The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?

  • 21 Replies
  • 18366 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
    • View Profile
How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« on: 09/08/2008 16:29:23 »
Centrifugal force.

If one took a hypothetical rope, half the diameter of the earth or radius, and swung it around at a 1000 miles per hour (the same speed the earth revolves around the celestial poles it must generate a force similar to gravity.


If the earth did not revolve, there would be no centrifugal force and it would seem logical that due to the absence of this action, our weight must differ minutely on the surfaces of revolving and non-revolving earths.

Could the Naked Scientist come up with an answer please?

Regards

Alan

Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28914
  • Activity:
    87%
  • Thanked: 1039 times
    • View Profile
How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #1 on: 09/08/2008 18:35:40 »
There is a difference, but it's small.
Imagine that you are at the north pole, the earth's spin is just turning you about a vertical axis, so there's no centrifugal force. You still weigh pretty much the same there as at the equator.
Actually this is complicated by the fact that, at the poles, you are slightly nearer to the centre of the earth so that also makes you weigh more.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
    • View Profile
How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #2 on: 09/08/2008 18:37:50 »
Quote
In combination, the equatorial bulge and the effects of centrifugal force mean that sea-level gravitational acceleration increases from about 9.780 m·s-2 at the equator to about 9.832 m·s-2 at the poles, so an object will weigh about 0.5% more at the poles than at the equator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_gravity

If the Earth stopped rotating I think the equatorial bulge would disappear and the Earth would become truly spherical,
 rather than an oblate-spheroid.
« Last Edit: 09/08/2008 18:49:45 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
    • View Profile
How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #3 on: 10/08/2008 06:34:49 »
Bored Chemist and others

Thank you for your answers which cleared it up for me nicely.

Quote
There is a difference, but it's small.
Imagine that you are at the north pole, the earth's spin is just turning you about a vertical axis, so there's no centrifugal force. You still weigh pretty much the same there as at the equator.
Actually this is complicated by the fact that, at the poles, you are slightly nearer to the centre of the earth so that also makes you weigh more.

Just a point about your above quote, in another thread I asked how our weight would differ in a deep hole. The concensus was that one would weigh less. But you say at the poles we weight minutely more. This goes counter to the other explanation. RD calculation was an 0.5 difference which is considerable

Regards

Alan
« Last Edit: 10/08/2008 19:42:36 by Alan McDougall »
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

lyner

  • Guest
How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #4 on: 10/08/2008 17:54:58 »
Quote
This goes counter to the other explanation
No, the explanation is fine.
When you are down in a hole, there is some mass 'above you' or, more precisely, you are inside a thin shell of the Earth which has no net contribution to your weight - so you weigh less.
On the North Pole, all the mass is 'beneath your feet' and you are nearer the Centre of Mass -  so you will weigh a bit more.
Logged
 



Offline Alan McDougall (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1285
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 16 times
    • View Profile
How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #5 on: 10/08/2008 19:44:19 »
Sophie,

Nice explanation I really understand it now, thanks

Alan
Logged
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)
 

Offline Europa

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 208
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #6 on: 21/07/2021 16:39:06 »
Quote from: RD on 09/08/2008 18:37:50
Quote
In combination, the equatorial bulge and the effects of centrifugal force mean that sea-level gravitational acceleration increases from about 9.780 m·s-2 at the equator to about 9.832 m·s-2 at the poles, so an object will weigh about 0.5% more at the poles than at the equator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_gravity

If the Earth stopped rotating I think the equatorial bulge would disappear and the Earth would become truly spherical,
 rather than an oblate-spheroid.

What force would create the sphere?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28914
  • Activity:
    87%
  • Thanked: 1039 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #7 on: 21/07/2021 17:37:32 »
Quote from: Europa on 21/07/2021 16:39:06
Quote from: RD on 09/08/2008 18:37:50
Quote
In combination, the equatorial bulge and the effects of centrifugal force mean that sea-level gravitational acceleration increases from about 9.780 m·s-2 at the equator to about 9.832 m·s-2 at the poles, so an object will weigh about 0.5% more at the poles than at the equator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_gravity

If the Earth stopped rotating I think the equatorial bulge would disappear and the Earth would become truly spherical,
 rather than an oblate-spheroid.

What force would create the sphere?
The same one that currently (almost) does; gravity.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline gem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 296
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #8 on: 22/07/2021 00:54:08 »
Hi all
So Alan
Quote from: Alan McDougall on 09/08/2008 16:29:23
Centrifugal force.

If one took a hypothetical rope, half the diameter of the earth or radius, and swung it around at a 1000 miles per hour (the same speed the earth revolves around the celestial poles it must generate a force similar to gravity.


If the earth did not revolve, there would be no centrifugal force and it would seem logical that due to the absence of this action, our weight must differ minutely on the surfaces of revolving and non-revolving earths.

Could the Naked Scientist come up with an answer please?

Regards

Alan



Yes your correct and its quite a straight forward calculation.

Acceleration (centripetal)  = Velocity squared /Radius  or  a(c) = V^2/R
plug in the numbers in SI units (metres and seconds )

Now the rotational velocity is obviously  greatest at the equator/middle, which when you do the calculation gives a value of

a(c) = 33.69 x 10 -3 ms^-2  or 33.69 mm^s-2 (read that as, metres per second squared or millimetres per second squared )

and given the value of earths gravitational acceleration is 9. 81 ms^-2 it is not an inconsiderate value, indeed the strength of the suns gravity field at earths distance is approximately

6.0 x10^-3 m s^-2     ( 6 millimetres per second squared.)
   
 ("its per second squared because its acceleration" due to the circular/centripetal motion is towards the center )

Where I am in the middle of England at an altitude of 250 m my velocity is reduced to 278.3 ms^-1 which gives;

a(c) = 20.24 mms^-2

so your weight difference at the equator (purely due to centripetal acceleration or no centripetal acceleration )
would be
Delta = 1Kg x 9.776 /1Kg x 9.810x 100% 
Delta = 0.99656.....%     or  0.3434 % less

So if you want to lose weight the easy way, move towards the equator  ;)

Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 16088
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1272 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #9 on: 22/07/2021 10:43:35 »
Pedantically, rotation might not affect your weight!

Weight can be defined the force exerted by gravitation on a body. This doesn't change, but rotation provides an opposing force.

Or you can define it as the total force exerted by gravitation and acceleration, which does change.

0.34% reduction in weight is important when reviewing athletic records for throwing or jumping!

« Last Edit: 22/07/2021 10:45:54 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline vhfpmr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 478
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #10 on: 22/07/2021 17:23:11 »
Quote from: gem on 22/07/2021 00:54:08
Hi all
So Alan
Quote from: Alan McDougall on 09/08/2008 16:29:23
Centrifugal force.

If one took a hypothetical rope, half the diameter of the earth or radius, and swung it around at a 1000 miles per hour (the same speed the earth revolves around the celestial poles it must generate a force similar to gravity.


If the earth did not revolve, there would be no centrifugal force and it would seem logical that due to the absence of this action, our weight must differ minutely on the surfaces of revolving and non-revolving earths.

Could the Naked Scientist come up with an answer please?

Regards

Alan



Yes your correct and its quite a straight forward calculation.

Acceleration (centripetal)  = Velocity squared /Radius  or  a(c) = V^2/R
plug in the numbers in SI units (metres and seconds )

Now the rotational velocity is obviously  greatest at the equator/middle, which when you do the calculation gives a value of

a(c) = 33.69 x 10 -3 ms^-2  or 33.69 mm^s-2 (read that as, metres per second squared or millimetres per second squared )

and given the value of earths gravitational acceleration is 9. 81 ms^-2 it is not an inconsiderate value, indeed the strength of the suns gravity field at earths distance is approximately

6.0 x10^-3 m s^-2     ( 6 millimetres per second squared.)
   
 ("its per second squared because its acceleration" due to the circular/centripetal motion is towards the center )

Where I am in the middle of England at an altitude of 250 m my velocity is reduced to 278.3 ms^-1 which gives;

a(c) = 20.24 mms^-2

so your weight difference at the equator (purely due to centripetal acceleration or no centripetal acceleration )
would be
Delta = 1Kg x 9.776 /1Kg x 9.810x 100% 
Delta = 0.99656.....%     or  0.3434 % less

So if you want to lose weight the easy way, move towards the equator  ;)


You've forgotten that centripetal acceleration acts perpendicular to the axis of rotation, not the earths surface, which means that a plumb line doesn't hang vertically, except at the poles and equator. At worst (at 45° latitude), it's about 0.1° off, or 4mm on a 2.4m wall.
Logged
 

Offline gem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 296
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #11 on: 24/07/2021 08:28:15 »
Hi all,

So vhfpmr
because the rotational motion affects both the surface of the Earth as well as
the bob, then the plumb Bob remains perpendicular to the Earth’s surface

4 mm out of plumb in 2.4 m on every wall built would have a good bricklayer wondering wtf  that’s an extra perp joint for every floor up
Logged
 

Offline vhfpmr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 478
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #12 on: 26/07/2021 00:06:48 »
Quote from: gem on 24/07/2021 08:28:15
Hi all,

So vhfpmr
because the rotational motion affects both the surface of the Earth as well as
the bob, then the plumb Bob remains perpendicular to the Earth’s surface

4 mm out of plumb in 2.4 m on every wall built would have a good bricklayer wondering wtf  that’s an extra perp joint for every floor up

Er, no it doesn't. Gravity (G, in black) acts perpendicular to the earths surface, centripetal acceleration (C in green) acts perpendicular to the axis of rotation. The centripetal acceleration can then be resolved into two orthogonal components (red), one Cv acting vertically which makes no difference to the angle of the plumb line, and the other, Ch, acting horizontally, which swings the plumb line away from the vertical. The plumb line only hangs vertically at the equator, where the horizontal component is zero, and at the poles where the centripetal acceleration is zero.

* Globe.png (10.78 kB . 777x724 - viewed 4645 times)
Logged
 



Offline gem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 296
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #13 on: 26/07/2021 08:13:03 »
Hi all,

So vhfpmr I was quoting directly from

https://www.sfu.ca/~boal/211lecs/211lec12.pdf

Bottom of page 2

Quote:

(Lastly, because the rotational motion affects both the surface of the Earth as well as
the bob, then S remains perpendicular to the Earth’s surface)

What I believe this means is if you did the plumb Bob test over say an area of water 💧 on earth’s surface the plumb line would be vertical/perpendicular at every latitude.

So 🧱bricklayers rest easy, you cannot blame the latitude and north/south elevation of the wall

 one on top of two 
Logged
 

Offline vhfpmr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 478
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #14 on: 26/07/2021 12:37:38 »
Quote from: gem on 26/07/2021 08:13:03
I was quoting directly from

https://www.sfu.ca/~boal/211lecs/211lec12.pdf
Hmm, OK.

I follow the maths which concludes with
"ε ~ 0.0017 x 57.3 = 0.1 of a degree"
which is the figure I got. But then having arrived at that, they throw in
"because the rotational motion affects both the surface of the Earth as well as the bob, then S remains perpendicular to the Earth’s surface"
without further explanation, which is the bit I don't follow.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: gem

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28914
  • Activity:
    87%
  • Thanked: 1039 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #15 on: 26/07/2021 12:45:36 »
Quote from: vhfpmr on 26/07/2021 00:06:48
The plumb line only hangs vertically at the equator,
For a particular definition of vertical. (essentially: "points to the middle of the Earth").
But if your definition is "perpendicular to the surface of the Earth" then the plumb line is always vertical.
This definition also means that things fall vertically and you can build a vertical tower of bricks without needing cement.

Quote from: vhfpmr on 26/07/2021 00:06:48
Er, no it doesn't. Gravity (G, in black) acts perpendicular to the earths surface
You have assumed a spherical Earth- often a reasonable start, but not in this thread about the Earth not being a sphere.
« Last Edit: 26/07/2021 12:50:27 by Bored chemist »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: gem

Offline vhfpmr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 478
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #16 on: 26/07/2021 13:14:43 »
Here's a spindle with a radius arm attached. Hanging by a piece of string from the radius arm is a weight, which is pulled toward the centre of the spindle by a force provided by a piece of elastic. If I take it up to the space station where there's little/no gravity, the string and elastic will be colinear whist the spindle is stationary, but when the spindle rotates, centrifugal force will move the weight away from the spindle like the bobs on a steam engine regulator, no? What changes if I replace the elastic with gravity?

* Globe 2.png (3.8 kB . 594x689 - viewed 4722 times)
« Last Edit: 26/07/2021 13:28:33 by vhfpmr »
Logged
 



Offline vhfpmr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 478
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #17 on: 26/07/2021 13:20:45 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/07/2021 12:45:36
Quote from: vhfpmr on 26/07/2021 00:06:48
The plumb line only hangs vertically at the equator,
For a particular definition of vertical. (essentially: "points to the middle of the Earth").
But if your definition is "perpendicular to the surface of the Earth" then the plumb line is always vertical.
This definition also means that things fall vertically and you can build a vertical tower of bricks without needing cement.

Quote from: vhfpmr on 26/07/2021 00:06:48
Er, no it doesn't. Gravity (G, in black) acts perpendicular to the earths surface
You have assumed a spherical Earth- often a reasonable start, but not in this thread about the Earth not being a sphere.
I've assumed a spherical earth because I'm arguing about the effect of rotation on a plumb line, not variations in gravity or the effect of rotation on the shape of the earth. If the earth is spherical, 'points at the centre' is the same as 'perpendicular to the surface'.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28914
  • Activity:
    87%
  • Thanked: 1039 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #18 on: 26/07/2021 13:24:20 »

* Zog.png (4.47 kB . 592x416 - viewed 4426 times)Here is a picture of a section through the planet Zog- it's very clearly elliptical.
If you look you will see that a line perpendicular to the surface does not go through the centre of Zog.

The reason Zog is that shape is because it's spinning fast.
The effect of the combination of gravity and spin ensures that the pendulum always hangs perpendicular to the surface of Zog, but it does not go through the centre unless you are at the equator or a pole.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28914
  • Activity:
    87%
  • Thanked: 1039 times
    • View Profile
Re: How would our weight differ on a revolving to that of a non-revolving earth.?
« Reply #19 on: 26/07/2021 13:25:10 »
Quote from: vhfpmr on 26/07/2021 13:20:45
the effect of rotation on a plumb line, not variations in gravity or the effect of rotation on the shape of the earth.
The shape of the earth is the same thing as the effect of rotation.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

What causes the Earth to have "seasons"?

Started by RobotGymnastBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 11
Views: 15386
Last post 28/07/2021 14:58:50
by TommyJ
Can matter and anti-matter annhilation one day power the earth?

Started by spook1456Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 10312
Last post 11/04/2011 17:46:33
by JMLCarter
Is the Earth immersed in dark energy and dark matter?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 9534
Last post 13/08/2012 13:18:25
by lightarrow
Would increase or a drop in Sun's temperature effect Earth's temperature?

Started by bobdihiBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 9098
Last post 29/07/2019 10:55:01
by andrew7278
Are stars nearer to Earth moving slower than stars further away?

Started by Lewis ThomsonBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 4
Views: 725
Last post 08/09/2022 11:07:44
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.187 seconds with 83 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.