pipes and it is actually rather nice to breath, even when mixed with water vapor, from a tank of liquid carbon dioxide. However CO2 that is allowed to mix with water over time forms the substance carbonic acid. This substance when released from lake beds has killed whole villages of people.

I have noted that carbon dioxide that is put into and stored in cylinders as a gas, but was originally from very pure carbon dioxide is very immediately asphyxiating. So the oxygen it picks up from the cylinder walls makes it rather unpleasant to breath. As I mentioned though the pure CO2 from tanks of the liquid CO2 are rather pleasant to breath, for as much as 10 minutes time by actual experience.

I believe it is the impurities and lack of understanding of carbon dioxide in its many forms both pre and post storage as a gas that has caused it to fall out of favor.

However it appears at one time it was very useful for reviving those that we would have really called dead today. Carbonic acid is the substance that causes the lungs to involuntarily pump air into and out of the lung.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

5

That CAN'T be true! / Can lavender Potassium Permanganate be used as a radiation antidote?

« on: 05/09/2016 02:48:38 »

Crystallization is a very good way to purify substances (as a chemist, I take advantage of this quite frequently!) With the exception of compounds that co-crystallize (in which case the crystal will have a very well-defined ratio of the components), almost all crystals are nearly pure substances. The crystal structure has little room for deviation from perfect repetition of its unit cell.

Essentially, you can think of it like so: as the crystal is growing, dissolved (or molten) molecules or ions bump into the side of the crystal. If they happen to fit just right, they will stick and be incorporated into the crystal, and if not, they will just bounce off and go back into solution (or melt). Even water molecules will most bounce off of the growing ice crystal--they have to hit at just the right angle and just the right position with just the right speed to stick, but non-water molecules or ions have no chance of being incorporated in the crystal. If the crystal forms too quickly, it can have defects, and potentially contain impurities, but if it is still crystalline, then it must be quite close to pure and perfect.

A corollary to this is that mixtures of substances are much harder to crystallize. This is essentially the reason behind why salt melts ice (salt+water is harder to freeze than pure water, and therefore salt+ice is easier to melt than pure ice). Ice will also melt very quickly if exposed to absolute alcohol (and will get very cold!) and vodka won't freeze until it gets below –25°C.

Hope this helps!

In most cases like potassium permanganate and copper sulfate the crystal formed from a solution of water and either substance creates the hydrous form or hydrous crystal. So you have to be careful when experimenting, because the crystal is not pure. The anhydrous form is more pure. Often we use the anhydrous form to create the solution. And end up with the hydrous crystal.

Years ago the hydrous potassium permanganate was sold as an oral treatment for radiation poisoning in local drug stores. The crystals are a pale lavender color, while the pure potassium permanganate is a deep dark almost black substance. You have to be careful with potassium permanganate it reacts with glycerin to create heat and flame, or violent explosion if contained in a high pressure container. Either the hydrate or the anhydrous. The anhydrous is much more powerful.

We used to buy it and use it in combination with glycerin to create time delay ignition devices, by separating the potassium permanganate from the glycerin with a few paper napkins that took time to pass the glycerin. I would not fool around with that method though for bomb making, using high pressure vessels. It is not reliable enough.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

6

New Theories / Single submatter particle theory

« on: 31/08/2016 07:14:11 »

You can actually take a BB for a kids BB gun. And fire the BB at a piece of thin metal, that is angled one degree off parallel from the barrel. And you will see that the BB can impart quite a force to the piece of metal. The reason is the BB does not wish to change direction. That is all that is happening in a centrifuge. The stuff in the pump wants to move tangent to the spinning pump. And it does, causing pumping action.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

   Evidently it appears that an object in motion has a gravitational field that must be spinning perpendicular to the motion. this would insure that the BB keeps on a straight path even though the physical BB may not spin. I will post that question soon.

I was taught that there was one sub matter particle the particle of electricity. The hydrogen atom the atom that builds all other elements was taught to me as being a sphere of particles of electricity. Ambient radiation races through all matter from all directions to all directions simultaneously. Ambient radiation was taught to me as being particles of electricity at a very high velocity.

In order for something to move, an abundance of particles of electricity or a shortage of particles of electricity must be created by a change in matter, in order to cause movement. The matter having no energy of its own, only structure, acts like a sail in the wind of ambient radiation. So when something is set in motion, it must be charged, there must be an abundance of particles of electricity created and a shortage. The movement can only be from an abundance to a shortage.

An ARC sets up a shortage of particles of electricity, by beaming away from the object arcing an abundance of particles of electricity, by way of light. Light speed or light velocity particles of electricity, remove more particles of electricity than electricity itself. Light also removes heat very quickly more quickly than heat or infrared does. So when something is set in motion, in front of the object it creates an excited path, often reducing air pressure allowing a projectile to travel through air more easily. This is just something that can be witnessed, the actual is invisible to us, however it works much the same way.

Lead is known to absorb high frequency electricity, become short of particles of electricity when exposed to a plasma, an arc. So a high velocity projectile will be found to be short of particles of electricity in the rear of the moving projectile, however the front of the projectile will be abundant with particles of electricity. Because of the ARC that forms in the front. The light removes particles of electricity faster than electricity itself.

If you have ever tried to press a lead slug through a steel plate you know you are wasting your time. The lead will compress and never penetrate the steel, even when tons of pressure are applied. Yet a lead bullet can pierce steel easily when it hits a certain velocity, with only its momentum.

When several of the same lead rounds, the same projectiles are fired at different velocities at the same steel target, you will note strange phenomena occur at different velocities. One of the projectiles with a low powder charge, will not even scratch the paint on a steel plate when fired at a close range, the round is turned into almost microscopic bits of lead. Yet that round is known to have killed men at that range. As we up the amount of powder or increase the length of the barrel the round is being fired out of, we see the lead round can now bend the metal, impress it. Something that a large hammer and a heavy swing cannot do. Finally as we fire a round from a long barrel, with a lot of powder, we now cut a perfect hole in the steel plate with a lead bullet. There is evidence of a plasma type cut. Light can often be witnessed as the round approaches the steel plate.

In all the cases above, we were firing a round through air, as the round approaches the metal plate, air pressure is created between the bullet and the metal plate. Causing a visible arc. It is the visible arc, that cuts the steel, it is not the raw horse power pressing a hole in the steel. From watching actual detectable phenomena we can form some hypothesis about how an object moves through the paths of so many particles of ambient radiation, and still wishes to maintain a straight path through them. The motion appears to setup up oriented phenomena, which changes things around the moving object.

From my teachings gravity is the effect of more and less repulsion. Benjamin Franklin long before the revolution created a static drive motor to turn a turkey spit. It would run for twenty minutes, from a few strokes of a glass jar. Using an arc and repulsion to both move the motor and to maintain a charge in the capacitors. Although these are visible ARC's the same effects happen with magnets, and other types of movement. I am not answering you or giving you an answer I am just sharing another view point that seems to work and can be demonstrated rather easily.

Benjamin Franklin used to use static electricity and the river to instantly kill the turkey for the spit, which he suggested his King the King of England could benefit from such electrical treatments. So you may gather the truth about real science is always at the cost of falling out of favor from the kings court. The reason Benjamin Franklin had differences with the king was because the kings Royal academy under his control claimed that lightning rods could not work, because lightning was not the same as the arc of static electricity. English children were forced to the church bell towers to ring the bell to ward off lighting during lightning storms. It often removed such honest young lads from God's service. The less honest sorts to speak the truth about a disingenuous king the merrier.

Today our electricity suffers from "raise it down" and "lower it up". So good honest kids that really love electricity never have verbal or written tools to investigate it. The ARC (Anode, Rectified, Cathode) is no longer taught. It can save your life if you know what it is and what it is capable of. These are the hurdles that we face, not the actual science. Science was completed a very long time ago. It took artificial wars, famine and even the unspeakable taxation (slavery) to undo it.

Sincerely,

William McCormick

7

That CAN'T be true! / View on particle detection

« on: 28/08/2016 05:32:34 »

One atom of electricity, is not going to register in your eye, a sensor, or on anything else. It takes an infinite number of particles of electricity (light) to create or relay an effect.

Individual subatomic particles are being detected all the time:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintillator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger_counter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photomultiplier

That would be comical if we were not so arrogant and missing the boat when identifying reality from crazy dreams.

The modern scientist does not understand infinite.
Passing by a single atom in a fraction of a fraction of a second, there are an infinite number of particles of electricity creating, stabilizing the atom, and then carrying information about the atom it just contacted onward. Information about location, distance to the next atom in its vicinity, the temperature, the light present, x-rays present, you name it that one single particles velocity carries information about where it has been. However one particle is worthless. The reality is a weighted average of an infinite number of particles passing by that single atom. As I stated it takes an infinite number of particles to bring your eye up to a point it can sense light from the smallest aperture that is practical to transmit light.

The lie is so apparent most are afraid to call the liar out, because he is either very sick (insane) or some kind of sober serial killer, with the backing of almost all governments on earth. Which the governments if push comes to shove will blame you the citizen because they said they were going to miseducate you, your children and everyone else. The real world is a mean rugged place if you have the stomach for it. Demonstrate one particle bringing you a picture. Demonstrate one particle being picked out of an infinite number of particles. When that seems insane you are on the right path.

The smallest micro chip on earth is barbaric in structure and texture, to the atoms size.

We know that all matter elements, in pure form are bonded by a siamese bond to themselves. Yet that bond cannot be viewed by an electron microscope. That is because the electron microscope as I have mentioned needs an infinite number of particles to register an image to the electron microscope. So although they get images of a tiddy looking structure, from say gold, they are not even seeing a single atom. They are seeing a pattern created by the structure of the substance under the electron microscope, created by an infinite number or particles of electricity passing through it. But they are not seeing the atom. We reached the maximum we will ever be able to perceive of the atomic world back in the sixties. The best laid it to rest, by stating "We will never be able to see it. And no instrument will ever record it." They were not slow or stupid, they were highly accurate and not chasing fairy dust.

Those looking for papers and approval from houses of counterintelligence bought and paid for by a known corrupt government which of course is not science, are chasing fairy dust. Science, reality is in your garage basement or apartment for observation.


Sincerely,

William McCormick