The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
The greatest common denominator of the elementary particles is their charge
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Go Down
The greatest common denominator of the elementary particles is their charge
41 Replies
18857 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Soyabrock
Jr. Member
13
Activity:
0%
Re: The greatest common denominator of the elementary particles is their charge
«
Reply #40 on:
03/08/2014 21:03:15 »
You do not tell as anything about spin of elementary particles. Why?
«
Last Edit: 03/08/2014 21:35:33 by Soyabrock
»
Logged
valonispetr
(OP)
Jr. Member
37
Activity:
0%
Re: The greatest common denominator of the elementary particles is their charge
«
Reply #41 on:
05/08/2014 22:03:23 »
Since the spin is not a physical category, ie has no material content. Only mathematic. Although spin of particles do not presents the mechanical rotation he has said this "movement" axis of rotation. This goes not with a real physics together. What does not rotate as have not even rotational axis! Physicists seems doun’t mind. This is my answer to your question.
Socrates model not to say that the phenomenon of spin of elementary particles, no exists, but that she had to drafting
their model a spin needn't!
This is a substantial difference! Let me give a simple example: the decay of a neutron. The standard model (SM) interprets this as follows: Since the neutron has halfspin as well as proton and electron, it must be "born" at the same time a third particle with halfspin . As said 1/2 = +1 / 2 + 1/2 + (- 1/2). This is true,
but the particles aren!t a rotating Wolf Cubs
with oriented spin like a gyroscope! Academic physics says that
the spin of elementary particles is not their mechanical spin!
Socrates says this model: when neutron is anomal crossing kvarton may cause disruption of the internal configuration of protoels inside this kvarton, be situations when there isn't emission like new vakant of neutron , but only vakant of proton. Instead of a normal, balanced kvarton, there left the lifeless body (np'nn'). The entire decay of the neutron can be recorded as follows: (n) + (pp'nn ') → (p) + (np'nn'). Folder (np'nn') is incomplete, unbalanced and therefore "lifeless" body, which therefore quickly fall apart in two stable duons (np) + (nn'). These two units (duons) are known in the Socratic model, like the electron and neutrino. Similarly, we can illustrate other "desays".
You may wish to form a mathematical interpretation of the symbols spin and its orientation, and various positive or negative leptons numbers or baryons number of actors, that have no physical basis, or a Socrates material form, based on the current configuration of the material protoparticles. Both interpretations lead to the same result. However, interpretation of Socrates material has a physical basis. It is up to you to judge which model is more physics! What is certain is that the interpretation of the decay of the neutron (and these other decays)
Socrates does not need the idea of spin!
In more detail on: Wonderful Socrates' Kvarton Model of World. (
https://petrvalonis.blogspot.com
[nofollow]
)
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...