Print Page - collective unconscious and the number 137

A new book just came out called , " Deciphering the Cosmic Number "..The Strange Friendship of Wolfgang Pauli and Carl Jung " by Arthur I. Miller...28$ , 275 pages... this book is amazing and pretty much explains everything I have discovered in the last 18 years concerning the collective unconscious module of 37 and .891891891 as it relates to the mysticism of the Kabbala , Rosicrusians , Kepler , Newton , Eddington , Freud , Leahy's dream number 2808 , Dengler's name change number 1069 , Van Halen's 5150 , John of Patmos ( 666 and 144 ) , Pythagoras , the Buddic number 108 , Fermat's Last Theroem modules, the Great pyramid, etc. and the fine-structure constant. It is the best book I have read yet on this subject. From the inside jacket cover :

" The extraordinary story of the psychoanalyst Carl Jung and the physicist Wolfgang Pauli and their struggle to quantify the unconscious."

Is there a number at the root of the universe ? A primal number that everything in the world hinges on ? Physicists , psychologists , and mystics throughout history have pondered this question. Some have proposed three, as in the Trinity and the three dimensions: some have suggested four , as in the seasons, directions and number of limbs. Or is the answer " 137 ", which describes the fine-structure constant of the atom and also happens to be the sum of the Hebrew letters of the word " Kabbalah"......This expertly narrated, lavishly illustrated dual biography tells the story of these mavericks in search of the cosmic number--a quest that takes them deep into the works of medieval alchemists,dream interpretation, Johannes Kepler, and even the Chinese book of changes , the I Ching. It is a story that ranges across time and space , and illustrates the curious yet profound intersection of modern science with alchemy and mysticism......Arthur I. Miller is professor emeritus at University College London....

...this is a must read!!! J.Iuliano

Wow! And only $28 too. What a steal!

I would have thought it should have been $137.00 ........ But what do I know???

Quote from: J.Iuliano on 13/09/2009 22:07:36

Or is the answer " 137 ", which describes the fine-structure constant of the atom and also happens to be the sum of the Hebrew letters of the word " Kabbalah".

You failed!
according to wikipedia, the Fine structure constant is α = 7.297352570(5)×10−3 which happens to be the sum of the Hebrew letters of the word "shenanigans"!

Hey , good news for the synapticly challenged fudge brains ( geezwad or whatever his name is ) , the book is now available in comic book form , color illustrations even , don't worry not too many big words ,and guess what , no evil math , yahoo... now available one time only for $1.37, and also as a bonus the latest , hot Britanny Spears video , get it now before they sell out, ( she's commando in this one ...yippee ) .....sorry got into the wrong forum on this one , the naked thing should have been a dead giveaway....My Bad .....J.Iuliano

$1.37????? Hmmmm I wonder why!

Quote from: J.Iuliano on 15/09/2009 03:27:49

Hey , good news for the synapticly challenged

Synapticly. Hmmm? I rather like the sound of that. Might be a lot of fun to get your synapses tickled.

As Ken Dodd put it - "Hello Missus. How tickled I am to see your synapses."

Quote from: J.Iuliano on 15/09/2009 03:27:49

Hey , good news for the synapticly challenged fudge brains ( geezwad or whatever his name is ) , the book is now available in comic book form , color illustrations even , don't worry not too many big words ,and guess what , no evil math , yahoo... now available one time only for $1.37, and also as a bonus the latest , hot Britanny Spears video , get it now before they sell out, ( she's commando in this one ...yippee ) .....sorry got into the wrong forum on this one , the naked thing should have been a dead giveaway....My Bad .....J.Iuliano

So you call me synaptically (<- if you want to invent words, stick to the rules!) challenged because I'm right?
Well, I'm right about the fine-structure constant, maybe not about the fact that the sum is the hebrew "shenanigans". Might have been "bollocks".. can't remember..

Sorry , get your Gematrics correct . The Kabbalic gematric symbolism for Nizzle is " buttocks " .... not
" bollocks "...J.Iuliano

( 288 ^(2/Pi)) / 100 = cos 137.036000986 (cosine in radians ).....a modern electrical phenomenon... 80 years old ...again sorry if you don't know what a radian is ( G-D government schools any how )

Kabbalic genesis number..." 288 sparks from broken vessels " .....approximately 4500 years old

2/Pi = the Giza plateau , Cheops pyramid ratio ...height to base leg ...Cheops pyramid age ...unknown ...extremely ancient...rumors say up to 10000 B.C. plus.... don't believe the politically correct official idiot from the Egyptian government, known to have changed by filing the measuring rods ( Els ) from ancient digs to fit his interpretation of the Egyptian cubit.

Cheops pyramid - built around 2589 - 2566 BC, not 10,000 years old.
Step pyramid - built around 2600 BC, oldest known pyramid.

The ancient Egyptians were, indeed, brilliant. How they built the pyramids to such exactitudes to celestial bodies, and the more modern Temple of Ramasses at Abu Simbel (1250BC) with such a fine attitude to the sun, is almost beyond belief.

But remember that these people also believed that Set (God of darkness & chaos) tricked his brother Osiris (God of the afterlife) into a golden sarcophagus, sealed it and floated it off down the Nile, so he could have Osiris's wife, their sister, Isis (Goddess of motherhood & fertility), instead of his current wife, also their sister, Nepthys.

Nepthys, (Goddess protector of the dead), finds Osiris and returns him to Isis. There is a battle between Set & Osiris. Osiris, weak from his internment, is killed by Set and cut into pieces, which he scatters thoughout the land. Nepthys collects the pieces and puts Osiris back together, minus his wedding tackle, which was cast into the Nile and eaten by a fish. This is why ancient Egyptians priests must not eat fish.

Once again Osiris and Isis are reunited and she becomes the mother of Horus (God of the sky & war).

To the ancient Egyptians, all this was as true as God, Allah, Moses, Jesus, Buddha and Mohamed are today to their respective religions.

So they may have been clever in some respects, but in others.......

All this '137' business is just nonsense, you are just continuing pagan beliefs.

Does this interesting prime number have anything to do with sharpening razor blades? At one time it was possible to buy a cardboard pyramid device. You put your dull razor blades under it overnight and the pyramid concentrated certain forces overnight so that your blades were sharp the next day.

Does anyone happen to remember the ad. I'm on about?

I have a vague recollection of this. But 'vague' is the operative word here.

Look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_power (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_power)

Also I found this:

Quote from: searchwarp.com

Sharpen razor blades: This sounds really strange, but it's true.

A dull razor blade is impregnated with water molecules. Now a pyramid creates a condition of microwave-dehydration (on non-living things), and removes the water from the steel. The moon cycles can affect results, as the moon cycles affect earth's magnetic field, and pyramid energy is related to magnetism (that's why you have to have the pyramid lined up to magnetic north.

The blade sharpens best when it is lined up east-west, and the pyramid north-south. The razor is put under the pyramid after each use. A cheap razor that lasts 5 good shaves will last 50 or more. I have heard reports of as high as 250 as well.

With the lunar cycles affecting the pyramid, sometimes one will get a poor shave one night. Don't end the experiment, it will pick up again the next day. Now this is not a totally alien process, it just speeds up natural ones. If you leave a razor for 2 months it will lose the water, and "sharpen" itself.

The pyramid does this over night. Pyramids will keep the blade sharp, but I think it takes a long time to sharpen a dull one. Try 2 weeks and see it it helps. It's best to start with a fresh blade and maintain it. Using good quality razors and pyramids together can help a razor last for many, many uses.

And there's plenty more where that came from - http://searchwarp.com/swa371631.htm (http://searchwarp.com/swa371631.htm)

That's fantastic. Thanks Don_1

I propose an experiment. Send me a few quid and I'll nip up to Kelowna and evaluate the quality of their pyramid aged wine. In the interests of science I'm sure they will let me spend the night in it to test its restorative powers.

A single experiment is of no scientific value.

However, your investigation could prove to be of great importance to the whole of mankind. I shall assist you in your quest.

"Oi! You. Yeah, you with big *hick* attributes (BURP) crack open another pyramid of *hick* the 1977 vintage".

(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-eatdrink007.gif&hash=5a83f4620bd2d8146450f1b6bc75fb55) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)

Funny.. and 13 posts to :)

oh wait make that 14.

Hey I'm craving to watch the Hitch hikers guide to the galaxy.. I miss the depressed computer.

Quote from: Don_1 on 18/09/2009 08:25:14

A single experiment is of no scientific value.

However, your investigation could prove to be of great importance to the whole of mankind. I shall assist you in your quest.

"Oi! You. Yeah, you with big *hick* attributes (BURP) crack open another pyramid of *hick* the 1977 vintage".

(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-eatdrink007.gif&hash=5a83f4620bd2d8146450f1b6bc75fb55) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)

LMAO! Thanks

This is a mathematical interpretation of W.Pauli's dream " the vision of the world clock "...page 151:

" Then Pauli has a dream that he calls " the great vision - the vision of the world clock". It is an impression of " the most sublime harmony " he tells Jung, and it fills him with happiness and peace:

There is a vertical and horizontal circle , having a common center. This is a world clock. It is supported by a black bird. The vertical circle is a blue disc with a white border divided into 4*8=32 partitions. A pointer rotates upon it. The horizontal circle consists of four colors. On it stand four little men with pendulums and around it is laid the ring that once dark is now golden....The clock has three rhythms or pulses:

1....The small pulse: the pointer on the blue vertical disk advances by 1/32.

2...The middle pulse: one complete revolution of the pointer. At the same time the horizontal circle advances by 1/32.

3...The great pulse: 32 middle pulses are equal to one revolution of the golden ring.

( end book quote)

To interpret this dream one determines the total number of clicks ( small pulses ) that generates one revolution of of the golden ring , which is 32 cubed = 32768 small pulses. Assuming this is the total circumference of a two dimensional ring or circumference , the radius of this structure = 32768 = 2 * Pi * radius , where:

radius = 5215.189175...

...the collective unconsciuos constant .8918918914... is involved due to:

192962 / 37 = radius = 5215.1891891...
192962 = 2 * 7 * 11 * 1253

...assume now that 32768 equala the area of a disk , such that:

32768 = Pi * radius^2

..where radius = 102.1292238 . This form is Egyptian due to this equality: ( four is Pauli's reoccurring mandela )

( 102.1292238 / 37 ) + ( 4^2 ) = 18.76024929
( 10 ^ ( 4/Pi )) - ( 4^2 )) * 37 = 102.1307256 = radius
log 18.76024929 = 3.999997048 / Pi

...this is where the Egyptian form appears....( 4/Pi ) and it's connection to Pauli's obsession number , fine-structure constant:

( 10 ^ ( 3.999995526 / Pi )) / ( .37^2) = 137.035999701

...this is related to Prof. Leahy's dream, room key number ..2808:

( 10 ^ (( 2807.9999881 / 37 ) - 72 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

...and the triple logic cube number 82944 and the world clock generator 32: ( page 259):

( 10 ^ ( 82943.99304 / 32 ) 666 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

...note the number 72 which is 144/2:

( 10 ^ ( 143.9999879 / 37 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

...the most astounding connection of 32 to the geometric forms is the torus volume form ( golden ring ) where:

R = loop radius = fine-structure constant = 1/137.035999701 = aem
r = tube radius = Feigenbaum alpha = 2.502907875 = Fa ( width constant of the bifurcation map )

32 / (( Pi^Pi ) - 1 ) = 2 * ( Pi^2 ) * ( Fa^2 ) * aem

...this form is exact..!!
J.Iuliano

" = Fa "
'Nuff said.

At the bottom of the wiki page on pyramid power is tells of a Myth-busters experiment, it showed no difference to the blade or foodstuff. I suspect that if you could sharpen a razor blade that way then then it would have been in popular use during the 20th century.

Thanks for the searchwarp link don_1 never laughed so much, orgone energy indeed. LOL!

A mathematical interpretation of Pauli's dream of the " imaginary number " , i , square root of negative one. ( page 185 )

" In 1948 , around the time of the spring equinox , Pauli had two dreams. For him the equinoxes , he said were times of " relative psychic instability , which can manifest itself both negatively and positively ( creatively ) " . The dreams that arose at those times were always of particular significance. His dreams were full of mathematical symbols. In one of them , i , appears , i , being the square root of -1. i is an " imaginary number" because it is not one of the numbers we use in daily life -- the so called real numbers. Neverthe less , i often functions to unify complicated formulas by making them more compact.
In one of his dreams a woman brings Pauli a bird. It lays an egg that then divides into two eggs. Then he notices that he has another egg in his hand which makes three. Suddenly the egg in his hand divides into two. He now has four , a quaternity has appeared. Before his eyes the four eggs morph into four mathematical symbols , in two groups , side by side:

cos(delta)/2 sin(delta)/2
-------------------- ------------------
cos(delta)/2 sin(delta)/2

...cos(cosine) and sin(sine) are quantities from trigonometry ( a form of mathematics that deals with triangles. ), while delta is the angle formed by two sides of a triangle. These four symbols coalsce into a simple expression , unified by the symbol , i :

cos(delta)/2 + i sin(delta)/2
-----------------------------------------
cos(delta)/2 - i sin(delta)/2

...this expression is well known to mathematicians. In his dream he forms this expression into an equation:

cos(delta)/2 + i sin(delta)/2
---------------------------------------------- = e ^ i(delta)
cos(delta)/25 - i sin(delta)/2

....where e , the " base of the natural logarithms " has a numerical value of 2.718281828...( referred to an irrational number ) and e ^ i(delta) has a magnitude of 1. The insertion of i into these sets of four created a unity . Reflecting on the eggs in his dream , Pauli reralized that it was precisely what Maria Prophetissa , the early practioner of alchemy , had described some seventeen centuries earlier: " One becomes two , two becomes three , and out of the third comes the One as the fourth ". This transformation he noticed , " typically comes about for me through mathematics." Describing it to Jung , he explains that e ^ i(delta) is a number that always lies on a circle of radius 1. Through the power of the mathematical symbol i , a mandela has appeared in the form of a circle. In Pauli's dream i , " has the irrational function of uniting pairs of opposites -- the cosine and sine functions arranged in two groups of opposites - " and thus producing wholeness ". But e too is irrational , it is an irrational number. This shows , he says , that mathematics , " is a symbolic description ( of nature ) par exellence ". Mathematical symbols, are the perfect way to unite and represent counterintuitive features of the quantum world , such as the wave particle duality , which can never be visualized.
Reflecting further , Pauli suggests that the succesive splittings of the eggs are analagous to the splitting of spectral lines. When one examines the fine-structure of a spectral line, the spectroscope shows that what appears to be a single line is actually two and that the spacing between the two lines is defined by the number 137. In that case could it be , he wondered , that two was the predominate number in physics , not four? In both physics and psychology there were complementary opposites suggesting that two was the predominate number in the psyche as well. But four - the quanternity- had appeared in his dreams, signifying the wholeness of the material world and our conscious knowledge of it as well as the unconscious. Pauli's discovery of the fourth quantum number indicated precisely the need for this wholeness and therefore, although it was surprising at first , it should have been expected all along , given that four was the archetype of completeness....( end of book quote)

A mathematical analysis of Pauli's dream archetypes revealed some interesting facts. In the modern measuring systems of angular forms, ,there are three basic forms ( Pauli's archetype of the trinity ) , the radian ( 180/Pi ) , the degree form ( 360 degrees in the unit circle ) ) and the gradiant ( 100 ). It can be shown the following equalities:

cos137.036006272 / ( 10 ^ ( -2/Pi )) = e ^ ( cos137.036006272 * -2 / Pi )
radians degrees

...there are two archetypes here, the Cheops pyramid constructs , 2/Pi , and Pauli's dream number , natural log e. Amazingly the transformation of the two angular systems only occurs through Pauli's dream archetypes, the natural log e , and the Cheops constructs , 2/Pi . Pauli was actually very close in his dream state to the unification of the two forms due to this fantastic formula that links Euler's discovery ( 1700's ) of natural log e , and the imaginary number i , or square root of negative one:

i ^ i = e ^ - ( Pi/2 )

...Euler showed that the imaginary number i to the power of itself ( Pauli's archetype of self unity ) is actually a real number :

e ^ ( i * Pi ) + 1 = 0

...this formula is generally acknowledged as one of the deepest mathematical formulas in mathematics ! However there is a mathematical form that exists that definitely shows Pauli's dream state archetypes in a simplified formula. This formula unifies Pauli's archetypes of the primal number 137 , natural log e , the Eulerian form i^i , and the unification of the two angular measurement systerms , radians and degrees:

i ^ i = ( cos137.036004347 ^ cos137.036004347 ) / 10
radians degrees

...the natural log e can be separated from this form using the ancient archetype , Cheops pyramid constructs...2/Pi !!

e = ( cos137.036004347 ^ ( cos137.036004347 * - 2 / Pi )) / ( 10 ^ -( 2/ Pi ))
radians degrees

...the latter formula unifies four archetypes: the natural log e , the primal number 137 , the unification of the two angular measuring forms ( radians - degrees ) and the Cheops pyramid constructs...2/Pi. As a further extension of Pauli's dream of natural log e and the sine and cosine functions is the invovement of the famous , rather recent , discovery ( 1975 ) of the Feigenbaum delta constant ( 4.669201609..) in Pauli's dream patterns:

cos^-1(( IN(( tan Fd ) / 100 )) / 2 ) = 137.0359996 .....Fd = 4.66920251
degree radian

( tan Fd ) ^ ( -1/Pi ) = cos 137.0359997 ....Fd = 4.669204754
radian radian

....to separate into the degree and radian forms:

( IN (( tan Fd ) / 100 )) / 2 = cos 137.03599996 ...Fd = 4.66920251
radians degrees

(tan Fd ) ^ ( -1/Pi ) = cos 137.0359997 ....Fd = 4.669204754
radians radians

...note how the reciprocal log e ( IN function ) bridges the two angular measuring systems...degrees to radians. To isolate the Feigenbaum delta constant , Fd , one can use both the cosine and sine ala Pauli's dream state through a 90 degree rotoation:

100 * ( e ^ ( 2 * sin(-137.035999701 + 90 ))) = tan 4.66920251
degree radian

100 * ( e ^ ( 2 * cos(137.035999701 )) = tan 4.66920251
degree radian

( Page 263)

" From there Pauli went to California where Feynman for one , had no compunction about telling the great ( Neils) Bohr that he was an idiot. Audiences there too offered rutheless critisism. Pauli was beginning to conclude , as he wrote to Heisenberg later that year , that " something entirely new , in other words very ' crazy ' (was) needed " , if he and Heisenberg were to crack the mystery of the masses of the elementary particles , one of the key aims of their unified theory ...( end of book quote )

...the electron and proton energy constants ( .510998908 and 938.272029 respectively ) can be determined from these ancient archetype symbols:

( 82944 ^ ( 1/Pi )) * 6.66 / ( .510998908 ^ 2 ) = 938.272024 + 1/136
D.G.Leahy John of Patmos electron proton Eddington

938.272029 * ( .510998908 ^ 2 ) / 666 = cos 137.03599789

( 82944 ^ ( 1/Pi )) / 100 = cos 137.036000986
radians

( 100 ^ Pi ) / 82944 = tan 4.669204313
radians

...the reason for the hidden meaning of 666....from Page 202:

" Jung enthusiastically agreed that mathematical probability must correspond to an archetype. Bringing archetypes and synchronicity together , he suggested , that the archetype " represents nothing else but the probability of psychic events ". Although all of us are born with a collective unconscious made up of archetypes , it is not inevitable that any single archetypal image will actually appear in our consciousness. It is only highly probable - not inevitable - that patients recovering from deep depression will draw mandelas. The laws of probability in quantum physics is a law of nature and laws of nature contain the patterns of the cosmos. Given that the archetype is also a pattern of behavior , does this mean that laws of nature have their bases in psychic premises? And how do archetypes enter our human minds in the first place? Jung suggested that they were " out there ", ready to be plucked out of the air , and in this way entered our minds. We are , after all , merely small elements in one world. The origin of the word is immaterial , Jung insisted , its what the archetypes can do that is important. Returning to the ever-fascinating issue of threes and fours, Jung percieved that quantum physics widened the threesome of classical physics--space, time and causality-- to include synchronicity , thereby becoming a foursome. This happy development solved the age old problem of alchemists , encapsulated in the " so-called axiom of Maria Prophetissa: Out of the Third comes the One as the Fourth....this encryptic observation confirms what I said above , that in principle new points of view are not as a rule discovered in territory that is already well known , but in out-of-the-way places that may even be avoided because of their bad name ". ( end of book quote )

...this explains why the beast number 666 is a pariah ,that is, to " be avoided because of their bad name " since it has lain in " territory that is already well known , but in out-of-the-way places "....This is the deep irony of the collective unconscious forms in that as popular culture has set up walls of non-appraoch to the real answers of things , that one must look into exactly the things that have been road blocked by the culture of the times at hand to seek the answers both spiritually and materially with human philosophy linking both by a common psychic archetype.

...Eddingtons obsession with 136....from Page 250:

" Eddington argued that according to relativity theory , particles cannot be considered in isolation but only in relationship to each other and therefore any theory of the electron has to deal with at least two electrons. Applying a special mathematics that he had invented , Eddington found that each electron could be described using sixteen E-numbers ( E stood for Eddington ). Multiplying 16 by 16 gave a total of 256 different ways in which electrons could combine with each other. He then showed that, of these 256 ways , only 136 are actually possible ; 120 are not. He wrote this mathematically as 256 = 136 + 120 . Like pulling a rabbit out of a hat , he thus magically produced the number 136 from purely mathematical ( if dubious ) reasoning. Of course 136 was not 137 , but for Eddington it was close enough. He was convinced that the elusive " one " would " not be long in turning up ". As the physicist Paul Dirac put it, " Eddington first proved for 136 and when experiment raised to 137 , he gave proof of that ! The obsessive pursuit of 137, took over Eddington's life." ( end of book quote)

....Numbers as archetypes...from Page 212:

" By the early 1950's Jung agreed with Pauli that numbers un-doubtedly were archetypal and added that they could " amplify themselves immediately and freely through mythological statements ", such as the one attributed to Maria Prophetissa . The common ground between physics and psychology was not to do with parallel concepts " but rather in that ancient spiritual 'dynamis' of numbers...the archetypal numinosity of numbers impress itself on the one hand in Pythagorean , Gnostic, and Kabbalistic ( Gematria ) speculation and in the other hand in the arithemetical method of the mantic(divinatory) procedures in the I Ching, in geometry and horoscopy." This Jung wrote to Pauli in 1955.
Mathematicians might argue over whether numbers were originally invented or discovered , just as psychologists debate whether archetypes are innate or aquired. " In my view both are true " , wrote Jung. Jung was not interested in what mathematitians did with numbers , but what number itself does when given the opportunity. This is certainly the method that has proved particularly succesful in the field of archetypal ideas. He was curious in other words, about whether numbers have mystical powers and what these might be. It was certainly a fresh approach to numbers , evidence of the fruitfulness of the collaboration between the two men ". ( end of book quote )

J.Iuliano

Brainwashed? Who, me? Not on your Nellie.

I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book. I will go out tomorrow and buy the book..................

Awh, all those numbers. makes my head hurt.

6 I believe in if done by 2
A 3inity might be brought2
For what more 2 say I do not know ?

Concerning the collective unconscious constant which is any number when divided by the integer 37 creates the modulo decimal remainder , .891891891..., which is the link to the fine-structure constant:

( 10 ^ ( 143.9999879 / 37 )) / 37 / 18 = sqrt 137.035999701

...there have been many numbers associated to the divisor 37 and the collective unconscious forms:

Leahy's dream number .....2808
Van Halen's number..........5150
Hindu number ..................108
Druid number....................144
Hebrew number ................288
John of Patmos number.....1260 and 666
Leahy triple logic number....82944
Denglers number as name...1069
John Michell number...........1080+666 = 1746
Mayan/Aztec number ........2304
R.Tomes harmonic.............3456....etc.

...the key has always been the divisor number 37. The following is from an article in the Jan. 10 , 2009 , magazine , New Scientist, called , " Inside the Mind of a Autistic Savant ". The article goes on to talk about the savant Daniel Tammet , who is a human calculator of whose one of many feats , set a European record for the number of digits of Pi he recited from memory ( 22514 ). The article interviewer , Celeste Biever , interviewed D. Tammet and here is a portion of her interview concerning the number 37 and D. Tammet's fascination with this particular number:

Question: When did you realize you had special talents?
Tammet: At the age of 8 or 9 , I was being taught maths at school and realised I could do the sums quickly , intuitively and in my own way--not using the techniques we were taught. I got so far ahead of the other children that I ran out of textbooks. I was aware already that I was different because of my autism, but at that point I realised that the relationship I had with numbers was different.
Question: To most people, the things you can do with your memory seems like magic. How do you do it ?
Tammet: The response that people often have to what I can do is one of " gee whiz" but I want to push back against that. One of the purposes of the book I've written , " Embracing the Wide Sky " , is to demystify this, to show the hidden processes behind my number skills. I have a relationship with numbers that is similar to the relationship that most people have with language. When people think of words they don't think of them as separate items , atomised in their head , they understand them intuitively and subconsciously as belonging to an interconnected web of other words.
Question : Can you give an example?
Tammet: You would'nt use a word like " giraffe " without understanding what the words " neck " or " tall " or " animal " mean. Words only make sense when they are in this web of interconnected meanings and I have the same thing with numbers . Numbers belong to a web. When somebody gives me a number , I immediately visualise it and how it relates to other numbers. I also see the patterns those relationships produce and manipulate them in my head to arrive at a solution, if its a sum , or to identify if there is a prime.
Question: But how do you visualise a number ? In the same way I visualise a giraffe ?
Tammet: Every number has a texture. If it is a " lumpy " number then immediately my mind will relate it to other numbers which are lumpy--the lumpiness will tell me there is a relationship , there is a common divisor , or a pattern between the digits.
Question: Can you give me an example of a " lumpy " number ?
Tammet: For me the ideal lumpy number is 37 . It's like porridge. So 111 , a very pretty number which is 3 times 37 , is lumpy but it is also round. It takes on the properties of both 37 and 3 , which is round. It's an intuitive and visual way of doing maths and thinking about numbers.
Question: Why do you think you treat numbers this way ?
Tammet: When I was growing up, because of my autism , I didn't make friends. Numbers filled that gap. The numbers came alive. My mind was able to pick out patterns and to make sense of them. It was similar to how a child would aquire his first language....
Question: What can we learn from the way your mind works ?
Tammet: The differences between savant and non-savant ability have been exaggerated. Savants are not freaks, cut off from the rest of humanity. The thinking of savants is an extreme form of the kind everyone has. The aim of my book is to show that minds that function differently such as mine , are not so strange , and that anyone can learn from them. I also hope to clear up some misconceptions about savant abilities and what it means to be intelligent or gifted ...( end of article quote )

Wolfgang Pauli knew through his mandelas and the collective unconscious parameters of Carl Jung that the fine-structure constant ( 1/137.035999701 ) , a primal number , has a connectiveness to the primal numbers of man. This connectiveness number is the integer...37:

Leahy dream number ....2808:
( 10 ^ (( 2807.9999879 / 37 ) - 72 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Van Halen's number ...5150:
( 10 ^ (( 5149.99999881 / 3.7 ) - 1388 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Hindu number....108:
( 10 ^ ( 107.999999879 / .37 ) - 288 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Druid , John of Patmos number ...144:
( 10 ^ ( 143.999987919 / 37 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

John of Patmos numbers ...1260 and 666:
( 10 ^ (( 1259.99978254 / 666 ) + 2 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Leahy's triple logic number ...82944:
( 10 ^ ( 82943.9930413 / 32 / 666 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Plato's number of the world soul...2592:
( 10 ^ ( 2591.99978254 / 666 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Dengler's name change number ...1069:
( 10 ^ (( 1068.99998792 / 37 ) - 25 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Mayan/Aztec number ...2304:
( 10 ^ (( 2303.99978254 + 288 ) /666 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

Harlston's Hunab number ( Aztec) ...378
378 + 288 = 666

R.Tomes master harmionic number ...3456:
( 10 ^ (( 3455.999789 / 666 ) - 46 ) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

J.Iuliano

That is a very interesting thought process however, treating numbers like words ... I notice that I think differently when it comes to numbers, where as I don't think at all with words.

I forgot to mention that the original number of the beast was 616 and was translated 100 years later as 666 which most now assume it to be.

I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. The number 137 is most famous for its reciprocal being the numerical value of the fine structure constant. One divided by 137 is very close to the ratio that shows up in analysis of the fine structure of spectral lines of starlight. It has a direct relationship with the magnitude of the electric charge of the electron.

(page 256...Fibonacci numbers)

" Fibonacci numbers are a sequence of whole numbers in which each number starting from the third is the sum of the two previous ones. The sequence begins , 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,377,987, and so on. If we take the ratio of successive numbers in the series.....we reach 1.6180339875 , the Golden Ratio , which has been a guideline for architecture since the days of ancient Greece. It appears on the pyramids of ancient Egypt , the Parthenon in Athens , and the United Nations building in New York City. Fibonacci numbers were discovered by the Italian mathematician Leonaro Fibonacci in the twelfth century. It was Kepler who discovered their relationship to the Golden Ratio. Then Eduardo Lucas, a French mathematician , used them to develop the Lucas numbers in the nineteenth century. Lucas numbers are like Fibonacci numbers but begin with 2: 2,1,3,4,7,11,15,29,47,76,123 and so on. Like the Fibonacci series, the Lucas series also produce the Golden Ratio....Because all these numbers are related, any formula for 137 in terms of the Golden Ratio , can be rewritten in terms of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers , though whether this is anything more than abstruse relationships between certain numbers is not clear. " ....( end book quote )

The following shows how the integer 37 clears up this abstuseness between the Golden Ratio and the primal number ....137.035999701 ( fine-structure constant ):

....the integer 37 has a unique relationship to the fine-structure constant ( 1/137.035999701 ) through the cosine in radians form and the Golden Ratio ( 1.6180339875.. ). First is how to convert Pi to the Golden Ratio:

cos( Pi * .2 ) = 1.6180339875 / 2

...using this form and the speed of light , c = 299792458 m/s , one has the following:

cos( c / 137.0359997078 / .37 ) = 1.618039177 / 2

cos( c / 137.03599970078 / ( .37 ^ 2 )) = unity

...thus by squaring .37 one can transform the Fibonacci constant ( 1.6180339875 ) into unity.

(page 250....relating 2*Pi to the fine-structure constant )

" Eddington had a strong mystical streak. To him mysticism offered an escape from the closed logical system of physics. " It is reasonable to inquire whether in the mystical illusions of man there is not a reflection of an understanding reality " , he mused. Like Pauli , he struggled with the dichotomy between these two worlds, both equally invisible , of science and the spirit. He was sure that mathematics was the key that would open the door between these two worlds and he set about an obsessive quest to derive 137 , however he could. The equation for the fine-structure is : ( note formula in the book is wrong ??)

1/137.035999701 = 2 * Pi * ( ev^2 ) * c / ( 10^7 ) / h ...( correct formula )

...and the charge of the electron ev appears in this equation as ev * ev or ev^2. As a result, besides being a measure of the fine-structure of spectral lines , the fine-structure constant ( 1/137 ) also measures how strongly two electrons interact. " ( end book quote )

...how the archtypal numbers determine the interaction between two electrons through the electron energy...( .510998908=electron )...( 938.272029=proton )

( 82944 ^ ( 1/Pi )) * 6.66 / ( .510998908 ^ 2 ) = 938.272024 + ( 1/136 )

82944 = Leahy's number ( triple logic cube )
6.66 = John of Patmos number ( 37*18 )
.510998908 = electron energy ( 2008NIST )
938.272029 = proton energy ( 2008NIST )
136 = Eddington's original primal number for fine-structure

( page 251 ...Pauli and 137 )

" It seemed that Pauli had not caught the 137 bug. In February 1934, however , he wrote to Heisenberg that the key problem was " fixing 1/137 " and the ' Atomistik ' of the electron charge . " At the time he was trying to find a version of quantum-electro-dynamics in which the mass and charge of the electron were not infinite , but no matter which way he manipulated his equations , the concept of electric charge always entered--hence the mystical " Atomistik - atom plus mystic of the electron charge. " ( end of book quote )

...how the archetypes , Cheops pyramid constructs ( 2/Pi ) and the John of Patmos numbers , 144 and 666 , relate to 37 and the fine-structure constant ( 1/137 )

144 / 37 = log( 666 * sqrt 137.035999701 ) .....143.999987919
2 / Pi = log( .37 * sqrt 137.035999701 ) .....1.9999977629

.... the entire unification of the archtypal number forms:

cos(( 10 ^ ( 4/Pi )) * c / 137.0359997004 ) = 938.271917 / 1000
cos( (.37^-1 ) * c / 137.03599970078 ) = 1.618039177 / 2
cos( (.37^-2 ) * c / 137.03599970078 ) = unity
( cos( (.37^-2 ) * ( 10 ^ ( 3.999995508 / Pi ))) * 666 / (.510998908^2 ) = 938.272106

J.Iuliano

number 137 , , , , A fine structure constant:
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘. / Feynman. /

If he meant that as a joke, Feynman never thought it through very well, afterall the fine structure is not a damnation for physicists, for if it was not the way it was, no one would be here today to make such ponderances.

Quote from: Vern on 28/10/2009 04:17:12

I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. The number 137 is most famous for its reciprocal being the numerical value of the fine structure constant. One divided by 137 is very close to the ratio that shows up in analysis of the fine structure of spectral lines of starlight. It has a direct relationship with the magnitude of the electric charge of the electron.

136 means sound or wave
137 is creation
138 mean little atom or material

One of our expert who read the book Kabbalah has noticed this coincidence of numbers 136, 137 and 138 in Kabbalah.
"About the fine structure constant, the 137, Cassani explains that it is an integer Why is the wave number of the form that the electron states in his swing around the nucleus. He also says story But it can vary the number Between 136 and 138, although still average 137. Do not worry, Kabbalah. already has a ready explanation for these numbers also cause: 136 And the word "voice" kol (Quf - Vav - Lamed). As you know the Through voice waves. 138 is instead the word "particle", Chelek (Cheit - Lamed - Quf), which means "piece of matter." This is the same name that modern Judaism is used to call the particles Nuclear! So we have to part the waves and the other particle: The two aspects of reality that physics has discovered. As you know, every phenomenon can be interpreted has come a wave motion is like a passage of particles. And one mediate between these aspects cause, symbolized by the 138 and 136, there is the 137, again Kabbalah. to reconcile with all of Creation! "

One of our expert who has read the book Kabbalah has noticed this coincidence of numbers 136, 137 and 138 in Kabbalah.
"About the fine structure constant, the 137, Cassani explains that this is a integer that corresponds to the wave number of the form that the electron states in his swing around the nucleus. He also says that this number can vary, however, between 136 and 138, although it remains on average 137. Do not worry, Kabbalah. already has a ready explanation for these two numbers:

136 is the word "voice" kol (Quf - Vav - Lamed). As you know the voice propagates through the waves.

138 is instead the word "particle", Chelek (Cheit - Lamed - Quf), which means "piece of matter." This is the same name that modern Judaism is used to call the particles Nuclear! So on the one hand we have the wave and the other particle, the two aspects of reality that physics has discovered. As you know, every phenomenon can be interpreted either as a wave motion is like a passage of particles. And to mediate between these two aspects, symbolized by the 136 and 138, there is the 137, again Kabbalah. to reconcile all creation! "

http://www.albertavevaragione.com/index.php?id=25&lang=en

The following is an example of the collective unconscious constant ( .891891891...) appearing in the structure of the purposefully placed constants that make up the fine-structure constant ---incorrectly..... if this was done for both equations , purposefully , then it is definitely strange behavior...:

( page 41...( the discovery of 137 )

" Sommerfield called the quantity that set the distance between the split spectral lines in this extra term the " fine-structure constant " and designated it with the Greek letter ( alpha ) , this equation was :

alpha = 2 * Pi * ( ev^2 ) / h / c . " ......( end book quote )

...this formula , as it appears multiple times in the book , is incorrect for the number 137. The formula for alpha is actually:

alpha = 2 * PI * ( ev^2 ) * c / h / ( 10^7 )

...however through a very strange coincidence the " wrong formula " can actually determine the fine-structure constant ( Sommerfield's alpha ) when using the reciprocal natural log e ( IN ) of the " wrong formula " :

IN( 2 * Pi * ( ev^2 ) / h / c ) = -5 * 49 * 11 * 1033 / ( 10^5 )

...1033 is a collective unconscious integer:

1033 / 37 = 2791.891891891...

....such that fine-structure is expressed as:

( 10 ^ (( 1032.9999998745 / .37 ) - 2788 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

....fantastic that the electron charge , Planck's constant and the speed of light has an integer like sub-structure when placed in reciprocal natural log e:

e ^ ( -5 * 49 * 11 * 1032.9999998745 * ( 10^5 ) = ( ev^2 ) * c / h-bar

....Amazingly the other " wrong formula " in the book does the same thing. On page 257 from the book , is Enrico Fermi's famous photograph of him standing next to a chalk board with the " wrong formula " for alpha written on it :

alpha = ( h-bar^2 ) / ev / c

( page 257 )

" It was an excellent joke-- and a joke comprehensible only to scientists. However the joke backfired when the photograph was used for a stamp to commemorate him ( Fermi ) after his death. So he was caught forever standing next to this iconic equation--incorrectly written. " ...( end book quote )

... even though it also does not represent alpha , Fermi's " wrong formula " has the same internal structure as the other " wrong formula " , that is the collective unconscious constant is embedded in the reciprocal natural log e :

FERMI .....wrong formula

( h^2 ) / 4 / ( Pi^2 ) / ev / c = e ^ ( ( 5^2 ) * -8 * 71 / 106.999932363 )

BOOK.......wrong formula

2 * Pi * ( ev^2 ) / h / c = e ^ ( -5 * 11 * 49 * 1032.99999944 / ( 10^5 ))

....fine-structure and the collective unconscious integers , 107 and 1033:

FERMI .......( 10 ^ (( 106.9999879 / 37 ) - 1 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

BOOK .......( 10 ^ (( 1032.99999988 / .37 ) - 2788 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.035999701

J.Iuliano

h= Planck's constant = 6.62606896 * 10^-34
c = speed of light = 299792458
ev = electic charge = 1.602176487 * 10^-19

The radius of the Earth has several mathematically holographic , gnomonic relationships to the metrics of Nature ( SI measurement ). The Earth's radius varies from 3947 miles ( polar ) to 3965 miles ( equatorial ) , the mean radius being approximately 3955 miles. One of the stranger gnomonic relationships is the collective unconscious root:

.891891891 ...modulo(37)

log(( 10 ^ ( 33/37 )) / 1.8 ) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250637549.1 in. = 3955.7694 miles

....note the modern metric length , 39.370078 with the primal number one-ten millionths (metric Earth quadrant ) part of the mandela quandrants( Wolfgang Pauli) .. Earth quarter circle , as converter to English inches. The simplest version is the archetype structure , Cheops pyramid with a height to base-leg ratio of 2/Pi:

2 / Pi * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250637700.9 in. = 3955.77179 miles

....the primal , integer number 37 is involved in several primal and physical constants , including the radian ( 180/Pi ). 37 can be considered here as the cross-Theomatics(37) with the integer 57 as the crescent , with 113 being one- half of the 5th century Chinese Pi....355/113 = 3.14159292...

log( sqrt( 37 * radian / 113 )) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250638954.5 in. = 3955.7916 miles
log ( 57 / ( radian ^ ( 2/PI ))) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250637485.7 in. = 3955.768 miles
log( sqrt( 37 * 180 / 355 )) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250638954.5 in. = 3955.7916 miles

...the mathematical constant Euler-Mascheroni , gamma = .577215665.. , often used in physics and number theory , has a very accurate representation of the Earth radius through
the integer 13 = Chinese Pi...100 + 13 ( thinking NOW, created 100 plus thirteen )

log( 13 * ( .577215665^2 )) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250637621.3 in. = 3955.7705 miles

...strangely to combine the two primal transcendental numbers , Pi and natural log e ( 2.718281828..) , one also uses the integer 13:

log (( 13 * e ) - ( Pi^3 ) )) * ( 10^7 ) * .39.370078 = 250640545.3 in. = 3955.8167 miles

...the electrical mystery of the fine-structure constant can be linked to the Earth radius due to the primal integer 37:

log( .37 * sqrt137.035999701 ) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250637420.6 in. = 3955.7674 miles

...the mass of the electron ( Me = 9.109382117 * 10^-31 kg ) can be combined to be the symbolic sum of the four cardinal directions , one for each quadrant of the circle , a sacred number :

log( 4 + ( sqrt( 1/Me/10^31 ))) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250638134.7 in. = 3955.77864 miles

( Page 186...( Pauli's dream of i )

"...Pauli realized that it was precisely what Maria Prophetessa , the early practioner of alchemy had described some seventeen centuries earlier: " One becomess Two , Two becomes Three and out of the third comes the One as the fourth . " This transformation he noticed , " typically comes about for me through mathematics . " ( end book quote )

...." One as the fourth" , means the Earth's radius ( the length that determines a single spherical object , or One ) and is equivalent to the inverse electron mass summed with Four. Thus the Earth sphere ( macro ) and the electron sphere ( micro ) are symbolically equal , linked through the sum of the four cardinal direction quadrants. All of the drawn and described mandelas of the Pauli-Jung converstions and corresponce ( 1945-1958 ) relating to dream ,drawn mandelas were actually representations of the electron sphere but unconsciously , from dream interpretations ,were drawn as cardinal directions attached to Earth-like symbols.

J.Iuliano

Sometimes the collective unconscious constant lies hidden away in mathematical integers , unassuming until driven out into the light. One of these forms is the rather ancient French metric to English inch conversion factor: ( A number that has evolved in 300 years to the modern equivalent below: )

39.370078 inces = one meter

....the metric conversion factor 39.37 is a collective unconscious constant when transformed by the fine-structure constant and 37:

( 39.37003937^2 ) / 37 = 41.8918914891....

...such that:

( 10 ^ ((( 39.3700392166^2 ) / 37 ) - 38 ) / 37 / 18 = sqrt 137.035999701

...so a modern measuring constant is actually an ancient primal number archetype that uses 37 and the fine-structure constant to express itself. This is interesting because the modern form evolved from the primitive ( 1670 ad )...39.592 inches , geometric foot , equals one meter to the more negotiated modern form ( a period of 330 years of refining and redefining the meter ) that exists today as exactly 39.370078 inches = 1 meter . This is the first time I have seen an archetypal number actually evolve over time to settle in as the collective unconscious constant versus the more common method of springing out of the unconscious in whole number integers , from the various ( human ) savant sources both ancient ( John of Patmos , Hindu , Plato , Sumerian etc. ) and modern ( D.G. Leahy , D. Tammet , M. Dengler , R. Tomes , Eddington , Pauli , etc. ) The fine-structure --37 meter derivation is 99.9999 % of the most recent definition of the meter , a length of red light vibration of a cesium atom , which is a difference in length of four thousandths of an inch , when compared to the 37 form. In researching the history of the metric length to find the source of the collective unconscious constant , it seems one only has to look pre-1866 , the date of the Metric Act ( 1866 ) which defined the meter as 39.37 English inches. In 1792 the quadrant meridian of a 9.5 degree arc from Dunkirk , France to Barcelona , Spain was measured at one-ten millionths of this distance to 32808992 English feet, which produced a meter of 39.3707904 English inches. In 1850 the meridian arc was recalculated to 32813000 , which is 39.3756 English inches per meter. No collective unconscious constant yet. Then in 1864 England decreed that the meter was 39.708 inches , which is even farther from the 39.37 squared number meter needed for the collective unconscious constant. However an amazing thing has appeared , the 1864 English meter is in itself a collective unconscious constant:

39708 / 37 = 10731.891891891...

...and then to make matters more complicated, the original number from the 1798 Mechain-Delambre , French expedition to measure the arc meridian from Dunkirk , France , to Barcelona , Spain was corrected in 1875 in the ten millionths factor of the quadrant to ( 10^7 + 2290 ) instead if 10^7 to allow for Earth curvature flatness ( oblateness ) . The correction factor 2290 , is a collective unconscious constant:

2290 / 37 = 61.891891891....

...finally in 1983 the meter was decreed to be the distance that light travels in 1/299792458 of a second. It hasn't changed since.....Strangely the final product is a collective unconscious constant:

( 299792458 / 2 / 7 / .37 ) - 57874988 = 3.891891891

...the fine-structure constant is:

light speed......... 10 ^ (( 299792458 2 / 7 / .37 ) - 57874988 ) / 37 / 18 = sqrt 137.035999701

meter................ 10 ^ ((( 39.3700392166 ^ 2 ) / 37 ) - 38 ) / 37 / 18 = sqrt 137.035999701

....according to the 1798 expedition , they calibrated everything to the French foot ( 144 ) through the toise

toises 57027 * 90 * 864 / ( 10^7 ) = 443.44 lines

...strangely the 864 integer when corrected by the log in base 10 of the collective unconscious constant:

( 10 ^ (( 144 / 37 ) - 7 ) + 864 / 863

...is equal to 99.9999998% of the 2008 NIST value of one of the most precisely measured constants in Nature , the G-minus two constant. This accuracy is to ten decimals:

G-minus two: 2008NIST = 1.00115965215

G-minus two = ( 864 + ( 10^ (( 144 / 37 ) - 7 ))) / ( 864 - 1 ) = 1.00115965195

...the above equation might be the source of the collective unconscious constant , linking it to the French foot as determined by 144 lines for .24839 ths of a meter ( year 1798 ) There is a pre-date to the 1798 , 864 , however when between the years 1735 to 1740 , the French survey teams measured the geodetic arc of the quadrant meridian as 439.15 lines . In 1740 they measured their number lines in toises and thus would convert by this formula for lines to French feet:

( 10^-7 ) * 57027 toises * 90 * 864 = 443.442 lines

...this is the formula source for the integer 864 dated 1740. Interestingly 864 is an ancient archetypal number , being an extension of the Hindu sacred number 108 and 432 ...( 864 / 2 / 2 / 2 = 108 )) .108 is also a collective unconscious constant. By one more doubling ( 864 * 2 = 1728 ) one is left with the most important number in algebraic mathematics the j-function constant of the Jacobian interval. Again doubling this ( 1728*2 = 3456 ) one is left with the mystic / mathematician , R.Tomes , and his master harmonic number...3456. Now it gets strange , both the 1740 and 1798 French expeditions to measure the geodetic arc meridian expressed their results in French foot-lines:

1735--1737.....geodetic arc meridian = 439.15 lines
1739.............. " " " = 440.5597 lines
1740.............. ": " " = 443.44 lines
1792.............. " " " = 3208992 * 12 = 393707904 English feet
1850.............. " " " = 32813000 * 12 = 393756000 English feet
1864.............. " " " = 33090000 * 12 = 397080000 English feet

...the French lines can be expressed by the collective unconscious constant ...37*18:

(( 37 * 18 ) ^ 2 ) / ( 10^ 3 ) = 443.556 lines

....uniting all measuring forms including the French toise:

39.37 / 12 / 144 / 57073 / 90 * ( 10^ 11 ) = 443.556 lines
328083328 / 144 / 57073 / 90 * ( 10^7 ) = 666^2

meter = 39.37
Enlish foot = 12
French foot = 144
French toise = 57073

.....in 1792 the English arc meridian was listed as 32808992 English feet or a difference of about 660 feet from the above formula :

32808992 / 144 / 57074.15 / 90 * ( 10^7 ) = 666^2

...by substituting the modern metric form 39.370078 into the formula above , results in a French toise of 57073.11:

39.370078 / 12 / 144 / 57073.114 / 90 * ( 10^14 ) = 666^2

...the amazing thing about the latter two formulas is that the number 32808992 is from 1792 while the modern meter 39.370078 is from 1983 , and their difference in toises is less than one- toise. An even stranger connection to this form is the Fermat solution node equation:

e ^ ( Pi + 8 ) = 68981.43253

...this equation multiplied by the harmonic mean of 37 and 57 equals the fine-structure constant:

e ^ ( 7.999999806 + Pi ) * (( 1/57 +1/37 ) ^ 2 ) = 137.03599701

...the roots of the metric transformation can describe fine-structure through the Fermat equation:

( 666^2 ) * 12 * 144 * 90 / ( 10^6 ) = e ^ ( 8.000005749 + Pi )

...the French foot is 144:

( 10^ 6 ) * 12 * ( 666^2 ) / 90 * 137.035999701 / (( 1/57 + 1/37 )) ^ 2 ) = 143.9991441

...to unify multiply by the toise:

( e ^ ( Pi + 8 )) * 57073.5 = 39.3701179 * 10^8 ....French meter

( e ^ ( Pi + 8 )) * 57073.5 / 12 = 32808431.58 * 10^2 ...English feet

...here is another form that shows precognition of the metric. In 1850, England decreed the arc meridian as , 32813000 English feet. This is a primal and archetypal number:

5 * ( 666^4 ) * ( 10^4 ) / 299792458 = 32813021.12

...note the accuracy to the 1850 English arc length 32813000 and the modern speed of light c = 299792458 m/s , the modern metric gauge:

32813000 / ( 10^4 ) / 5 / ( 665.9998928^4 ) = 1/299792458

....when using the collective unconscious number as integer ( 37*18 ) one is off by 21.1 English feet from the 1850 number:

( 666 ^ 4 ) * ( 10^4 ) * 5 / 299792458 = 32813021.123 English feet

EATHS RADIUS....

...how the Earths dimensions determined the meter. The Earths radius is not constant but varies from 6357 km = radius polar to 6378 km = radius equatorial. The approximate mean of the two radii boundaries is the Cheops pyramid constructs , 2/Pi

2 / Pi * 10^4 = 6366.19772 km

...this means that everything cancels to determine the raw meter , a Pi determined function!

radius polar = 3950.056 miles
radius equatorial = 3963.12 miles

3955.771795 * 5280 * 6 * Pi / (10^7) = 39.370078 inches

...the secret lies in 10^7 ( in physics called the Giorgi constant also known as one energy unit ..erg ) . In this case it is the perfect quadrant of the circumference of the Earth which makes 2/Pi redundant. ( probably known by the early French surveyors )

39.370078 inches / 20886475.08 earth radius feet * 10^7 quadrant = 6 * Pi

...deeper analysis reveals that the ratio of the modern mean earth radius measured in feet and the 1792 English number for the arc meridian quadrant ( 32808992 feet ) equals the Cheops pyramid ratio 2/Pi:

20886475.08 / 32808992 = 1.999963811 / Pi

20886475.08 / 32808398.34 = 2 / Pi

...it can be demonstrated the similarities between the Earth radius metric and the fine-structure constant metric:

3955.771795 * 5280 * 6 / ( 10^7 ) * Pi = 39.370078

3955.759533 * 5280 * 12 / ( 10^7 ) / ( log((sqrt137.035999701 ) * .37 )) = 39.370078

...this leads to an astounding coincidence , the Earth radius in the above formulas equals 3955.76737 miles as compared to the Pi generated earth radius of 3955.771795 miles or a difference of 23.3 feet in almost 4000 miles. This leads to confirmation of the legend that the Cheops pyramid height is a function of the Eath's dimensions , since the radius of the Earth reduced to ...2/Pi * 10^4 km. So let the fine-structure constant determine the Earth's radius:

log( sqrt137.035999701 * .37 ) * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250637420.6 inches ( 3955.767371 miles )

2 / Pi * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = 250637700.9 inches ( 3955.771795 miles )

J.Iuliano

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0908/0908.0852v1.pdf

( from the above article )

" A long standing prediction of universality is the Efimov effect , which was presented in the early 1970's. It is an anamolous effect which occurs in neutral three-body systems when at least two of the underlying subsystems have resonant s-wave interactions , a diverging scattering length ( or at least much larger than the range of the physical force ). This corresponds to the subsystems being close to the thresholds for binding. Under these conditions an exceptional sequence of infinitely many geometrically spaced three body bound states occurs with an accumulation point at zero energy. More over , the ratio between the energies is a universal constant depending only on the mass ratios and the particle statistics. For three identical bosons the famous ratio is:

( Et^n ) / ( Et^n+1 ) = e ^ ( 2 * Pi / S(o) ) = 515.028

...it is emphasized that this specific scaling factor is independent of the mass and that the same effect in principle can be found at all physical scales. " ( end article quote )

.......an investigation showed the following:

The Efimov equation for quark resonance was described in the article above by this formula: ( e = natural log = 2.718281828 )

e ^ ( 2 * Pi / S(o) ) = 515.0280503

....S(o) equals the transcendental number ( 1.00624...). What was not explained in the article is the simpler meaning to the quark resonance phenomena. The natural log e form is equivalent to a dodecagon that has phi as the polygons edge:

e ^ ( 2 * Pi / S(o) ) = ( 10^4 ) / phi / 12
515.0280503 = 515.0283245

...phi has the unique ability to pull Pi out of the natural log e function , in ratio, to describe the resonance constant:

e ^ ( 2 * Pi / S(o) ) = ( 10^3 ) * phi / Pi
515.0280503 = 515.0362142

...this is related to the fact that ten times Pi divided by 12 equals phi squared:

phi^2 = 10 * Pi / 12
2.6180339875 2.617993878

....the relationship of the resonance constant ( 515 ) to phi is through one-half the dodecagon or hexagon(6-quarks):

515.0280503 * 6 = ( 10^4 ) * ( phi - 1 ) / 2
3090.168302 3090.169935

...in the presentation slide show, the resonance constant ( 515 ) is used in inverse form...1/515...If one makes one leg of a dodecagon polygon equal to one-tenth phi , then the perimeter is the resonance constant....1/51502834 / 10^3 :

( 10^-3 ) * Pi / phi = 1/515.02834 = phi / ( 10^4 ) * 12
1/515.0362142 1/515.0283245

...treating the perimeter like an approximate circle the radius equals: ( phi - 1 ) / 2

( 10^3 ) / 515.02834 / 2 / Pi = radius = ( phi - 1 ) / 2
.309021719 .309016993

....by placing the resonance constant as a leg on a dodecagon creates a polygonal perimeter of...( phi - 1 ) * 10^4... and a strange split of the circular radius of the dodecagon caused by the special qualities of phi...phi^2 = Phi +1:

515.02834 * 12 = perimeter = ( phi - 1 ) * ( 10^4 )
6180.34008 6180.3398758

...the dodecagon also illustrates the connection of 12 to phi and then to Pi. If the perimeter is 12 , leg equals 1 , then the radius equals a phi link:

12 and phi

1 * 12 / 2 / Pi = radius = 5 / ( phi^2 )
1.909859317 1.92983006

phi and Pi.....perimeter = Pi
( phi^2 ) / 10 * 12 / 2 / Pi = radius = .5
.500007659

...an interesting consequence of the resonance constant ( 515 ) is that by squaring the node ( 515.02834^2 ) , phi is eliminated from the equation:

515.03227 ^ 2 = ( 10^7 ) / 12 / Pi

...a new constant has appeared ( one erg = 10^7 = Giorgi constant ) and the leg of the dodecagon is now Pi ! Knowing the importance of Pi in the resonance constant , a series of Pi equalities can be shown: IN = reciprocal natural log e

Pi = IN( ( 10^4 ) * ( phi-1 ) / 12 ) * S(o) / 2 ................... S(o) = 1.006239915
Pi = IN( ( 10^3 ) * phi / Pi ) * S(o) / 2 ................... S(o) = 1.006237446
Pi = IN( sqrt(( 10^7 ) / Pi /12 )) * S(o) / 2 .................. S(o) = 1.00623868
Pi = IN( ( 10^4 ) / phi / 12 ) * S(o) / 2 ...................S(o) = 1.006239915

...What is the mysterious transcendental constant , S(o) ? Since the unit one is the non-decimal remainder of S(o) , it seems the more important number to investigate is the decimal remainder...( .006239915 ) that is derived from phi only equations. The inverse decimal remainder equals ( 1/.006239915 = 160.258593226 ). This is a very complex number , seemingly random , without a pattern , transcendental. This is the last puzzle of the Efimov resonance effect , directed by the resonance equation for the energy nodes of particles...e^(2*Pi)/S(o). To me to crack this puzzle and understand its meaning , one has to use the limited tools of the primal numbers ..37 , 37*18 , 137( fine-structure constant ) , Cheops constructs ( 2/Pi ) , etc. The first attempts were using S(o) as expressed in the equations as a power to 37 , the results were interesting:

37 ^ ( 1.006239915 ^ 22 ) = Pi * 20
62.83346517 62.83185307

...this result was fairly accurate with 22 being Kabbalic. The next attempt was using inverse S(o) as a power to 37:

( 37 ^ ( 1/1.006239915 )) - 30 = ( phi - 1 ) * 10
6.180699605 6.180339875

...again fairly accurate, odd to note that 37 was the only number up to 75 ( don't know about greater than 75 ) that when powered by inverse S(o) gave a good approximation for phi. The next primal number used as a power base to S(o) was 666 ( 37*18 ). This result was interesting because phi again was involved as well as the dodecagonal number 12:

666 / ( 1.006239915 ^ 12 ) = ( phi-1 ) * ( 10^3 )
618.0957263 618.03398758

...this result is very strange in that the number from the shield of Yale University's secret society , Skull and Bones , which is the integer , 322 , is related directly to phi by the dodecagon number 12:

322 ^ ( 1/12 ) = phi
1.618035289 1.6180339875

...this approximation is very accurate , 99.99992% of phi. However more accuracy is needed , and this was given by the constructs of the greatest structure on Earth, Cheops pyramid , 2/Pi. Its relationship to S(o) is stunning , but not surprising , and once this equality was shown , both the fine-structure constant , aem = 1/137.035999701 , and the strong nuclear force , a(s) = 14 , were able to derive S(o):

Efimov resonance formula : S(o) = 1.00624
e ^ ( 2 * Pi / S(o) ) = 515.0280503

..S(o) derivatives from 37 , 57 , a(s) and aem:

S(o1) = (( 10^ ( 2/Pi )) * 37 ) ^ -1 + 1 = 1.006239912554
S(o2) = ( sqrt137.035999701 * ( 3.7^2 )) ^ -1 + 1 = 1.006239922786
S(o3) = ( a(s) * ( 1/57 +1/37 ) / ( 10^2 )) ^ -1 + 1 = 1.006239924135

...so the secret of the decimal remainder of S(o) is primal. To check for accuracy plug S(o) into this formula for Pi:

Pi = IN(( 10^4 ) / phi / 12 ) * S(o) / 2

Pi(S(o)1 = 3.141592648 ...........99.9999998% of Pi
Pi(S(o)2 = 3.1415926804 .........99.9999992% of Pi
Pi(S(o)3 = 3.141592685 ............99.999999% of Pi

...one of the strangest coincidences of S(o) is with the actual dimensions of the Earth...radius = 3955 median miles. Since it has been shown that the Cheops constructs, 2/Pi , is a function of the Earth's radius:

2 / PI * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = Earth's radius in inches = 3955.771795 miles

2 / Pi = Earth's radius / meter / ( 10^7 )

S(o) = (( 10 ^ ( Earth's radius / meter / ( 10^7 )) / 37 ) ^ -1 + 1 = 1.006239913

...thus it seems anything related to 2/Pi will derive S(o). A related phenomena is the Fermat form...e^ ( Pi + 8) ...and the strong nuclear force a(s) = 14:

log( sqrt(( e ^ (( Pi +8 ) / 2 )) / a(s) )) = 1.999997681 / Pi

S(o)4 = (sqrt(( e ^ (( Pi + 8 )) / 2 )) / a(s) ) * 37 ) ^ -1 + 1 = 1.00623992316

Pi(S(o)4 = 3.141592682 .....99.9999991% of Pi

...S(o) has a link to the primal number 82944 or 288^2 , through the natural log e:

((( 10 ^ ( 2/Pi )) ^ ( S(o) ^ 6 )) + 82944 ) ^ ( 1/Pi ) = 100/e
36.7879441288 36.7879441171

...another equality involving the inverse decimal remainder of S(o):

S(o) = ( Pi / (( 2109 / 94 ) ^ 2 )) + 1 = 1.006240975
S(o) = ( 2109 / 94 / a(s) * ( 10^2 )) ^ -1 + 1 = 1.00623992413

....2109 / 94 is the inverse harmonic mean of the integers 37 and 57:

( 1/57 + 1/37 ) = 94 / 2109

...collective unconscious constant root .891891891... and S(o): .510998908 = electron energy

S(o) = ( 37 / 3030 * .510998908 ) + 1 = 1.006239920659

...the S(o) constant's flesh is the decimal remainder. But the kernel of the whole thing is the Cheops root ...10^(2/Pi) = 4.331315029

( 10 ^ ( 2/Pi )) * 18 = 10 ^ ( 70/37 ) ..............collective unconscious ..... ( 70.00001427 / 37 )
( 10 ^ ( 2/Pi )) / 18 = IN( sqrt phi ) ..............the golden number ........... ( 1.61810745 )
( 10 ^ ( 2/Pi )) * 37 = 1 / ( S(o) - 1 ) ..............quark resonance ................( 1.006239913 )
( 10 ^ ( 2/Pi )) /.37 = sqrt 137.035999701 ........electrical fine-structure .......( 137.0364491 )

J.Iuliano

In the article is the following equation for S(o): sin , cos in radians:

( -v * cos( v * Pi / 2 )) + ( 8 / sqrt3 * sin( v * Pi / 6 ) = 0 ......equation (2.51)

...where to solve for v answers the three-body gravitational problem. Actually the complicated formula is another way to express the relationship between the dodecagon and phi:

( -v * cos( v * Pi / 2 )) + ( 8 / sqrt3 * sin( -v * 2 /Pi / 300 )) = 0

...where v = 1.006239861. Restating the equation defines Pi and 12:

sin^-1( -v * cos( v * Pi / 2 ) * sqrt3 / -8 ) * 1800 / v = -12 / Pi = -10 / ( phi +1 )

...solving for exactly 12/Pi calculates v to 1.0062398615. Where did ...sin( v * 2 / Pi /300 )...come from ? In equation (2.50) is the answer:

1 / sqrt(2/P) * ( - v * Pi / 2 )) + ( 8 / sqrt3 * sin( v * Pi / 6 )) / sin( v * Pi / 2 ) = 1/-a ......equation (2.50)

...look at this MONSTER !! This formula was Efimov's main discovery in his 1973 paper. Apparently inverting the denominator, sin( v * Pi / 2 ) , eliminates sin( v * Pi / 6 ) from the equation leaving a dodecagon divided by Pi. However its not a pure inversion being that only the Cheops constructs...2/Pi...inverts , plus this inversion is inside the sine function which should act as a barrier to inversion mathematics. The square root of 3 and 8 are geometric analogies to dimensional space This leaves the meaning of ..300 * 6 = 1800 , as all thats left to the Efimov equation's encapsulation into the dodecagon polygon divided by Pi. As shown previously , 18 , is the mass body weight of the distributive effects of the four fundamental forces of Nature:

18 = (( a(s) / aem ) ^ 2 ) * Gn / Gw * Me * pmev * ( 10^27 )

a(s) = strong nuclear = 13.9993765 ... (14)
aem = fine-structure = 1/137.035999701 ....exact
Gn = gravitational constant = 6.67428 * 10 ^ -11 ....exact
Gw = weak nuclear(fermi) = .0000116637 ....exact
Me = electron mass = 9.10 * 10^-31kg .....exact
emev = electron energy = .510998908 ....exact
pmev = proton energy = 938.272029 ....exact
c =speed of light = 299792458 ....exact
ev = elementary charge = 1.610 * 10^-19 .....exact

...since the electron and proton symbols , Me and pmev , are in different forms, Me=mass, pmev=energy, equalizing the electron to an energy mode only , shows that 18 is actually a mass of 18 kilograms! Converting to pure energy shows: E=m*c^2:

18 * ( c^2 ) / ev = (( a(s) / aem ) ^ 2 ) * Gn / Gw * emev * pmev * ( 10^33 )

...18 is also how the collective unconscious is linked to the fundamental forces through the electrical synapse form , the amplitude for an electron to emit or absorb a photon ( light to energy ) , fine-structure constant aem:

18 = 10 ^ (( 33 / 37 ) - ( 1.999998189 / Pi ) + 1 )
18 = ( .511000078 ^ 2 ) * pmev / cos137.035999701 / 37
18 = 10 ^ (( 33 / 37 ) + .9999997 ) / .37 * sqrt aem

...this also illustrates the connection of the Cheops construct...2/Pi.. and the 37-aem pair:

2 / Pi = ( 33 / 37 ) - log18 + 1
log(sqrt137.035999701) = ( 33 / 37 ) - log18 - log37 + 3

...as previously shown , Pi has multiple roots:

electrical
- 2 / Pi = log( sqrtaem^-1 ) + log37 ....1.999997763

nuclear
2 / PI = ( log( sqrta(s) * .37 ) ^-1 * ( c^2 ) / ( 10^18 ) ....a(s) = 13.99422391

earth metric
- 2 / Pi = IN(IN(IN( 39.370078 - 1.44 ))) - ( 33/37 ) ....1.99999744

collective unconscious
2 /Pi = (( 144.0000144 / 37 ) - 2 ) - log18

quark resonance
2 / Pi = 4 / ( IN(( 10^4 ) / phi / 12 )) / S(o)

....beyond 18 being the core of the fundamental forces, is the mathematical symbolism of the collective unconscious: 33/37 = .891891891

10 ^ ( 33/37 - 2/Pi + 1 ) = emev^2 * pmev / cos137.035999701 / 37 = 10 ^ ( 33/37 + 1 ) * sqrtaem /.37
17.99998402 17.99991757 18.00001353

...everything can be reduced to physics of the left side of the equation and primal numbers on the right;

emev^2 * pmev * sqrt137.035999701 / cos137.035999701 = 10 ^ ( 144 / 37 )

cos137.035999701 = emev^2 * pmev / 666

...which leads to this extraordinary reduction:

emev^2 * pmev * sqrt137.035999701 / cos137.035999701 = 666 * sqrt137.035999701 = 10 ^ ( 144/37 )
7796.318565 7796.354269 7796.36013

...placing the electron-proton energies into a dimensionless form ( ratio) creates the transcendental constant , Feigenbaum delta..Fd = 4.669201609 , displaying the accumulative weakness of the continuum's bifurcation into the infinite loop :

emev / pmev / Gw / 10 = Fd .... Gw = .0000116640286

....thus by substitution:

( Fd ^ 2 ) * ( pmev ^ 3 ) * ( Gw ^ 2 ) * 100 / cos 137.035999701 = 666 ...Gw = .00001166405531

...Gw equals the fermi-coupling charge , aka the weak nuclear force.

J.Iuliano

Let us know when this idea comes up with a testable prediction.
Until then it's not science (and it looks rather like numerology which is so silly that only Scorpios believe it).

An example of the collective unconscious phenomena is the cross-over link between different time references. This cross-over link has two separate savant individuals separated by 90+ years in time. The first person is from 1875 , who published a paper called , " Key to the Hebrew-Egyptian Mystery , The Source of Measures " , by J. Ralston Skinner , an epic 400 page report on his interpretation of the source of measure as something mixed with Christianity ,the Kabbala ,various Chinese and mid- eastern sources with mysticism and earth measures combined. It is a very undecipherable document rattling on like a Pentacostal preacher. However ,he does focus in particular on two numbers , both derived from his obsession with the twelfth century ,Chinese Pi ratio , determined by the two integers 113 and 355 ...355/113 = 3.14159292...In the paper he transforms this ratio into HIS root ratio , two integers , 6561 and 20612 ...20612/6561 = 3.141594269... as inspired by two lessor known characters ( Parker and Metius ) 30 years earlier who used these same numbers in their Earth measure studies. An example of the tone from the book is from the introduction to , " A Source of Measures " , page 6:

" The relation of 6561:20612 is both in the pyramid structure and in the Bible coupled with the form 113:355. Some connections between the two will be shown, but what the exact basic relations between them were , as anciently recognized , remains to be discovered. " ( end quote )

...from page 357

" The two values 113:355 and 6561:20612 are welded together in ancient use, and the attachment of a man (113) to the cross ( the unfolded cube of a circuference 355 ) is in display , the symbol of such welding. " ( end quote )

...Skinner goes on in his paper to describe some special qualities of the integer 20612 , mostly undecipherable links to Chinese Pi and Christianic mysticism , but he is somehow quite impressed with this particular number. The second savant individual example is from the 40 year, continual studies of a man named John Michell ( 1936-1998 ) a rather infamous underground researcher of ancient Earth structures , Cheops pyramid , Pyramid of the Sun , etc. and in particular Stonehenge. He thought that the stone lintel measurements of Stonehenge were an important Earth metric related to the Cheops pyramid. He was able to calculate ,in the early 1960's , the lintel stone measurements of Stonehenge to this constant...3.4757485 feet... by measuring the inner and outer diameters of the Stonehenge lintels and dividing by two...Inner diameter = 97.32096 ft, Outer diameter = 104.27245 ft ...( 104.27245 - 97.32096 ) / 2 = 3.4757485..( Michell's exact numbers ). He was quite impressed that this result was the measurement of the Sacred Rod of Kabbalic ancient mythical history. What Michell never mentioned and thus could not have known , was the secret to his mysterious Stonehenge lintel rings and their link, as Michell always searched for , to the Cheops pyramid. The link is pure energy as demonstrated by the primal energy of the electron...emev = .510998908 , and the Cheops pyramid constructs defined by the height to base leg ratio..( 2/Pi ): e = natural log e...2.71828182... all which determine the Sacred Rod = 3.47575

3.475832155 ^ .510998908 = e ^ ( 2 / Pi )
3.475832155 = e ^ ( 2 / Pi / emev )

...the electron energy is also holomorphic to phi ( 1.6180339875.. )

3.475771234 ^ ( phi^4 ) / ( 10^4 ) = emev

...concerning J.Ralston Skinner's number , 20612 , it turns out it is an Earth metric:

2 / Pi * ( 10^7 ) * 39.370078 = Earth radius in inches = 250637700.9 in. = 40000 * 39.370078 / 2 / Pi

sin 20612 = -.0105996
-666 / Pi / 20000 = -.010599719

...such that one-half the Earth's circumference = 20000 km

-665.992354 / Pi / sin20612 = 20000

...amazingly the link to the two constants, (Skinner)20612 and (Michell)3.4757485 , separated by 90+ years , is the amplitude for electron-photon emission and absorbtion, the electrical , fine-structure constant , aem = 1/137.035999701:

sin 20612 * 20000 = -665.992354 / Pi
sin 20612 * ( 3.474752384 ^ 4 ) / aem = -665.992354 / Pi

...which reduces to Earth metric:

20000 = ( 3.475752384 ^ 4 ) / aem

...thus the link to Michell's Stonehenge lintel constant , 3.4757.. , to Earth metric circumference divided by two is electrical in origin. Since the lintel measurement is in the fourth dimension, what happens in the third dimension...interesting results: e = natural log e:

3.475683831 ^ 3 = e ^ 3.737373...
3.475366603 ^ 3 = e ^ (e ^ ( 1 + 1/Pi ))

...what happens in the second dimension?....the electron mass !!: Me = electron mass = 9.1093821 * 10^-31 kg

3.475744482 ^ 2 = e ^ ( e ^ ( e ^ ( -Me * 10^29 )))
3.475797265 ^ 2 = e ^ ( e ^ ( e ^ ( log 3/3.7 )))

...turns out this number for the Sacred Rod , was independently discovered in the 1950's by a meso-american explorer and researcher , named Hugh Harleston Jr.. He discovered a unit measure of the Aztecs that he decribed as the " Standard Teotihuacan Unit " or STU. ...STU = 1.0594 meters. The Sacred Rod connects to this number through the metric conversion:

STU = 1.059408163 = 3.475748501 * 12 / 39.370078

( 1.059463094 * 8 ) - 5 = 3.475704755

...this means that Michell's precise measurement of the diameters of the Stonehenge lintels can be used to determine the metric origins of Harleston's STU:

97.32096 * 12 / 39.370078 / 28 = 1.059408184 = STU
104.27245 * 12 / 39.370078 / 30 = 1.059408184 = STU

...thus the ratio of the inner and outer diameters is 28/30:

97.32096 / 104.27245 = 28 / 30

...all measuring systems are electrical in origin , all equaling the Sacred Rod:

( 20000 * aem ) ^ ( 1/4 ) = 1.0594 * 39.370078 / 12 = ( 1.0594 ^ 2 ) * ( 10^2 ) * sqrt aem^-1 / 378
3.475752396 3.475721719 3.475723527

... the far right equation solves another mystery concerning Harleston's study of ancient Aztec ruins , that is his insistance that the Aztecs used a standard measuring theme in all their structures , a standard unit called a " hunab " , which is represented by the integer 378 !! Note that the " hunab " form and one-half Earth circumference , 20000 km , can be reduced:

( 20000 * aem ) ^ ( 1/4 ) = ( 1.0594 ^ 2 ) * ( 10^2 ) * sqrt aem^-1 / 378

( .0002 ^ ( 1/4 )) * ( aem ^ (3/4 )) = ( 1.0594 ^ 2 ) / 378

Since the investigation of the Sacred Rod , 3.475 ft , was shown as an ancient Earth metric , the attempt to link all of the sources , Modern Metric:39.370078 inches , Egyptian Cubit:20.6320498 inches and the Sacred Rod : 41.703 inches ( 3.475 * 12 ) resulted in a strange harmony , that again involved electron roots. In fact the mathematical , harmonic mean of the three measures , MM , EC and SR is mathematical amagram for the electron: emev = .510998908

EC = Egyptian Cubit = 20.6320498 inches
MM = Modern Metric = 39.370078 inches
SR = Sacred Rod = 41.7028277 inches ... ( 3.475 * 12 )

1/39.370078 + 1/20.6320498 + 1/41.70282766 = 1 / emev / 20

1/MM + 1/EC + 1/SR

...incredibly , Pi is hidden the structure of the three measures:

EC / MM / SR = 4 * Pi / ( 10^3 )

...this leads to the revelation of the " Secret of the Three Measures "....

" Pi times the Sacred Rod times the Modern meter is one quarter of the Egyptian cubit. "

EC / 4 = Pi * MM * SR / ( 10^3 )

...this equation solves the ancient geometric problem of squaring the circle. If one lets the Egyptian Cubit equal the circumference of a circle , then the radius of said circle is:

EC / 2 / Pi = MM * SR * 2 / ( 10^3 )

...which means a rectangular area with sides equal to the Modern Metric and Sacred Rod , respectively equals one -half the radius of the Egyptian Cubit circle. As a bonus the surface and volume geometries of a 3-dimensional torus can be shown. This strange result shows the paradoxial crossover point of torii where the volume and surface area of a torus object are equal:

R = 2 = loop radius
r = 1 = tube radius

Area of torus = 2 * ( Pi^2 ) * 1 * 2 = ( EC / MM / SR ) ^ 2 * ( 10^6 ) / 2
Volume of torus = 2 * ( Pi^2 ) * 1 * ( 2^2 ) = ( EC / MM / SR ) ^ 2 * ( 10^6 ) / 2

..another secret of the three measures involves the number seven or one-half the fundamental force constant , strong nuclear = 14. This is a holomorphic effect where the area of a triangle with sides equal to the three measures respectively , divided by fourteen ( as=14 ) , the fifth root of this result is equivalent to 20 times the harmonic mean of the three measures , which is the origin of the functions to begin with : Using Herons formula ( 60 a.d.) for areas of irregular triangles:

Area of triangle = sqrt( S * ( S - MM ) * ( S - EC ) * ( S - SR )) ....S = ( EC + MM + SR ) / 2

( Area of triangle with sides equal to MM,EC and SR / 14 ) ^ ( 1/5 ) = ( 1/MM + 1/EC + 1/SR ) * 20

...a deeper source is the weak nuclear force , Gw = .0000116637 , sometimes called the fermi coupling charge for weak nuclear decays. This uses the inverse harmonic mean of the three measures: log in base 10

333 + log( Gw * ( 10^5 )) = MM * EC * SR / ( MM + EC + SR )

J.Iuliano

I know they say there's one born every minute, but do you really think the book would sell?

I mean it's written by someone whose idea of a sensible reply to questions about prediction is to whitter on about stuff that happened the century before last. Is anyone really going to bother with it?

http://www.deuceofclubs.com/rv/ca1230b.htm
http://www.integratron.com/2History.html
http://www.lucernevalley.net/giant

Explain this....go to Google Earth coordinates:

34d 19m 58.14s N ....latitude
116d 23m 19.41s W ...longitude

...this is the object called the Giant Rock , GR , steeped in legend and mystery. Then go to Google Earth coordinates:

34d 17m 39.64s N ....latitude
116d 24m 13.42s W ....longitude

....this is a man-made object called the Integratron , IN ,This structure is directly related to to the Giant Rock. Now go to Google Earth coordinates:

51d 10m 43.81s N ...latitude
1d 49m 34.21s W ...longitude

...this the exact center of Stonehenge, SH , Then go to Google Earth coordinates:

29d 58m 45.28 N ....latitude
31d 8m 4.9s E ...longitude

...this is the exact center of Cheops pyramid , CH .The three Earth points, the Giant Rock , the Integratron and the Cheops pyramid can show that the electron energy is an inverse form of the proton energy, or in other words , they are the same object !! This occurs, whether by coincidence or intentional , because the Cheops pyramid latitude is symbolically and mathematically the representation of the speed of light ...c =299792458 m/s...10^-7 = Giorgi constant = 1 erg

CHlat = 29d 58m 45.28s = 299792458 * 10^-7

...the Integratron latitude is key to this form:

c = ( INlat - (( pmev * ( INlong - CHlong ) * ( 9^2 ) / ( INlong - GRlong ) / ( 10^8 ))) * 10^7 ...GRlong = 116.388709722 ...116d 23m 19.3s
c = ( INlat - ( pmev * emev * 9 / ( 10^3 ))) * 10^7

..the Giant Rock longitude for light speed is 1.7 meters from its center . The inverse effect of the electron to the proton can be shown:

1 / emev = ( INlong - GRlong ) / ( INlong - CHlong ) / 9 * 10^5 .... GRlong = 116.388709739...116d 23m 19.3s
pmev = ( INlong - GRlong ) / ( INlong - CHlong ) * ( INlat - CHlat ) / ( 9^2 ) * 10^8 ....GRlong = 116.388709721...116d 23m 19.3s

...Stonehenge is holographic to these forms: cosine in radians:

SHlat - CHlat = 66.6 / PI ....SHlat = 51d 10m 43.26s N ...17 meters from exact center of Stonehenge

INlat - CHlat = 66.6 * cos137.035999701 / emev * 9 / 10^2

...the Cheops constructs , 2/Pi , is a combination of the Stonehenge and Integratron latitudes :

2.000009324 / Pi = log( sqrt (( SHlat - INlat ) * 10 / 9 ))

...to find the Great Rock use the Stonehenge and Cheops pyramid latitudes:

GRlong = INlog - ( 1 / (( SHlat - CHlat ) * Pi ) GRlog = 116.388712893 ....116d 23m 19.3s

...the accuracy of the findings are astounding , comparing the correction factor only in the Giant Rock longitude shows this:

c = light speed......116.388709722
emev = electron ...116.388709739
pmev = proton.......116.388709721
GR and Pi..............116.388712893

...the electron and proton energies are exact to 2009 NIST:

emev = .510998908
pmev = 938.27209
fine-structure constant = 1/137.035999701

J.Iuliano

Very interesting. Thanks.

I had trouble with the links, but I searched and found them. I think these are the right ones --

-----

Giant Rock - split open

Wrong URL --

http://www.deuceofclubs.com/rv/ca1230b.htm

Should be --

The Splitting of Giant Rock
http://www.deuceofclubs.com/rv/cal230b.htm

---

The Integration - History

Wrong URL --

http://www.integratron.com/2History.html

Should be --

History
http://www.integratron.com/2History/History.html

---

Wrong URL --

http://www.lucernevalley.net/giant

Should be --

The Intrigue of Giant Rock
http://www.lucernevalley.net/giantrock/

Regards,

Joe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You seem to be talking to yourself.
Anyway, the number 137 must be important. Someone up the road from me has named their house after it.

I always thought it was 999 and they had the tablet up side down!

Explain this....go to Google Earth coordinates:

34d 19m 58.14s N ....latitude = GRlat
116d 23m 19.41s W ...longitude = GRlong

...this is the object called the Giant Rock , GR , steeped in legend and mystery. Then go to Google Earth coordinates:

34d 17m 39.64s N ....latitude = INlat
116d 24m 13.42s W ....longitude = INlong

....this is a man-made object called the Integratron , IN ,This structure is directly related to to the Great Rock. Now go to Google Earth coordinates:

51d 10m 43.81s N ...latitude = SHlat
1d 49m 34.21s W ...longitude = SHlong

...this the exact center of Stonehenge, SH , Then go to Google Earth coordinates:

29d 58m 45.28 N ....latitude = CHlat
31d 8m 4.9s E ...longitude = CHlong

...this is the exact center of Cheops pyramid , CH .The three Earth points, the Great Rock , the Integratron and the Cheops pyramid can show that the electron energy is an inverse form of the proton energy, or in other words , they are the same object !! This occurs, whether by coincidence or intentional , because the Cheops pyramid latitude is symbolically and mathematically the representation of the speed of light ...c =299792458 m/s...10^-7 = Giorgi constant = 1 erg

CHlat = 29d 58m 45.28s = 299792458 * 10^-7

...the Integratron latitude is key to this form:

c = ( INlat - (( pmev * ( INlong - CHlong ) * ( 9^2 ) / ( INlong - GRlong ) / ( 10^8 ))) * 10^7 ...GRlong = 116.388709722 ...116d 23m 19.3s
c = ( INlat - ( pmev * emev * 9 / ( 10^3 ))) * 10^7

..the Giant Rock longitude for light speed is 1.7 meters from its center . The inverse effect of the electron to the proton can be shown:

1 / emev = ( INlong - GRlong ) / ( INlong - CHlong ) / 9 * 10^5 .... GRlong = 116.388709739...116d 23m 19.3s
pmev = ( INlong - GRlong ) / ( INlong - CHlong ) * ( INlat - CHlat ) / ( 9^2 ) * 10^8 ....GRlong = 116.388709721...116d 23m 19.3s

,,,Stonehenge is holographic to these forms: cosine in radians:

SHlat - CHlat = 66.6 / PI ....SHlat = 51d 10m 43.26s N ...17 meters from exact center of Stonehenge

INlat - CHlat = 66.6 * cos137.035999701 / emev * 9 / 10^2

...the Cheops constructs , 2/Pi , is a combination of the Stonehenge and Integratron latitudes :

2.000009324 / Pi = log( sqrt (( SHlat - INlat ) * 10 / 9 ))

...to find the Great Rock use the Stonehenge and Cheops pyramid latitudes:

GRlong = INlog - ( 1 / (( SHlat - CHlat ) * Pi ) GRlog = 116.388712893 ....116d 23m 19.3s

...the accuracy of the findings are astounding , comparing the correction factor only in the Giant Rock longitude shows this:

c = light speed......116.388709722
emev = electron ...116.388709739
pmev = proton.......116.388709721
GR and Pi..............116.388712893

...the electron and proton energies are exact to 2009 NIST:

emev = .510998908
pmev = 938.27209
fine-structure constant = 1/137.035999701

...the three objects go on to describe even stranger phenomenon , they can define the symmetry of the fundamental forces. The first example is the gravitational force...Gn = 6.67428 * 10^-11:

( INlong - GRlong ) * 4 * 4 / 360 * erg(10^-7) = Gn = 6.674693778 * 10^-11

...the second example is the strong nuclear and electrical forces: as = 13.9994911 and aem = 1/137.035999701

1 / ( INlong - CHlong ) * 4 * 4 / 360 = aem / as

..the third example is the electron as a function of the electrical, strong nuclear and gravitational forces. This is a result of the product of the the two forms: emev = .510998923

( INlong - GRlong ) * 4 * 1 / 360 / ( INlong - CHlong ) * 10^6 = 1/emev

...which means a deep insight into the origin of the electron can be shown:

aem * Gn / as / 4 / 4 * 360 / 4 * 10^13 = 1 / emev
aem * Gn / as * 180 / 32 = 1 / emev

...that is ,the electrical force times the gravitational force divided by the strong nuclear force times cubing the circumference of the four quadrant circle ( radius = Cheops constructs = 2/Pi ) equals inverse electron. 360 acts in the single dimension as a single degree function , in the third dimension it acts as a volume transform. Since the neutronic form is carried out by the strong nuclear force gluon of the neutral boson W-particle...as(Wz) = .118701515 , it's connection is through the product of the fundamental forces and through the ratio of the three earth objects longitudes, INlong , GRlong and CHlong:

( INlong - GRlong ) * 4 * 2 / ( INlong - CHlong ) * 10 = as(Wz) ^ 2

...which again shows a deep insight into the structure of the electron:

aem * Gn / as / 4 / 4 * ( 360^2 ) / 2 = as(Wz) ^ 2
1 / emev * 360 * 2 / 10^5 = as(Wz) ^ 2

...combining the two forms:

as(Wz)^2 / 360 / 2 * 10^5 = 1 / emev

...reducing to the integers , 360 the Sumerian for the unit circle in degrees and the 32 paths of wisdom from the Kabbala or the Hindu " 32 smokes " ( dimensions)

aem * Gn / as / as(Wz)^2 = 32 / ( 360^2 ) / 10^8

...this form led to the previous discovery of the fine-structure constant ..aem.. as loop radius of a torus with Feigenbaum alpha...Fa = 2.502907875 .. as tube radius:

32 / (( Pi^Pi ) - 1 ) = 2 * Pi^2 * aem * Fa^2

...the Feigenbaum alpha form opened up the door to reveal the hidden structure of the elementary particles and the interaction of the fundamental force fields. From the original equation above for Fa as torus tube radius , one can rearrange to:

32 / aem = 2 * Pi^2 * (( Pi^Pi ) - 1 ) * Fa^2

...this Pi enriched equation is the the root of the three object , IN ,GR and CH , expression: pmev = proton = 938.272029 , Gn = 6.674231042 * 10^-11

32 / aem = (( 180 * 2 ) ^ 2 ) * Gn / as / as(Wz)^2 * 10^8
32 / emev = 180 * Gn / as / aem^-1 * 10^13
32 / emev = 1 * Gn * pmev * 10^9

....since 32 and the gravitational constant are the common numerator and denominator , rearrange:

32 / Gn = (( 180 * 2 ) ^ 2 ) * aem / as / as(Wz)^2 * 10^8
32 / Gn = 180 * emev / as / as(Wz)^2 * 10^13
32 / Gn = emev * pmev * 10^9

...the last equation is new !! A direct connection of the electron-proton energies to the gravitational force. This now gives physical meaning to the latitudes of the Integratron and Cheops pyramid used in the proton formula:

( INlong - GRlong ) / ( INlong - ( CHlong ) * ( INlat - CHlat ) * 4 * 4 / 360 / 360 * 10^10 = pmev
1 / emev * ( INlat - CHlat ) * 4 / 360 * 10^16 = pmev

...since the proton and electron can now be expressed as a function of gravity and the electron:

32 / Gn / emev / 10^9 = pmev
32 / Gn / emev * 10^13 = 1 / emev * 4 / 360 * ( INlat - CHlat ) * 10^4 = pmev

... the origin of the difference of the Integratron and Cheops pyramid latitudes can now be shown:

( INlat - CHlat ) = pmev * emev / 4 * 360 / 10^4
( INlat - CHlat ) = 32 / Gn / 4 * 360 / 10^13
( INlat - CHlat ) = 288 / Gn / 10^12

...paradoxically the angular difference of the latitudes of the Integratron and the Cheops pyramid infers that the forces and elementary particles , all interact under angular circumstances , since the four cardinal directions ( Pauli's dream mandalas ) represent the sum of four arc quadrants and that the equal division of the circumference ( 4 ) by 360 degrees shows the standard unit of one degree of measure. This unity is the gravitational energy between the electron and proton placed exactly the square root of 32 * 10^-9 meters apart: gravitational formula = Gn * Mass1 * Mass2 / distance between M1 and M2 , squared

Gn * Pmev * emev / sqrt(( 32 * 10^-9 )^2 ) = unity

... all fundamental forces and elementary particles can now be expressed as a function of the ratio...32 / gravitational constant: Fd = 4.669201609 = Feigenbaum delta

32 / Gn = 180 * emev / as / aem^-1 * 10^13 .....electrical force
32 / Gn = ( 180 * 2 ) ^ 2 * aem / as / as(Wz)^2 * 10^8 .....strong force
32 / Gn = emev * pmev * 10^9 ....electron-proton
32 / Gn = emev^2 / Gw / Fd * 10^8 ....weak force

...once the meaning of the difference between the two latitudes ..( INlat - CHlat ) was expressed , the following ancient Kabbalic phrase..." 288 sparks from broken vessels " ,( refering to the Seripoth throwing(gravity) towards earth of the vessel containing the " 288 sparks " , shattering the vessel and releasing the " 288 sparks " from its container,) this is all symbolic to the electrical phenomenon of the fine-structure constant...aem.. which is defined as "sparks" emitting or absorbing off the proton:

INlat - CHlat = 288 / Gn / 10^12

...from a previous discovery the gravitational constant and 10^2 have a log(base10) relationship to the electron:

log log ( Gn * 10^12 ) = emev^2 ...Gn = 6.6742 * 10^-11

...the unification of the fundamental forces through the number 32 explains Pauli's dream of the " world clock " which is rich in symbolism of time and the number 32 . This means a decay function for the electron from physics which leads to the amazing transcendental function...e^(2/Pi)...Eulers famous expression for the imaginary number i : sine in radians

sin( 32 / .5109988805 ) = - ( e ^ - ( Pi / 2 )) = - ( i ^ i )

J.Iuliano

I don't know why we've let this go on for so long...

Thread locked.

Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: J.Iuliano on 13/09/2009 22:07:36