Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I never do mistakes, i learn.OK, both instances of the word "I" there should be a capital letter.
The proof that you don't understand it is your inability to explain what symmetry corresponds to your suggested "conservation of now".The point remains; you don't understand Noether's theorem.
Perhaps me, perhaps you.
Whats the proof of that ?
What insult ?This sort of thing.
Dont call mommy.
(calling mommy is not an example)But the interesting thing is that you don't seem to understand that you are insulting people.
Dont try to fool me with such primitiv recursif trick.So, you also don't know what recursive means.
I believe the usual meme here is "Tell me you don't understand Noether's theorem without saying you don't understand Noether's theorem".What symmetry are you putting forward as the counterpoint to your idea that ""now" is conserved?
I dont say anything like that.
I only say that if you dont agree that Noether theorem states that there is some "now" within the block universe, then you are stupid.
You can say : Oh no ! i dont believe ! Or whatever you can say.
This will not change the fact (and i am totaly sure some non stupid guys will understand that; soon they read it).
So, your preference would be to promote and prolong suffering.Do you really believe that vets enjoy euthanizing animals?
I dont believe, i only note that in France if we dont talk about dogs cats and horse (and even in that case they dont really care of the animal), every animal that is not actualy able to survive without help will be euthanized.
If a vet dont know how to help (because it would need some additional work) the animal to survive, he will euthanize it.
I'm aware of Noether's theorem.Please give an example of one of these illusions.
Please be more specific.
Starting with the assertion of your post, nobody will ever understand what you are talking about.What about it?
i can help you :Quotehttps://go.owu.edu/~physics/StudentResearch/2005/LauraBecker/SymmetrytoConservation.html
Noether's Theorem
*In 1915, the German mathematician Emmy Noether formulated her famous theorem. It states that every symmetry transformation of a system leads to the conservation of some quantity that is a property of the system
A symmetry transformation is any transformation that preserves the equation(s) of motion for the system.
This leads to the fact that there should be some conservation of some quantity that is a property of the system, so the now.
Why dont you agree that some "now" consideration could exists within all the points of views ?
Noether theorem.What about it?
Do you really believe that vets enjoy euthanizing animals?Where did you post that prediction?
I talked to some guy about.What basis do you have for your claim that they were "waiting for some pretext to euthanize him"?Because they are talking about this without even knowing if the animal need it.What is your expertise in this field?
I have some good psychological understanding of human behavior.
The vet has some "power" : She can euthanasize the animal.
She has some "weakness" : Incapacity to understand how to save the animal.
She prefer saying she acted (so she isnt prooving herself and others she is not incapacited) to save the well-being of the animal, and not saying she is not able to save his life (accordingly of her expertise).
Her expertise is very important to save her own ego.
She dident save the animal, but her ego is safe.
I am pretty sure that if she was at the place of the animal she would not have choose the euthanasia to save her well-being.
Is this New Logic Usefull?And now 4 months...
2 months on, nobody has suggested a use for it.
At least this is the result i predicted : They were waiting for some pretext to euthanize him.Where did you post that prediction?
I already have read wikipedia.Read it again.
How to cool things using light other than laser?The same way that you would do it using a laser, but using a different light source.
with the same heat capacityHeat capacity isn't well defined here.
It seems like you are trying so hard to look like you know more things than you actually do.I do know the stuff; I just know that there's not much point trying to explain it to you because you don't understand and or don't listen.
If that's not the case, then saying that the laser has negative 5000K is erroneous in the first place.or it means that your understanding is faulty.
There are many scientists. Sometimes they disagree with each others. You can choose one of them to follow,...
But they are unscientific reasons. We should choose a model based on its explanatory power, i. e. capable to explain more phenomena with less assumptions.OK, so what facts and observations are not explained by the current models in physics?
I'd love to get this right.We would also like you to get it right, but you can't even frame a sensible question.
I already explained that there's nothing magical about lasers.So, they don't have negative temperature.Do laser cutters decrease entropy?no.
I'd have to do lots of complicated maths but, for the sake of discussion, let's pretend that I have done it and the answer is minus 5000K.In a HeNe laser the electronic temperature is negative.What's the magnitude, in Kelvin?