0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:04:28Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 22:22:44You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.So there's no need for your made up N field.But that magnetic field is Neutral in charge is it not ? A N-field?
Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 22:22:44You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.So there's no need for your made up N field.
You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:08:39Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:04:28Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 22:22:44You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.So there's no need for your made up N field.But that magnetic field is Neutral in charge is it not ? A N-field? It's impossible to tell if it's an N field or not because you have yet to explain what one is.Every time someone asks you draw meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations.For what it's worth, an electric field, a magnetic field and a gravitational flied are all neutral- they have no net charge.So that, by your logic makes them all N fields.But they are clearly different.As I said- you make no sense.
I think it is quite obvious when I say A+B = N what is means Mr C.
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:28:26I think it is quite obvious when I say A+B = N what is means Mr C. Nobody else does.
Yes they do , because N = 0
Mr C, do I have to explain everything?
Imagine a Higg's field that was isometric but a negative energy -e, now any point sources of the ''matrix'' would be +1e , +1e would be just changing position in the field matrix , +1e being equally attracted forward as backwards.
Mr C, do I have to explain everything? Imagine a Higg's field that was isometric but a negative energy -e, now any point sources of the ''matrix'' would be +1e , +1e would be just changing position in the field matrix , +1e being equally attracted forward as backwards. I can approach this from lots of different angles Mr C, with boundaries and without boundaries considered.
Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:40:36Mr C, do I have to explain everything? Imagine a Higg's field that was isometric but a negative energy -e, now any point sources of the ''matrix'' would be +1e , +1e would be just changing position in the field matrix , +1e being equally attracted forward as backwards. I can approach this from lots of different angles Mr C, with boundaries and without boundaries considered. It would seem not when you are wittering away taliking constant crap. But then, as you pointed out, you are just here to troll.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:17:04Quote from: Thebox on 29/04/2018 21:08:39Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2018 21:04:28Quote from: Thebox on 28/04/2018 22:22:44You think it is not true that the Earth's field protects the Earth from solar winds and harmful radiation?The Earth's atmosphere and the magnetic field do that.So there's no need for your made up N field.But that magnetic field is Neutral in charge is it not ? A N-field? It's impossible to tell if it's an N field or not because you have yet to explain what one is.Every time someone asks you draw meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations.For what it's worth, an electric field, a magnetic field and a gravitational flied are all neutral- they have no net charge.So that, by your logic makes them all N fields.But they are clearly different.As I said- you make no sense.Dear TheboxWould you kindly stop? Enough is enough.There is no need for your "meaningless pictures or present nonsensical broken equations."You are more than welcome to open a new thread and set all your "brilliant" ideas