1
Chemistry / Re: Shrink ray or growth ray, how could they work?
« Last post by Eternal Student on Today at 13:31:53 »Hi.
I agree that it would be nice to change nature's ε0 for the universe in some local region around the person. However, that's not something we can easily do and engineers hate it when you ask them to do the impossible.
What we have a real opportunity to do, is to change the di-electric or pactical ε in the environment around the atoms.
In the hydrogenic model of semiconductors, it seems that the radius of space occupied by the electron from a donor impurity does behave as if the di-electric ε of the bulk material is being used instead of nature's vaccum ε0. (and also, the efective mass of the electron rather than its natural rest mass). We've had discussions about this before (nearly a year ago):
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86760.msg722228#msg722228
Sadly one of the links I gave to a Glasgow university website seems to be down (things change in a year). Here's a snippet of a lecture course (Solidstate Physics) from the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom that briefly describes how the usual Schrodinger QM model of a Hydrogen atom is modified - just so you know that there really is some precedent here. Donor impurity atoms do seem to behave as if they're bigger and it is exactly as if the dielectric ε and the effective mass of the electron in the bulk material is being used in the QM model of an atom.
Best Wishes.
but the volume occupied by the constituents of an atom is filled by vacuum 0, not d.
I agree that it would be nice to change nature's ε0 for the universe in some local region around the person. However, that's not something we can easily do and engineers hate it when you ask them to do the impossible.
What we have a real opportunity to do, is to change the di-electric or pactical ε in the environment around the atoms.
In the hydrogenic model of semiconductors, it seems that the radius of space occupied by the electron from a donor impurity does behave as if the di-electric ε of the bulk material is being used instead of nature's vaccum ε0. (and also, the efective mass of the electron rather than its natural rest mass). We've had discussions about this before (nearly a year ago):
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86760.msg722228#msg722228
Sadly one of the links I gave to a Glasgow university website seems to be down (things change in a year). Here's a snippet of a lecture course (Solidstate Physics) from the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom that briefly describes how the usual Schrodinger QM model of a Hydrogen atom is modified - just so you know that there really is some precedent here. Donor impurity atoms do seem to behave as if they're bigger and it is exactly as if the dielectric ε and the effective mass of the electron in the bulk material is being used in the QM model of an atom.
Best Wishes.