The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. Is this the answer to cheap electricity?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is this the answer to cheap electricity?

  • 2 Replies
  • 662 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline alancalverd (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14251
  • Activity:
    95.5%
  • Thanked: 1080 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Is this the answer to cheap electricity?
« on: 25/07/2021 23:31:51 »
I mentioned in these forums that EON, among others, seem to be misleading potential customers by advertising "100% renewable electricity at no extra cost". So I wrote to them asking how they could justify their claim, since right now  only 10% of grid input is from renewables and EON supply around 20% of total demand.

I just received an excellent reply. They buy some of their electricity from 100% renewable generators, and don't charge the customer according to the source of whatever they supply. So the advert is literally true but obviously misleading.

So I have replied thus:

"Some of the stuff in my pockets is 100% Bank of England currency. In future I will pay my bill with whatever comes to hand at the time - banknotes, old surgical masks, shopping lists, parking fine notices, etc. Thus, exactly as you calculate the renewable electricity supplied to me, in full and final settlement of your bill, you will receive 100% legal tender and a fair bit of scrap paper to cover the remaining 90% of the invoice. If you do not agree to this arrangement, I will refer the matter to the Advertising Standards Authority."
« Last Edit: 26/07/2021 12:33:38 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Online Eternal Student

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 934
  • Activity:
    44.5%
  • Thanked: 177 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this the answer to cheap electricity?
« Reply #1 on: 26/07/2021 00:56:35 »
Hi  Alancalverd, I hope you are well.

  Well, this looks like a poor show from EON.  It does seem to be dishonest and thoroughly misleading.
The comments they put on their website are equally misleading.
 
Good luck with your letter.
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2454
  • Activity:
    25%
  • Thanked: 94 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Is this the answer to cheap electricity?
« Reply #2 on: 26/07/2021 10:00:27 »
Lol.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: cheap  / dishonest 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.087 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.