The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Why do our brains sometimes 'reward' adverse responses?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why do our brains sometimes 'reward' adverse responses?

  • 2 Replies
  • 559 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lewis Thomson (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 213
  • Activity:
    5.5%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Why do our brains sometimes 'reward' adverse responses?
« on: 07/01/2022 11:12:36 »
Emily has been puzzled over this psychological question for a while,

"Why do humans build neurological pathways to reinforce behaviour that often initiates an adverse response after the first encounter? (e.g. when first time drug users experience a toxic response to the drug what builds continued use? The body recognizes the toxicity of the substance inducing an adverse response and why the brain seeks consumption thereafter?) The surface level response indicating dopamine activation seems contrary to an appropriate evolutionary response. Additionally the supposed purpose of plant toxicity is defensive, so why do animal brains build 'reward' from it?"

Can you help her in the comments below?...
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14206
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1078 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Why do our brains sometimes 'reward' adverse responses?
« Reply #1 on: 07/01/2022 17:23:50 »
Either the pleasure of intoxication exceeds the pain of the toxic response, or people persist because they can see someone else enjoying it when they have become habituated.
My guitar teacher told me on my second lesson that if it doesn't hurt at first, you aren't doing it right. Then he played a test piece and explained that, like ballet, it is worthwhile learning (painful) classical technique if you want to play jazz, but very difficult to do it the other way around. I've never been tempted by hard drugs or aerobatics, but I guess the same applies. 
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10235
  • Activity:
    38%
  • Thanked: 1227 times
    • View Profile
Re: Why do our brains sometimes 'reward' adverse responses?
« Reply #2 on: 08/01/2022 04:31:46 »
Quote from: OP
Why do humans build...
Maybe it is the plants that build chemicals (eg caffeine, opioids  and cannabinoids) which mimic animal neurotransmitters and bind to animal receptors to manipulate their behaviour?
- Caffeine has been shown to improve bee memories, so they can find their way back to other members of the same species of plant to fertilize the flowers.
- Some plants might benefit from plants eating and spreading their seeds, providing they don't crunch them up and digest them. So feeling pleasant about swallowing the seeds might encourage animals to swallow them. But the overdose from chewing them might encourage the animals to let them pass through undamaged...

Human agriculture means that we have a year-round supply of concentrated drug, when in nature it only occurs in dilute form for a limited season.

If people become accustomed to a regular supply of these imitation neurotransmitter, their nervous system adapts to them, and reduces production of the natural neurotransmitter. This means that addicts suffer withdrawal symptoms, and feel the need to go back for increasing doses of them.

Of course, with modern chemistry, we have ways to produce a whole range of chemicals that play with our nervous system in various novel ways. Some people just seek novelty...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humphry_Davy#Pneumatic_Institution
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: brain  / behaviour  / responses 
 

Similar topics (5)

QotW - 15.02.17 - QotW - 15.02.16 - Are smartphones changing our brains?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 15
Views: 12004
Last post 26/02/2015 07:21:01
by diethyl
BRAINS software of Aiko Demo Video Face, 3-D object

Started by Ai-botBoard Technology

Replies: 4
Views: 10900
Last post 12/12/2008 20:57:40
by josh-bot
Do the brains of the highly intelligent differ structurally from thicker people?

Started by colarrisBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 3
Views: 4819
Last post 06/04/2010 21:00:16
by Jessica H
How are aquatic species' brains adapted to the marine environment?

Started by Danielle Nelson Board Marine Science

Replies: 1
Views: 7315
Last post 26/02/2010 11:36:22
by LeeE
QotW - 20.08.03 - Do our brains process sound more slowly than light?

Started by EvaHBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 8
Views: 1801
Last post 18/08/2020 13:31:35
by EvaH
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.086 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.