0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Where did you see this? I've never seen this in any textbook.Anyway your diagram shows 3 dimensions.
text book? I use my own head not text books, the diagram is a flat 1 dimensional view, I showed you this before in the third doodle
Never saw it.Anyway it is your view, not science's. And it is not one dimentional it shows 3. And it's wrong.
You are correct it is only two dimensions but what is a photon? If it always travels at c we have no c+ way of finding its physical makeup.
Quote from: Colin2B on 09/01/2016 18:52:36Never saw it.Anyway it is your view, not science's. And it is not one dimentional it shows 3. And it's wrong.Then you can explain why it is wrong?and where do you get three dimensions from?
Quote from: Thebox on 09/01/2016 21:49:24Quote from: Colin2B on 09/01/2016 18:52:36Never saw it.Anyway it is your view, not science's. And it is not one dimentional it shows 3. And it's wrong.Then you can explain why it is wrong?and where do you get three dimensions from? You obviously haven't worked it out yet!Ok, The view at the top of your picture shows a wave, which goes up and down (1 dimension)The plan view you show below is a straight line, but even though you don't show any movement it is still a dimension (2nd dimension)The left to right in your diagram shows time (3rd dimension) because the wave you show is only a graph of how it varies with time at any point in space.I say your diagram is wrong because light waves consist of an electric field and a magnetic field at right angles to each other, so your front and plan views should both show waves to indicate how these 2 field strengths vary with time.
we will start with a 10 cm length, and from a 1d aspect we will draw several different wavelengths in/of the 10 10cm.We will then look at the plan view the 2 dimension, (from above),we observe ten 10cm straight lines because in the 2d view we can not observe the troths or peaks,
I just remembered my original thought, a wavelength does not change take two equal lines A and BA=..................................................B=..................................................Both lengths are equalwe will now add two different wave formationsA=....-...............-...........-.........-......B=..-...-...-...-..-...-...-....-...-..-....-....The length is still the same, we now have wave-width though,....a Y axis or x axis relative to view.
Quote from: Thebox on 14/01/2016 04:41:12I just remembered my original thought, a wavelength does not change take two equal lines A and BA=..................................................B=..................................................Both lengths are equalwe will now add two different wave formationsA=....-...............-...........-.........-......B=..-...-...-...-..-...-...-....-...-..-....-....The length is still the same, we now have wave-width though,....a Y axis or x axis relative to view.For the top 2 lines we don't know what the wavelength is as you haven't put a wave in!The wavelength is just the distance for a complete cycle so if the waves A and B both complete a cycle in the same length then they are equal.In the bottom example, yes you are showing pulse widths. If the pulses show a repeating pattern then they will have a wavelength, you could also take the average wavelength.The 2 pulse trains A and B would also be described as having different duty cycles. That is the proportion of time that the pulses are either +ve or -ve. For example a square wave would be described as having a 50% duty cycle.
In the top two the lengths are equal, if we measure a 10cm section of light, the waves may be different but the 10cm remains 10cm no matter what the wave is doing.
Quote from: Thebox on 14/01/2016 14:56:23In the top two the lengths are equal, if we measure a 10cm section of light, the waves may be different but the 10cm remains 10cm no matter what the wave is doing.Ok, so 10cm=10cm.However if the second wave is 15cm wavelength all you have done is measure part of the wave.
Waves represent a quantum system's behavior reacting to "up-resonances" emanating from an underlying ether matrix.Quantum systems do not produce linearity on their own. -Our earth-world's quantum setting allows us to observe quantum wave effects, but they are not the answer to understanding linear transmissions. Quantum systems are composed of units of varying size, and behave according to spin/vector dyamics, which do not lend themselves to linear transmission. The only possible mechanism for linear transmission is that it occurs within an underlying etheric matrix, where the matching size of the elemental energic units, plus their intimate proximity, produce linear transmissions, as entrainments (as elemental units vibrate and form loose connections with each other.)
The waves that are seen in quantum systems represent a "shoreline effect" when up-resonations, starting from the tiniest scale units, elemental etheric units, filter up to etheroidal, then finally to the largest scale units, the quantum units.This wave effect is analogous to the waves appearing when ocean systems send breaking waves to the shoreline. The "shoreline" in the case of energy resonances would be where the vibrational property of etheric resonances transition fully to the spin-vector dynamics of quantum systems.Occasionally, an etheroidal unit "escapes" suddenly and prematurely from its vibrational mechanism and unexpectedly appears in specially-designed quantum energy systems. That would account for so-called "quasiparticles."