0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ha ha, now everyone has to deal with my Particles-are-not-Points-Theory.
My model says they are not points. My model says exactly what they are. My model is falsifiable just by measuring the Electromagnetic field of the free electron.
Does your model predict a field which is different from that predicted by conventional physics?
Yes it predicts a different field from that of a point charge moving in a straight line
Quote from: Bored chemist on 12/08/2021 13:02:33Does your model predict a field which is different from that predicted by conventional physics?Yes it predicts a different field from that of a point charge moving in a straight line, at least close to the electron. The electric field tends to zero far away from the electron.
That's interesting because, if the experimentally observed paths of electron (for example in TV sets and electron microscopes
Quote from: Bored chemist on 12/08/2021 18:28:00That's interesting because, if the experimentally observed paths of electron (for example in TV sets and electron microscopesThe field is different at 10-100 fm from the electron. Those things are of macroscopic dimensions, of order 1 m, where the field aught to be the same.
The OP thinks that we use electron microscopes to observe thing whose size is of the order of a metre.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/08/2021 13:42:15The OP thinks that we use electron microscopes to observe thing whose size is of the order of a metre.I was talking about the size of the objects: an electron microscope is about: 1m x 100mm in diameter.An electron microscope hasn't got sufficient resolution to sense 100 fm.