0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
gravity is thought to wrap twice around light, to produce kinetic energy.
black box radiation
how does gravity escape a BH?
photonic light is believed to exist at the 10^-19 powergravity is is believed to exist at the 10^-39 power.in linear momentum, gravity is thought to wrap twice around light, to produce kinetic energy.as the kinetic energy of light and gravity is captured and attempts to escape outward from the black hole,light having a higher energy is retained by a higher winding of gravity. the black hole acts as a gravity winding multiplier to the gravity component within kinetic energy. the gravity of the black hole, traps light in the accretion disk around the black hole's horizon.gravity by virtue of its low 10^-39 energy can escape the black holes gravity.this takes the analogous form of a black box radiation, oozing gravity. the accretion disk radiates the outward attraction of gravity, much in the same manner that a black box radiates thermodynamic heat outward but produces no light. the gravity of the black hole itself, strips the kinetic energy of the light and gravityinto two separate components. light by virtue of it's higher energy remains trapped.the gravity of the kinetic energy escapes via a analogous black box gravity radiation.
Quote from: esquire on 03/03/2019 19:09:44photonic light is believed to exist at the 10^-19 powergravity is is believed to exist at the 10^-39 power.in linear momentum, gravity is thought to wrap twice around light, to produce kinetic energy.as the kinetic energy of light and gravity is captured and attempts to escape outward from the black hole,light having a higher energy is retained by a higher winding of gravity. the black hole acts as a gravity winding multiplier to the gravity component within kinetic energy. the gravity of the black hole, traps light in the accretion disk around the black hole's horizon.gravity by virtue of its low 10^-39 energy can escape the black holes gravity.this takes the analogous form of a black box radiation, oozing gravity. the accretion disk radiates the outward attraction of gravity, much in the same manner that a black box radiates thermodynamic heat outward but produces no light. the gravity of the black hole itself, strips the kinetic energy of the light and gravityinto two separate components. light by virtue of it's higher energy remains trapped.the gravity of the kinetic energy escapes via a analogous black box gravity radiation. What is your gravity? Is it Einstein's bending of spacetime?The aether explanation of gravity is that gravity is due to the acceleration of the aether inflow into mass where the aether is annihilated, the inflow streamlines converging towards the center of mass thusly giving a 1/RR relationship to the force. The aether inflow acceleration is such that the aether inflow might hit the surface of the mass at a speed equal to the escape velocity. At a BH that escape velocity will of course be greater than the speed of light at that surface (ie light cant escape). Note that i didnt say greater than c. Saying c can be confusing. Because c is usually taken to be the maximum speed of light in vacuum. Whereas when i said greater than the speed of light i meant the actual speed of light at that location, & the speed of light at that or any other location will be slowed by being near mass (in accordance with GR) & will be slowed by any atmosphere (eg plasma)(assuming that a BH can have an atmosphere).But the speed of the gravitational attraction of a BH is not a problem for aetherists like myself. We believe that the speed of the aether inflow is probly non-limited, aether can probly flow at speeds well above the speed of light. But anyhow the speed of the aether is not the issue, the issue is the speed of the shockwaves or pulses in the aether flow. Its a bit like comparing the speed of the wind to the speed of sound in air. The speed of "sound" in aether is we believe in excess of 20 billion c. For gravity to be trapped in a BH the speed of the aether inflow into the BH would havtabe greater than 20 billion c. I doubt that such a massive BH exists.Re Einsteinian BHs, i dont understand these. An Einsteinian BH hastabe massive enough such that light cant escape. But if very massive then the speed of light near the BH will be zero kmps. And if the speed of light near the BH is zero kmps then the Einsteinian BH doesnt need any mass at all, ie the needed mass is zero kg. So i guess that the needed mass for an Einsteinian BH is such that the speed of light near the BH is say c/2. If so then the BH need not be very massive, & probly need not be a singularity. In which case the BH would probly have an atmosphere, in which case the speed of light would be reduced by the nearness of mass plus the slowing in the atmosphere, a double dose of slowing, in which case the mass of the BH might need to be such that the speed of light near the BH is say c/4. But Einsteinians i think keep insisting that their BH hastahav an escape velocity of c. Go figure.
I thought the point was it doesnt dissipate, therefore it has a high gravity ?