0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/03/2018 22:39:37Quote from: Thebox on 26/03/2018 21:05:01 know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,Non sequitur.They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.They are attracted to each other because of something? Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance. So come back when you have learnt some science,
Quote from: Thebox on 26/03/2018 21:05:01 know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,Non sequitur.They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.
know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/03/2018 22:39:37Quote from: Thebox on 26/03/2018 21:05:01 know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,Non sequitur.They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.They are attracted to each other because of something? Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance. So come back when you have learnt some science, You do speak a lot of crap dont you? You really don't know the difference between force and mass? Mass as has been pointed out before is a measure of the amount of material in a body. Force is a measure of interaction between bodies. This is why the force applied by a 1kg weight falling will vary with height it is falling from. See here:http://www.npl.co.uk/reference/faqs/what-are-the-differences-between-mass,-weight,-force-and-load-(faq-mass-and-density)I suspect you are now just trolling with your post above, going on about your 'brilliance'. Does this include mocking people with brain tumours?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/03/2018 22:40:11Quote from: Thebox on 26/03/2018 22:06:02Logical argument If A→←B and B→←A then A→←A,B and B→←A,B then must A,B→←A,BNope, word salad.Quite obvious you have never done an I.Q test, ...
Quote from: Thebox on 26/03/2018 22:06:02Logical argument If A→←B and B→←A then A→←A,B and B→←A,B then must A,B→←A,BNope, word salad.
Logical argument If A→←B and B→←A then A→←A,B and B→←A,B then must A,B→←A,B
kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. Actually, he's right.Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.They really are different.I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons I weigh on Earth
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/03/2018 19:22:27Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. Actually, he's right.Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.They really are different.I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons I weigh on EarthLmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth. The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material. Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR Moon
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:31:32Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/03/2018 19:22:27Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. Actually, he's right.Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.They really are different.I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons I weigh on EarthLmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth. The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material. Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR MoonSo, you have demonstrated that you also don't know what the difference between mass and weight is you utter donkey.
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 19:36:33Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:31:32Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/03/2018 19:22:27Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. Actually, he's right.Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.They really are different.I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons I weigh on EarthLmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth. The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material. Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR MoonSo, you have demonstrated that you also don't know what the difference between mass and weight is you utter donkey. NO, I know what the difference is according to ''you'' , but guess what? you are still wrong and making things up .
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:39:30Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 19:36:33Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:31:32Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/03/2018 19:22:27Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. Actually, he's right.Kg is a unit of mass and Newton is a unit of force.They really are different.I'm still 70Kg on the Moon but my weight is about a sixth of the 700 or so Newtons I weigh on EarthLmao , 70 kg on the moon is not 70 kg on the earth. The material has less weight of gravity acting on it, there is less force pulling down the scales , therefore there will be less mass measured on the moon, because volume is a measure of material. Mass is an equivalent to Newtons, and I am right not MR MoonSo, you have demonstrated that you also don't know what the difference between mass and weight is you utter donkey. NO, I know what the difference is according to ''you'' , but guess what? you are still wrong and making things up .Oh do grow up. The internationally accepted definition doesnt fit you ridiculous world view so you claim it is wrong? Who are you? Humpty dumpty?
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 13:14:31Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/03/2018 22:39:37Quote from: Thebox on 26/03/2018 21:05:01 know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,Non sequitur.They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.They are attracted to each other because of something? Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance. So come back when you have learnt some science, You do speak a lot of crap dont you? You really don't know the difference between force and mass? Mass as has been pointed out before is a measure of the amount of material in a body. Force is a measure of interaction between bodies. This is why the force applied by a 1kg weight falling will vary with height it is falling from. See here:http://www.npl.co.uk/reference/faqs/what-are-the-differences-between-mass,-weight,-force-and-load-(faq-mass-and-density)I suspect you are now just trolling with your post above, going on about your 'brilliance'. Does this include mocking people with brain tumours?Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science. You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is.
Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science. You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:19:00Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 13:14:31Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 08:43:10Quote from: Bored chemist on 26/03/2018 22:39:37Quote from: Thebox on 26/03/2018 21:05:01 know Neutral things are attracted to neutral things because they are uncharged,Non sequitur.They are attracted to eachother because they have mass.They are attracted to each other because of something? Mass is the equivalent of something , mass itself is meaningless, kg is the result of force, kg is just replacing Newtons but means the exact same thing as Newtons. If you say any other than this , you are a bare face liar, and I will tell anyone who thinks with such stupidity the same thing. From now on I am not going to take any crap from the likes of you, you have poor thinking skills and are not worthy of my brilliance. So come back when you have learnt some science, You do speak a lot of crap dont you? You really don't know the difference between force and mass? Mass as has been pointed out before is a measure of the amount of material in a body. Force is a measure of interaction between bodies. This is why the force applied by a 1kg weight falling will vary with height it is falling from. See here:http://www.npl.co.uk/reference/faqs/what-are-the-differences-between-mass,-weight,-force-and-load-(faq-mass-and-density)I suspect you are now just trolling with your post above, going on about your 'brilliance'. Does this include mocking people with brain tumours?Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science. You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is. Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:19:00Quite obviously your subjective argument is frivolous litigation, repeating Wiki does not change the very fact, how stupid history was to create so many mistakes about science. You can keep repeating these mistakes all day because you preach this rubbish literally and your religion is fixed by your education and I am finding it rather amusing how stupid most of the world is. My arugument is frivilous litigation? What is that? A term you have picked up on a legal forum that you think sounds impressive so you thought you would missapply it? Do you think it makes you sound like a gentleman scientist? It doesn't it just displays your very evident ignorance. The link I gave you wasn't Wiki either, it is from the National Physical Laboratory. Ironic as the only source of information you ever quote is is wikipedia. Good job that definition is right too as it my make my job difficult if not... Still, I suppose that wouldnt affect you would it? I still think you are despicable for mocking people with brain tumours by the way.
No force no mass simple.
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00 No force no mass simple.Simple; but wrong.There's an entire wiki page dedicated to explaining it to people who don't understand the difference.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_versus_weightTry learning- it can make you feel good.
A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/03/2018 20:03:11Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00 No force no mass simple.Simple; but wrong.There's an entire wiki page dedicated to explaining it to people who don't understand the difference.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_versus_weightTry learning- it can make you feel good.I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation, it does not matter how many times you repeat and try to insult my intelligence, the fact you are wrong will not change. Now if you want to agree it is the same but used for different things, then I am happy to accept that.
Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales,
Quote from: Thebox on 27/03/2018 19:56:00A brain Tuna is not a brain tumour is it now, the only mocking there is your own subjective interpretation and change of words. Frivolous litigation is when I know the defences , defence, I know everything you can say on mass, I also know this is wrong and show why it is wrong, like most of the frivolous litigation incorrect science you teach. Mass is a result in kg on a set of scales, What makes this result? quite clearly the force between two objects. No force no mass simple.Making posts pretending to type in a way that somebody with a mental impairment caused by a tumour is mocking them, in the same way as Trump mocked the disabled. In law frivolous litigation is the practice of starting or carrying on lawsuits that, due to their lack of legal merit, have little to no chance of being won. This is a science forum in case you didnt notice not a court of law. Mass is shown on a set of scales. Nobody else in the world accepts your definition. It is rather like claiming a potato is the sky.
'I do not need to learn anything, I already know your frivolous litigation'You have demonstrated constantly that you do. Look, he has found a new phrase.