0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The twins contradiction merely kills the Einsteinian SR.
Yes but the Einsteinian SR or STR is the only SR or STR out there.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 01/02/2019 06:21:10Yes but the Einsteinian SR or STR is the only SR or STR out there. No, the contemporary Einstein relativity that proposed the twin paradox, is not the original Einstein's relativity. It was not the fault of Einstein those mafia did not award the prize to the rightful originators.And as a matter of fact, if Einstein had not intervened, the Bose-Einstein condensate would have been plagiarized, if not buried. Science has been politicised and underseiged since its inception.
But Einstein was heavily involved in the twins contradiction, he even proposed the silliest excuses.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 01/02/2019 10:24:37But Einstein was heavily involved in the twins contradiction, he even proposed the silliest excuses.Einstein debunked the twins paradox with geodesic motion, which the postulated inertia accelerated, is the equivalent principle of GR.
I recall that Einstein's excuse involved the concept that a clock had a memory of its history of acceleration.
I have a explanation why people are so keen to dismiss GR and SR , while on an engineering at Siemens Hell in Kiel I quoted Einstein to the "ex" Nazi instructor his reply "but he was a Jew"l
owadays big money hurts science, especially in theusofa.And politics, especially in theusofa.And Christians, especially in theusofa.
And this cult will lose face when the truth comes out (that SR & GR are fake, & aether exists)(that the BB is krapp)(that GWs are krapp)(the accelerating expanding universe is krapp)(etc etc etc).
Prof Reg Cahill actually mentioned Earth climate is cooling, and IMO he was correct.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 31/01/2019 09:37:15And this cult will lose face when the truth comes out (that SR & GR are fake, & aether exists)(that the BB is krapp)(that GWs are krapp)(the accelerating expanding universe is krapp)(etc etc etc).You mentioned Prof Reg Cahill and his link to GW with assertions in another thread, so for a while I thought you agreed with the global warming science. Am glad you know that the GW science is crap, for it has absolutely flopped for its application of the contemporary scientific method, which is another crap when it comes to actuality. Reality check by nature on the GW propositions, is underway. Or have I mistaken your GW mentioned here, actually refers to gravitational wave? Just read Prof Reg Cahill actually mentioned Earth climate is cooling, and IMO he was correct.
And the lieing by Einsteinologists & their LIGO krapp
Quote from: syhprum on 02/02/2019 07:53:17I have a explanation why people are so keen to dismiss GR and SR , while on an engineering at Siemens Hell in Kiel I quoted Einstein to the "ex" Nazi instructor his reply "but he was a Jew"l Awkward...But it does raise an interesting point.There was a conference where a bunch of nazi scientists (I use the term loosely) under the direction of their government all pointed out "problems" with Einstein's theories. He was asked what he thought about such a powerful and prestigious group attacking his ideas. His response was that, if they were actually correct, then a single undergraduate student pointing it out would be all that was needed.So, we had a situation where the political forces went the other way- the nazi government was determined to undermine Einstein and his ideas. Great blessings of a powerful elite would rain down on anyone who could do it.And yet, the Germans continued to try to build an atom bomb that could only work if he was correct. So the idea that Einstein's theories are only supported by a political conspiracy is nonsense. We know that when a political conspiracy tried to oppose them, it failed.
All that stuff about "Quote from: mad aetherist on 30/01/2019 23:49:40Nowadays big money hurts science, especially in theusofa.And politics, especially in theusofa.And Christians, especially in theusofa.is nonsense.
Nowadays big money hurts science, especially in theusofa.And politics, especially in theusofa.And Christians, especially in theusofa.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 02/02/2019 20:22:30And the lieing by Einsteinologists & their LIGO krappStill going on about that LIGO conspiracy, eh?
I think that there must be a conspiracy surrounding LIGO & Co, ie not just inside LIGO.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 02/02/2019 21:19:26I think that there must be a conspiracy surrounding LIGO & Co, ie not just inside LIGO. What evidence do you have for such a conspiracy?
The evidence of a conspiracy inside LIGO is in the results, ie they have some. The evidence of a conspiracy reaching outside LIGO is in the agreement of results. I think that this shows collusion.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 03/02/2019 00:49:46The evidence of a conspiracy inside LIGO is in the results, ie they have some. The evidence of a conspiracy reaching outside LIGO is in the agreement of results. I think that this shows collusion.You're going to have to explain how this is evidence of a conspiracy. I don't see how that follows.And please, please don't respond with something ridiculous along the lines of, "since relativity is wrong, any positive results that LIGO, VIRGO or other gravitational wave detectors obtained must have been put there by a conspiracy," because that would be one of the worst cases of the "begging the question" fallacy I have ever seen: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/53/Begging-the-Question
Yes but if the winner of a cockfight quacks & lays an egg, & if u found out that LIGO bet $1 billion on the winner, then i call that evidence.
Quote from: mad aetherist on 03/02/2019 01:39:15Yes but if the winner of a cockfight quacks & lays an egg, & if u found out that LIGO bet $1 billion on the winner, then i call that evidence.I don't know what a cockfight has to do with anything. Can you rephrase that in plain English?