So why if Nostradamus is right he didn't write clear sentences than writing puzzles? Because nobody will understand his puzzles and he will fool his followers forever.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The interesting question is why does anyone accept religion?
If science describes reality then magic describes non-reality.No.
Looking in magic as undiscovered science is a waste of time magic is not just a unique phenomenon that we are going to discover to be added to mainstream physics but is a whole of violations.It is like we are going to figure out the non-science or magic will that be useful ? every kid knows what is non-science , what is the not of water is liquid.
Simply magic can be defined as the non-science with no rules.
Magic is not real.
I formulate the sentence wrong Kryptid says before I discovered it I already take it as non-magical but what I was trying to say is, before I discovered it , it is unknown , after Discovered it I can describe it as magic.If I can not know how he did it through any means then he uses what I can call it magic.That approach does not make sense.
So, you think your computer works by magic?
This only a Newtonian thought .In General Relativity gravity force is neither a push nor a pullGravity force is the interaction between two masses inertial force is a push or a pullThe interaction between two masses is a pull.
If you drop something it is pulled to the Earth.
It sounds like you are still going with the argument from ignorance. You are basically saying, "If I can't figure out how he did it logically through non-magical means, then he must have used magic to do it".It is not supposed to be "non-magical" means it is supposed to be unknown means.
He uses his stick for balance, and as you imply he uses the disk for balance as well .Anyway still it is not logical to keep his shape for a long time.
carpet.jpg (97.13 kB . 666x280 - viewed 1132 times)If he is using magic, what is the little carpet for?
This is the video of the man in your link and he does it. he simply uses support for his body which is logical.The man in my link can not put any hidden support .The floating man will not tell what he is doing , but the scientific explanation in the link is impossible The person appears to raise no weight. He keeps his body shape.And he does it for a long time.Here is a man doing essentially the same thing.
He explains how the "trick" is done,.
It is an illusion.
Here is my hypothesis :How are
f=ma , and F=GMm/rē
"The hypothesis is fundamental for Both these Newtonian equations and special relativity equations"
those hypotheses fundamental to SR?
You put this in quotes like something official says this.
The premises of SR do not involve either of these equations. They are both Newtonian equations and the latter is only an approximation under relativity theory. SR makes no mention at all of gravitational mass.
Gravity force is the interaction between two masses inertial force is a push or a pullf in the first equation is the inertial force of object m and F in the second equation is the gravity force on m.I'd have said that m is inertial mass in the first equation. Force is force, and there's no inertial version of it.
The "magic" done by stage magicians are illusions. Tricks. They are not real.This how to be describing some phenomena that do not go with science.If we see something " illusions" that it really has been done by "tricks" and when touching a box and touching the 10 men"not real ", so What it left to judge it true?
If cone is friction-less then no contact between the cone and the ball which is equivalent to a rotating ball without put on a cone In this case circular motion equations apply by which small push will change ball path.In case of the cone there must be friction force between the ball and the coneIt would still work with a frictionless cone.