0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If one considers the possibility that space is filled with gravitational waves, and that they are absorbed and emitted by matter, then the density of the wave energy in space is related to the proximity of matter, quite like general relativity. Except spacetime doesn't have to stretch and curve; space just has to be filled with gravitational wave energy density at varying levels related to the ever changing motion of particles and objects (perhaps).
... the same amount of time relative to the invariant rate that time passes regardless of what our clocks might suggest.
Though the same amount of "invariant universal time" passed for the marble that was falling in each fluid, the higher density of the oil fluid slowed the rate, as the higher wave energy density for a moving clock causes it to run slower.
I 'see' that space is filled with energy in the forms of fields, I believe these fields to be linear .
For example, a volume of space has three dimensions, and every point in that volume of space is an individual point in the field, where all points make up the entire field structure. Linear, in that sense, might mean that every point in space is connected to the entire space by its relationship with each surrounding point in any linear direction or vector. Does that sound right to you, in regard to fields being linear?
Every point of space is connected to every point of space. We can look at any direction expanding away from any individual point and consider a linearity between the point and any distant point. Now this linear can be also looked at isotropic from the point, that makes up a spherical field that is a linearity in all directions.
I mean for what reason [h]as this field to wave?
Now to me, if anything acts on the linear field, like a stationary jelly it wobbles (waves).
But I suppose with space, there is something always acting on fields so fields always wave.
I imagine a carrier signal that travels in a linearity, but if it encounters resistance it waves. I think the electromagnetic radiation traversing through space is not a wave but can wave. A 0 constant that allows slower signals to be detected as a wave.
since I suspect is it outside the scope of your paper
tp0.jpg (23.51 kB . 898x572 - viewed 4135 times) lorentz1.jpg (14.2 kB . 985x507 - viewed 4064 times)
Quote from: Thebox on 16/01/2018 21:27:21 tp0.jpg (23.51 kB . 898x572 - viewed 4135 times) lorentz1.jpg (14.2 kB . 985x507 - viewed 4064 times)Interesting. Reminds me of a very poor copy of Kandinsky.
No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics.
Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:35:10No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics. So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it. If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question, How much length is there between your now time and your next now time? I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?
Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 12:53:15Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:35:10No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics. So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it. If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question, How much length is there between your now time and your next now time? I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you? That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention.
Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:58:06Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 12:53:15Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:35:10No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics. So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it. If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question, How much length is there between your now time and your next now time? I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you? That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention. Like I thought, you avoided the question because you know the answer contradicts time dilation and length contraction.
Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 13:08:41Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:58:06Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 12:53:15Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:35:10No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics. So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it. If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question, How much length is there between your now time and your next now time? I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you? That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention. Like I thought, you avoided the question because you know the answer contradicts time dilation and length contraction. I avoided the question because it makes no sense. It has more in common with Alice in Wonderland than any kind of science. You are consistent in this though aren't you? Putting a 'question' that makes no sense so you can crow that you are right. Like Zippy in Rainbow.
Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 17:08:37Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 13:08:41Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:58:06Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 12:53:15Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:35:10No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics. So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it. If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question, How much length is there between your now time and your next now time? I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you? That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention. Like I thought, you avoided the question because you know the answer contradicts time dilation and length contraction. I avoided the question because it makes no sense. It has more in common with Alice in Wonderland than any kind of science. You are consistent in this though aren't you? Putting a 'question' that makes no sense so you can crow that you are right. Like Zippy in Rainbow. Your so funny, reminds me of an immigrant getting stopped by the police with the ''I no understand''. It is a simple question in plane English which we both know destroys time dilation myths.
Quote from: Thebox on 23/01/2018 09:26:14Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 17:08:37Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 13:08:41Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:58:06Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 12:53:15Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:35:10No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics. So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it. If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question, How much length is there between your now time and your next now time? I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you? That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention. Like I thought, you avoided the question because you know the answer contradicts time dilation and length contraction. I avoided the question because it makes no sense. It has more in common with Alice in Wonderland than any kind of science. You are consistent in this though aren't you? Putting a 'question' that makes no sense so you can crow that you are right. Like Zippy in Rainbow. Your so funny, reminds me of an immigrant getting stopped by the police with the ''I no understand''. It is a simple question in plane English which we both know destroys time dilation myths. 'your now time and your next now time' is Lewis Carol humpty dumpty language. But hats off to you for incorporating border line racism into your last reply. I was wondering what 'plane English' is? Is it what pilots use to communicate?
Quote from: The Spoon on 23/01/2018 18:06:35Quote from: Thebox on 23/01/2018 09:26:14Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 17:08:37Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 13:08:41Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:58:06Quote from: Thebox on 22/01/2018 12:53:15Quote from: The Spoon on 22/01/2018 12:35:10No, but at least he had other redeeming qualities like being good at physics. So do I, it is not my fault that most people in the world do not have the brain power to understand or can even have a good debate about the content provided. I am only about 7 years in, I am sure by another 7 years I will explain it much more simplified for those who do not get it. If you were as smart as you think you are, then you should be able to answer this very simple question, How much length is there between your now time and your next now time? I suggest there is no length it is immediate ahead?If you would use generally accepted terms people may be able to understand you. As you insist defining things to suit your nutty ideas how do you expect people to understand you? That said, over 7 years you have been shown to be consistently wrong on a whole range of subjects and to just be seeking attention. Like I thought, you avoided the question because you know the answer contradicts time dilation and length contraction. I avoided the question because it makes no sense. It has more in common with Alice in Wonderland than any kind of science. You are consistent in this though aren't you? Putting a 'question' that makes no sense so you can crow that you are right. Like Zippy in Rainbow. Your so funny, reminds me of an immigrant getting stopped by the police with the ''I no understand''. It is a simple question in plane English which we both know destroys time dilation myths. 'your now time and your next now time' is Lewis Carol humpty dumpty language. But hats off to you for incorporating border line racism into your last reply. I was wondering what 'plane English' is? Is it what pilots use to communicate? Have you never watched Uk customs programs or police programs? There is no racism in the truth.Anyway I assume you know what a chronological position is!I want you to start at 0, what length away is your next chronological position?