0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
it is more logical that every possible part of the universe comes toward the particle.
To anything outside the particle and detector any mechanism of identifying this would follow the altered space time without any noticeable consequence (something like gravitational lensing would require macro scale disturbances of space time).
Alterations to space-time are detectable (i.e LIGO and VIRGO).
I posted years ago (without any reaction) that I believe it is more logical (given the various quantum paradoxes) that rather than a particle taking every possible path through the universe it is more logical that every possible part of the universe comes toward the particle.
It looks like you read something you didn't understand and then based on that proposed a process that doesn't make sense.
Quote from: Origin on 14/10/2021 16:06:58It looks like you read something you didn't understand and then based on that proposed a process that doesn't make sense.It's utterly counter intuitive but almost nothing at a quantum level makes sense. (I've read enough to understand nobody understands)Does a particle really take every possible route through the universe ? Does double slit wave / particle duality make sense ? Or entanglement ? Or tunneling ? Why would space time be malleable at a macro level and show no volatility at a micro level ?It's about 100 years of thinking in the same way with no progress :it's just a theory but at least it's coherent with what is observed.
At the level of a single particle double slit experiment ,,,, really ?
Quote from: alimac on 14/10/2021 16:30:10Quote from: Origin on 14/10/2021 16:06:58It looks like you read something you didn't understand and then based on that proposed a process that doesn't make sense.It's utterly counter intuitive but almost nothing at a quantum level makes sense. (I've read enough to understand nobody understands)Does a particle really take every possible route through the universe ? Does double slit wave / particle duality make sense ? Or entanglement ? Or tunneling ? Why would space time be malleable at a macro level and show no volatility at a micro level ?It's about 100 years of thinking in the same way with no progress :it's just a theory but at least it's coherent with what is observed. Quote from: BilboGrabbins on 14/10/2021 16:52:41Yes a particle will take all paths. We've been able to functionally prove this. The best experiment I can think of is Wheelers delayed choice.. As far as I can see it has never been claimed that this experiment proves particles take all paths. It relates to retrospective actions effecting superposition, interference and wave particle duality. (Experimental versions using two paths which are modified after the path has been initiated)
Yes a particle will take all paths. We've been able to functionally prove this. The best experiment I can think of is Wheelers delayed choice.
Quote from: alimac on 14/10/2021 06:17:23At the level of a single particle double slit experiment ,,,, really ?So how much movement are you talking about here?