0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
My theory is somewhat different to that though because my theory explains gravity.
An electron is not attracted to a proton...
the electron field is attracted to and merges with the proton field to create the N-field ,
a unified field that is a good contender for the mechanism of gravity.
I would rather talk to nobody than talk to people who's only intent is to be disruptive.
Quote from: Thebox on 25/09/2017 22:56:08An electron is not attracted to a proton... Yes it is.
This is the bit you are missing to complete quantum mechanics.. This is my last effort to explain gravity, my last science forum and quite simply I have had enough. f2.jpg (35.74 kB . 1015x625 - viewed 5953 times)
Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 14:29:28This is the bit you are missing to complete quantum mechanics.. This is my last effort to explain gravity, my last science forum and quite simply I have had enough. f2.jpg (35.74 kB . 1015x625 - viewed 5953 times)Of course it is, until your craving for attention gets too much and you post some more mumblings.
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/09/2017 16:20:40Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 14:29:28This is the bit you are missing to complete quantum mechanics.. This is my last effort to explain gravity, my last science forum and quite simply I have had enough. f2.jpg (35.74 kB . 1015x625 - viewed 5953 times)Of course it is, until your craving for attention gets too much and you post some more mumblings. Your answer is doing any sort of science is it? No answer is often the validation of the truth.Are you trying to say that my logic and use of simple physics is in some way flawed? Then please show my error I am all ear's.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 16:26:11Quote from: The Spoon on 27/09/2017 16:20:40Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 14:29:28This is the bit you are missing to complete quantum mechanics.. This is my last effort to explain gravity, my last science forum and quite simply I have had enough. f2.jpg (35.74 kB . 1015x625 - viewed 5953 times)Of course it is, until your craving for attention gets too much and you post some more mumblings. Your answer is doing any sort of science is it? No answer is often the validation of the truth.Are you trying to say that my logic and use of simple physics is in some way flawed? Then please show my error I am all ear's.Your error is making assertions without any kind of evidence other than 'this is the case because it is what I think'. If people point out you are wrong you claim that they are trolls or claim that your made up ideas are an 'axiom'. I do science all day as my job. What do you do? make videos about carp fishing with a synthesised voice?
No answer is often the validation of the truth.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 16:26:11No answer is often the validation of the truth.But most often it is folks not being bothered to challenge something which is obviously flawed.I haven't been following this thread so the comment is not about it in particular.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/09/2017 19:55:30Quote from: Thebox on 25/09/2017 22:56:08An electron is not attracted to a proton... Yes it is.I really suggest you go learn some Physics before you say things aren't making yourself look stupid. Mass is attracted to the C.O.M At C.O.M the N-field is at its most dense in accordance to the transverse square law. The N-field expands outwards , the N-field is an isolated system field. This field has attractive and repulsive properties. Basic physics my friend.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 14:23:37Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/09/2017 19:55:30Quote from: Thebox on 25/09/2017 22:56:08An electron is not attracted to a proton... Yes it is.I really suggest you go learn some Physics before you say things aren't making yourself look stupid. Mass is attracted to the C.O.M At C.O.M the N-field is at its most dense in accordance to the transverse square law. The N-field expands outwards , the N-field is an isolated system field. This field has attractive and repulsive properties. Basic physics my friend. Slightly more advanced physics.The electromagnetic force is about 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000 times bigger than the gravitational force and, in both cases they are attractive forces between the proton and electron.So, yes they are attracted to one another.The rest of what you posted is gibberish.
The rest of what you posted is gibberish.
I should hope so
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/09/2017 19:20:37The rest of what you posted is gibberish.Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 19:28:38I should hope soYou are just making stuff up.It's not science, it's not helpful; it's not even very creative.Why do you do it?
When one N-field exerts a force on a second N-field, the second N-field simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first N-field.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 19:46:41When one N-field exerts a force on a second N-field, the second N-field simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first N-field.You made that bit up, and it's gibberish.Show me any published work that supports the existence of these "N fields".
I made that bit up? It is almost word for word from Wiki apart from my edit.
Added - I think the magnet experiment proves the existence of Q.F.S Quantum field solidity.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 20:33:12Added - I think the magnet experiment proves the existence of Q.F.S Quantum field solidity.Everybody else thinks it proves Maxwell's equations.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/09/2017 23:16:39Quote from: Thebox on 27/09/2017 20:33:12Added - I think the magnet experiment proves the existence of Q.F.S Quantum field solidity.Everybody else thinks it proves Maxwell's equations.You think an equation can have purpose on its own? No the process is first , the maths explains the process , the maths does not explain Q.F.S