The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is infinitely big inversely equal to infinitely small?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is infinitely big inversely equal to infinitely small?

  • 1 Replies
  • 3260 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 20 times
    • View Profile
Is infinitely big inversely equal to infinitely small?
« on: 13/07/2012 22:30:01 »
Ernest Kahn  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Hi Chris,
 
I listen to 702 on Fridays.
 
My question is; is infinitely big inversely equal to infinitely small ? (in terms of the outer universe v the small particles )
 
Regards
Ernest Kahn
JHB, South Africa

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 13/07/2012 22:30:01 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • View Profile
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Re: Is infinitely big inversely equal to infinitely small?
« Reply #1 on: 13/07/2012 23:37:30 »
The concept of infinitely anything is strictly only a mathematical concept and cannot relate to the observable physical world.  Using it for physical situations creates all sorts of pointless paradoxes.  Indefinitely large and negligibly small are probably the best terms to use in many cases.

Whilst I agree that reciprocal relationships (that is relationships where as one thing grows another gets smaller) are extremely important in physical science.  Taking them to the mathematical limit does not in general add anything to an extreme non limiting case.

reciprocal relationships are a very interesting case of an equation, where the product of two parameters equals a constant
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

When does 26x1½ not equal 26x1.5?

Started by CliffordKBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 9
Views: 8183
Last post 07/08/2011 22:46:35
by Geezer
Does 1 second of time equal 0 time?

Started by guest39538Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 21
Views: 8610
Last post 04/05/2016 15:13:59
by guest39538
Is 1 second equal to 3 seconds or 1/3 seconds?

Started by FruityloopBoard That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 11
Views: 5949
Last post 19/08/2016 10:32:05
by Fruityloop
Why do small dogs yap but big dogs bark?

Started by thedocBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 1
Views: 5614
Last post 15/12/2016 09:14:25
by chris
Why are small bubbles white, but large bubbles are see through?

Started by thedocBoard Chemistry

Replies: 2
Views: 4037
Last post 16/10/2013 15:13:48
by dlorde
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.087 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.