Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences => Cells, Microbes & Viruses => Topic started by: HealthTeacher on 29/08/2016 15:49:26
-
Finally I think I have found a place that can answer
this question(s) for me!!! Obviously HIV is a very fragile virus that doesn't
take much to inactivate!! My question is about disinfectant vs. natural
environmental "killing" of the virus. What more to the virus would using a
disinfect do to "kill" the virus, that environmental exposure wouldn't do
itself.....lets say after a week of being out of the body? Basically if a
person is OCD about the HIV virus, is it even worth covering everything (door
knobs, shopping carts, etc) with disinfectant in trying to destroy the virus
MORE than it already is? What would it look like under a microscope after a
disinfectant vs. a week in the environment!
Thanks for your time!!!!
Middle School Health Teacher
-
What more to the virus would using a disinfect do to "kill" the virus, that environmental exposure wouldn't do itself.....lets say after a week of being out of the body?
Basically if a person is OCD about the HIV virus, is it even worth covering everything (door
knobs, shopping carts, etc) with disinfectant in trying to destroy the virus
MORE than it already is?
A disinfectant would merely kill HIV in a shorter timeframe.
Now in the context of the proposed scenario, it wouldn't matter either way, as HIV wouldn't survive on a door knob or similar surface for more than a few hours [at best]
-
Thanks for the reply..........So in other words, using a disinfect wouldn't do anymore to KILL hiv than the environment would do, it would just speed up the process. Basically the disinfectant after a week is a waste of disinfectant??
-
Thanks for the reply..........So in other words, using a disinfect wouldn't do anymore to KILL hiv than the environment would do, it would just speed up the process. Basically the disinfectant after a week is a waste of disinfectant??
Precisely.
HIV on a door knob couldn't survive in an oxidative environment for more than a few hours, so using a disinfectant after that few-hour timeframe would serve little purpose
-
Thanks again!
Do you have access to any pictures of what a dead (HIV)virus exposed to the environment compared to a dead virus from disinfectant would look like. Would they look the same?? As you can tell, I didn't take many courses in microbiology. I can not convince a student that they are wasting their time using lysol on doors, shopping carts, etc. when dealing with HIV. She thinks it will KILL it more!
-
Do you have access to any pictures of what a dead (HIV)virus exposed to the environment compared to a dead virus from disinfectant would look like. Would they look the same?? As you can tell, I didn't take many courses in microbiology. I can not convince a student that they are wasting their time using lysol on doors, shopping carts, etc. when dealing with HIV. She thinks it will KILL it more!
Unfortunately I do not know of any such comparison. What your student needs to realize is that HIV is an extremely fragile virus outside of the host. Once it's inactivated via environmental and/or external degradation.... there is no reactivating. Period.
-
Thanks again!
Do you have access to any pictures of what a dead (HIV)virus exposed to the environment compared to a dead virus from disinfectant would look like. Would they look the same?? As you can tell, I didn't take many courses in microbiology. I can not convince a student that they are wasting their time using lysol on doors, shopping carts, etc. when dealing with HIV. She thinks it will KILL it more!
I doubt anyone has a picture of a live virus.
Almost all virions are far to small to see, even with a light microscope. You need an electron microscope to see them.
But, in order to see something with an electron microscope, you need to expose it to a high vacuum- and it's quite common practice to plate it with a (very) thin layer of gold.
The virus wouldn't be viable after that.
-
Thanks again for the responses. Great site!!
So what "kills" it? When it looses its protein coat? Basically disinfectant and the environment do the same thing to the virus..... disinfectant just does it faster?
-
"kills" is a tricky concept in the world of the virus. A virus isn't alive.
However like a lot of living things it works because it has a particular arrangement of component parts. Disrupting either those parts or the arrangement will inactivate the virus.
Bleach- as an example will destroy proteins.
Ultraviolet light will destroy the DNA or RNA of the virus.
Exposure to air will have a number of effects.
One is that it will dry out- most viruses will need some water to hold their structures together .
It also allows the virus to be exposed to UV light.
And it also exposes the virus to free radicals- shattered bits of molecules that exist - typically in small concentrations- in the air.
Those radicals are very reactive and- much like hydrogen peroxide- they randomly react with bits of the virus and tear bits out of it.
In the long run, it doesn't matter. The virus gets torn to bits or too mangled to "work".
-
So what "kills" it? When it looses its protein coat? Basically disinfectant and the environment do the same thing to the virus..... disinfectant just does it faster?
Well detergent-mediated inactivation generally causes dissolution of the lipid membrane, splicing of the nucleic acids and permanent cross-linking of viral proteins. Environmental inactivation is primarily oxidative and sunlight-mediated.
-
HIV is an internal problem caused by bad diet, alcohol, drugs, lack of vitamins, sleep deprivation etc. Using external cleaning agents will be ineffective. Note - There are no viruses involved in HIV.
-
There are no viruses involved in HIV.
rofl.... nice try. This is a [science] forum.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1a/HIV-budding-Color.jpg/1280px-HIV-budding-Color.jpg)
HIV is an internal problem caused by bad diet, alcohol, drugs, lack of vitamins, sleep deprivation ect.
Do you believe in unicorns by chance?
~
-
There are no viruses involved in HIV.
rofl.... nice try. This is a [science] forum.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1a/HIV-budding-Color.jpg/1280px-HIV-budding-Color.jpg)
HIV is an internal problem caused by bad diet, alcohol, drugs, lack of vitamins, sleep deprivation ect.
Do you believe in unicorns by chance?
~
Yeah, this is a science forum. So why are you posting such nonsense? Viruses don't have cell walls and are single celled. This picture is obviously not a virus. Note - - Electron microscopes can only see black and white, so where did all that colour come from? lol! Nice try though!
-
Yeah, this is a science forum. So why are you posting such nonsense? Viruses don't have cell walls and are single celled.
"Enveloped viruses acquire lipid membranes as their outer coat through interactions with cellular membranes during morphogenesis within, and egress from, infected cells. In contrast, non-enveloped viruses typically exit cells by cell lysis, and lipid membranes are not part of the released virions. However, non-enveloped viruses also interact with lipid membranes at least during entry into target cells. Therefore, lipids, as part of cellular membranes, inevitably play some roles in life cycle of viruses."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3187601/
-
This picture is obviously not a virus. Note - - Electron microscopes can only see black and white, so where did all that colour come from? lol! Nice try though!
Color enhanced Transmission Electron Micrograph..... I guess you didn't get the memo.
So how about them unicorns?
-
Yeah, this is a science forum. So why are you posting such nonsense? Viruses don't have cell walls and are single celled.
"Enveloped viruses acquire lipid membranes as their outer coat through interactions with cellular membranes during morphogenesis within, and egress from, infected cells. In contrast, non-enveloped viruses typically exit cells by cell lysis, and lipid membranes are not part of the released virions. However, non-enveloped viruses also interact with lipid membranes at least during entry into target cells. Therefore, lipids, as part of cellular membranes, inevitably play some roles in life cycle of viruses."
Trying to bluff me into submission with long complicated scientific jargon doesn't cut it with me! lol
-
This picture is obviously not a virus. Note - - Electron microscopes can only see black and white, so where did all that colour come from? lol! Nice try though!
Color enhanced Transmission Electron Micrograph..... I guess you didn't get the memo.
So how about them unicorns?
It has been known in the past, that some stupid people have mistaken hormones for viruses! I hope that you wouldn't put yourself in that category? lol!
-
Trying to bluff me into submission with long complicated scientific jargon doesn't cut it with me! lol
That's called peer-reviewed scientific evidence, and it annihilates your foolish comments.
-
It has been known in the past, that some stupid people have mistaken hormones for viruses! I hope that you wouldn't put yourself in that category? lol!
Oh Ye, Of Little Knowledge.....
(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn-http.innerbody.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2FHIV%2520virions.png&hash=2eafcffbe132a621a0a586e28c9a094b)
http://cdn-http.innerbody.com/sites/default/files/HIV%20virions.png
-
HIV is an enveloped virus. This means that the core of the virus, which contains the genetic information, is wrapped up in an oily layer. Sticking out of this oily envelope are the "receptor" molecules that are used by the virus particle to attach to - and infect - target cells.
The envelope is stable only in an aqueous (watery) environment. This means that while it is in blood the virus remains viable. But transferred to an external surface, which will dry out, the virus will also dry and the envelope will be disrupted. When this happens the receptors upon which it depends for infectivity will also be disrupted and hence the virus is incapable of infecting.
At the same time, in the environment the virus is exposed to ultraviolet rays which chemically destroy the nucleic acid (RNA) that comprises the viral genomes (each particle has 2 copies of its genome). This mutates the virus out of existence, further reducing viability.
In terms of cleaning products that are effective, enveloped viruses, as a rule, are fairly fragile and relative easy to clean up. Anything that disrupts an oily structure will disable them. So soap and water, washing up liquid or an alcohol solution will "sterilise" enveloped viruses from a surface.
-
Yup.....I am just trying to find out if using a disinfectant is a waste of cleaner and time after a period of time....like a day or so? Does it do anymore to the environmentally already inactive virus. OCD situation.
-
Yup.....I am just trying to find out if using a disinfectant is a waste of cleaner and time after a period of time....like a day or so? Does it do anymore to the environmentally already inactive virus.
Your student is just wasting disinfectant....
"using a disinfectant after that few-hour timeframe would serve little purpose"
"Once it's inactivated via environmental and/or external degradation.... there is no reactivating. Period."
-
HIV is an enveloped virus. This means that the core of the virus, which contains the genetic information, is wrapped up in an oily layer. Sticking out of this oily envelope are the "receptor" molecules that are used by the virus particle to attach to - and infect - target cells.
What is the oil made of?
The envelope is stable only in an aqueous (watery) environment. This means that while it is in blood the virus remains viable. But transferred to an external surface, which will dry out, the virus will also dry and the envelope will be disrupted. When this happens the receptors upon which it depends for infectivity will also be disrupted and hence the virus is incapable of infecting.
How does an oily virus gain access to an aqueous environment when oil and water don't mix?
At the same time, in the environment the virus is exposed to ultraviolet rays which chemically destroy the nucleic acid (RNA) that comprises the viral genomes (each particle has 2 copies of its genome). This mutates the virus out of existence, further reducing viability.
How can a virus which is dead by ultraviolet light can infect other people at the same time?
-
HIV is an enveloped virus. This means that the core of the virus, which contains the genetic information, is wrapped up in an oily layer. Sticking out of this oily envelope are the "receptor" molecules that are used by the virus particle to attach to - and infect - target cells.
What is the oil made of?
The envelope is stable only in an aqueous (watery) environment. This means that while it is in blood the virus remains viable. But transferred to an external surface, which will dry out, the virus will also dry and the envelope will be disrupted. When this happens the receptors upon which it depends for infectivity will also be disrupted and hence the virus is incapable of infecting.
How does an oily virus gain access to an aqueous environment when oil and water don't mix?
At the same time, in the environment the virus is exposed to ultraviolet rays which chemically destroy the nucleic acid (RNA) that comprises the viral genomes (each particle has 2 copies of its genome). This mutates the virus out of existence, further reducing viability.
How can a virus which is dead by ultraviolet light can infect other people at the same time?
The "oily" refers to fatty acids which are in a bilayer. The FAs have a hydrophillic head and hydrophobic tail, the tails touch one another. So the oil and water analogy makes it so that the pressures exerted in the aqueous environment keep the viral envelope intact. If a virus is dead by UV, if it's DNA/RNA is inactivated, its receptor proteins may still be activated and can insert the damaged DNA/RNA, which in most cases does nothing or some very rare things.
Disinfectant on very dirty surfaces may be effective for HIV cleaning. Biofilms caused by large amounts of bacteria may harbour viruses as well. Mucosal, phlegmy and bloody surfaces for example. So disinfectant to destroy the biofilm and virus is a good strategy. Otherwise, if the surface is relatively clean, like a lab bench, then that would be a waste. A good strategy may be to simply disinfect the surface before and after use. But once per day would probably be way more than enough because a surface exposed to regular air is unlikely to get HIV on it, unless you are in a hospital with bleeding HIV patients.
-
HIV is an internal problem caused by bad diet, alcohol, drugs, lack of vitamins, sleep deprivation etc. Using external cleaning agents will be ineffective. Note - There are no viruses involved in HIV.
So, would you be content to be injected with a suspension of HIV?
Or are you not that sure of yourself?
-
Thanks for all of your responses! ( Most of them). I think he problem is more of an OCD problem than anything. Her response to all the facts about the environmental deactivation was "it may be dead, but the virus is still there". I think she believes that a disinfectant makes it disappear. (In her mind) OCD.
-
OCD situation.
I don't want to divert this thread but just like to check that your student is receiving treatment. OCD is a very disruptive to a person's life but responds to treatment, the younger the person when diagnosed the better chance of improved life.
-
HIV is an internal problem caused by bad diet, alcohol, drugs, lack of vitamins, sleep deprivation etc. Using external cleaning agents will be ineffective. Note - There are no viruses involved in HIV.
So, would you be content to be injected with a suspension of HIV?
Or are you not that sure of yourself?
Injection is an unnatural process which doesn't occur in nature. Thus, injecting oneself with someone else's blood wouldn't be a good idea, especially if that person had a bad diet and their blood was dirty. Regardless, I would imagine that if you injected me with a small dose of virus, cancer or bacteria, that it would have no effect because my body system is clean and healthy and would destroy and eliminate any toxic substances very quickly.
-
HIV is an internal problem caused by bad diet, alcohol, drugs, lack of vitamins, sleep deprivation etc. Using external cleaning agents will be ineffective. Note - There are no viruses involved in HIV.
So, would you be content to be injected with a suspension of HIV?
Or are you not that sure of yourself?
Injection is an unnatural process which doesn't occur in nature. Thus, injecting oneself with someone else's blood wouldn't be a good idea, especially if that person had a bad diet and their blood was dirty. Regardless, I would imagine that if you injected me with a small dose of virus, cancer or bacteria, that it would have no effect because my body system is clean and healthy and would destroy and eliminate any toxic substances very quickly.
You have all sorts of organisms living inside you. Otherwise you would likely be dead. Stop the nonsense.
-
Injection is an unnatural process which doesn't occur in nature.
I wish someone would tell that to the bee that stung me last week.
Also a quiet word to wasps, mosquitos, a large number of parasitic wasps, nettles, etc
-
Injection is an unnatural process which doesn't occur in nature. Thus, injecting oneself with someone else's blood wouldn't be a good idea, especially if that person had a bad diet and their blood was dirty. Regardless, I would imagine that if you injected me with a small dose of virus, cancer or bacteria, that it would have no effect because my body system is clean and healthy and would destroy and eliminate any toxic substances very quickly.
As has been pointed out, injection (including the injection of microorganisms like malaria) is natural, denying it is silly.
Also this "injecting oneself with someone else's blood " which is usually referred to as a blood transfusion is often life saving.
So the idea that it "wouldn't be a good idea," is nonsense.
Viruses, cancers and bacteria are not in traditional use of the phrase "toxic substances" so the rest of your post makes little sense.
More details of Atkhenaken's mistaken idea that viruses are not involved in sickness can be found here
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=68196.0
Atkhenaken
if you want to rehash that suggestion can you do it in that thread rather than cluttering up this one please?
-
pictured: HIV-1 virions
(https://i2.wp.com/phil.cdc.gov/PHIL_Images/11279/11279_lores.jpg?zoom=2)
1. Where do viruses go to when they are not infecting people?
Disney World
2. There is no description of what part of the body this is.
Once again, that would be due to the fact that the pictured virions are budding from a [cultured] lymphocyte.
Do you understand what a culture is? Pick up a textbook genius.
3. There are no distinguishing features which tell us that these are HIV viruses.
I already answered your question. Your lack of comprehension is quite annoying. The pictured HIV-1 virions are merely in the early stage of morphogenesis. They haven't penetrated the plasma membrane, exited the nucleus and obtained a lipid bilayer envelope; they're not even mature or infectious at this stage. Any "distinguishing features" like the cone-shaped core characteristics appear following maturation; see figure 1 for reference.
Additionally, since color-enhanced models and/or photos of viruses seem to encourage your baseless comments.... I also included a non color-enhanced photo of a virus which you can share with other conspiracy theorists; see figure 2.
figure 1.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19460/figure/A289/?report=objectonly
figure 2.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8174/figure/A2262/?report=objectonly
4. How can you distinguish or know that a virus is budding or not budding?
By observing the virions crossing the plasma membrane and obtaining a lipid envelope. That's what retroviruses do genius.
5. How can something that requires the internal mechanisms of a cell to grow; suddenly grow, outside of a cell environment?
Be less vague if you'd like an answer.
6. There are no exterior receptor nodules which are apparent in the text (digital) diagrams.
What are you talking about? They're premature virions.