0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You didn't even try to read this tread as you were focusing only on the negative aspects..
That paradox doesn't contradict Theory D. I have already explained it to you. Quote from: Dave Lev on 10/04/2020 14:39:49The assumption that an infinite Universe could keep the light during the night is a poor fiction.We actually get a direct light only from galaxies that are drifting away from us at a velocity which is less than a speed of light.Our scientists assume that due the speed of light, the maximal distance that we can still see a far away galaxy is about 13 Bly.If we will draw a direct line to any direction up to the infinity,
Well, if it was infinitely old then there would have been an infinite time for the light to get to us (not a mere 13Ga).So, along the line you talked about, there would be a visible star.
Quote from: Dave Lev on Today at 03:57:50"the "dark night sky paradox", is the argument that the darkness of the night sky conflicts with the assumption of an infinite and eternal static universe."So, it conflicts with a universe like the one you describe hereQuote from: Dave Lev on 18/03/2020 19:21:42 ... a clear indication that our Universe is Infinite in its size. Therefore, it also must be infinite in its age.
In the following article it is stated that the red shift is corresponding a comoving distance of more than 46 billion light-years.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedshiftThe cosmic microwave background has a redshift of z = 1089, corresponding to an age of approximately 379,000 years after the Big Bang and a comoving distance of more than 46 billion light-years."So, when we look at the CMB we do understand that they cross a distance of more than 46 BLY.Please be aware that the real meaning of comoving distance is the real distance:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comoving_and_proper_distances"Comoving distance factors out the expansion of the universe, giving a distance that does not change in time due to the expansion of space (though this may change due to other, local factors, such as the motion of a galaxy within a cluster)"So, Our scientists do not discuss on a proper distance due to the expansion:"Proper distance roughly corresponds to where a distant object would be at a specific moment of cosmological time, which can change over time due to the expansion of the universe. "They clearly claim that the Red Shift shows that the real distance (comoving distance) that the CMB radiation had crossed is more than 46 BLY.In order to cross that distance, you need at least 46 Billion year.
Either something is true or it isn't. The Big Bang theory, for example, can't be true for one person and false for another.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 10/04/2020 17:12:02Well, if it was infinitely old then there would have been an infinite time for the light to get to us (not a mere 13Ga).So, along the line you talked about, there would be a visible star.
Or we can do what you do and repeatedly make statements that have been shown to be false.That's called lying.
In real theory – there is no room for "unexpected" observation. Any new observation must perfectly fit the theory.
And so I see you still don't understand how universal expansion works...
So if I understand Theory D correctly, the proposal is that galaxies grow larger over time because the black hole in the center is continually creating matter and energy, right?
If this is true, then younger galaxies should be smaller than older galaxies.
So the further away galaxies are, the smaller they should look.
So, would you kindly explain what is the real meaning of "red shift that is corresponding a comoving distance of more than 46 billion light-years"?
However, the age of our universe is infinite.
46 billion light-years is the distance today. The distance was much smaller in the past.
However, the age of any single galaxy should be limited, shouldn't it?
galaxies should be smaller the younger they are.
SorryThis is totally incorrect.Everything in our Universe is relative (you can ask Einstein about it...)Let's assume that there is a galaxy at a distance of 130 BLY (galaxy A) that is drifting away from us at 10 times the speed of light.In order to understand what will happen with a light that is traveling today to our direction, let call it Light A.So, as any other light in the Universe, Light A had started today its movement to our direction at the speed of light.However, that speed of light is relevant to its point of source, which is galaxy A.Hence, as galaxy A is drifting away from us at 10 Times the speed of light, while Light A is moving in our direction at the speed of light, than the real outcome is that Light A is drifting away from us at 9 times the speed of light.Therefore, light A won't get to us never and ever.This simple explanation proves that your assumption is incorrect.In any case, I would never ever call it Lie. At the maximum I might say that your knowledge in science is very poorHowever, based on your definition:
Interesting, but it just shows that you failed to grasp my other point.If the universe is expanding, and it always has been, why is there anything still near us?I should be able to see no stars, or a star in every possible direction.
ExpansionBased on theory D, there is no need to set any space Expansion. We actually see the far end galaxies as they are moving away from us at almost the speed of light while there is no change in the space.So how it really works:Once upon a time a new Born BH had arrived to our Infinite Universe. It was the first spinning BH in the whole empty & dark space.Due to that spinning momentum, Magnetic field had been created. Therefore, some of its energy had been transformed by that magnetic field to create new particle pairs at the Photon Sphere. .One particle from those new created pair had been eaten by this first BH, while the opposite charged particle had been ejected outwards to the magnetic accelerator that we call now - accretion disc..This BH will increase its mass and energy over time. It will also be converted to the first Massive BH Hosting a dwarf galaxy. Later on it will be converted to a SMBH hosting a mighty spiral galaxy as the Milky Way.It will generate new atoms, molecular, Asteroids, Moons, Planets, Stars and even it own baby BHs.So, this first BH will become the mother the first matter in the Universe.As we all know - Mothers do not eat their children. Therefore, also this first BH has no intention or need to eat its Babies.Over time all the new created matter, stars BH's…will be ejected outwards from the galaxy.Our milky way acts as one of the biggest stars sprinkler in the Universe. Therefore we see more stars outside the galaxy than in the galaxy.Ejection Velocity (Ve) – The average velocity of the ejected Stars/BHs from the Galaxy.Each one of the second generation baby BHs will start to create new matter and over time it will be converted to MBH. At that time it might host a new dwarf galaxy while creating other new baby BHs. Maturity Time (Tm) - The time that it takes to a new born BH till it starts to generate its own baby BHs. I assume that by that time it will host a dwarf galaxy and it will drift away from its Mother galaxy at Ve velocity.Let's assume that all the new babies are drifting away at the same line direction.So, the second generation of BHs are drifting away from the first BH at Ve. The next generation will drift away from the first BH at 2Ve After n generation, the relative velocity between should be nVe.Based on my calculation:Let's assume that Ve is equal to the orbital velocity of our Sun around the Galaxy = 220 Km/s or 0.073% of the speed of light. Therefore, after 1370 generations, the last one will move at a speed which is almost the speed of light (relatively to the first galaxy).We can see it as a rocket over rocket over….rocket. 1370 times.It will take it = Te * 1370 generationsTherefore, as far as we look, we see that galaxies are drifting at a faster velocity from us.There is no limit for that velocity.After m * 1370 generations, the relative velocity will be M times the speed of light.As the Universe is infinite, at the far end there are galaxies that are drifting away from us at almost infinite speed.However, please be aware that new born BHs are ejected away in all directions. Therefore, in any nearby aria we see that the galaxies are moving in all directions.Therefore, there is no need to space expansion or dark energy to explain the ultra velocity of the far end galaxies.We only need to understand, that it is achievable after long enough time.There is a clear observation for the ejection process. We see that Triangulum (relatively small spiral galaxy – 40 Billion stars) is directly drifting away from it mother Andromeda (A supper massive spiral galaxy with about one Million Billion stars)As they are drifting away from each other, they set hydrogen "bridge" between them:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120611193632.htm"The new observations confirm a disputed 2004 discovery of hydrogen gas streaming between the giant Andromeda Galaxy, also known as M31, and the Triangulum Galaxy, or M33."This Hydrogen bridge is like an Umbilical cord which connects the mother galaxy – Andromeda' to her Embryo – Triangulum.
"Let's assume that there is a galaxy at a distance of 130 BLY (galaxy A) that is drifting away from us at 10 times the speed of light."Who put it there? It has been moving away from us for an infinite time (according to you). Why is it still there?
Our Universe isn't expanding!!!
Once upon a time a new Born BH had arrived to our Infinite Universe. It was the first spinning BH in the whole empty & dark space.Due to that spinning momentum, Magnetic field had been created. Therefore, some of its energy had been transformed by that magnetic field to create new particle pairs at the Photon Sphere. .
Our Universe isn't expanding!!!Only the matter/galaxies in our infinite Universe are expanding.
Let's assume that there is a galaxy at a distance of 130 BLY (galaxy A) that is drifting away from us at 10 times the speed of light.
OK, you said to let you know if I had problems reading that.Well, yes, because it's nonsense."a new Born BH"Born of what?"arrived to our Infinite Universe."From where?"was the first spinning BH in the whole empty & dark space."How come?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/04/2020 15:21:27OK, you said to let you know if I had problems reading that.Well, yes, because it's nonsense."a new Born BH"Born of what?"arrived to our Infinite Universe."From where?"was the first spinning BH in the whole empty & dark space."How come?Well, I advise you to read the explanation about theory D.After reading it, you should get the answers for all your questions.
After reading it, you should get the answers for all your questions.
Now, please answer my simple question.Why is the galaxy so close after it has been leaving us so fast, for so long?
You keep talking about things drifting away forever.WHY ARE THEY STILL HERE?
Do you think those galaxies are infinitely old?(which would be a breach of most of the observed laws of physics)?