Click the 'Actions' pull down and the first option is 'Say Thanks'.
The following users thanked this post: Bored chemist
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The idea is crazy try to think of this: my body is 60 kg and when I lift it I must exert the same force I exert to lift a heavy rock of 60 kg but I move or lift lighter body of say 20 kg even though it should be heavy like the rock.How many times can you do pull ups?
I think like this can be thought of : people are familiar with lifting or moving heavy loads do you think you really jump, dance , walk, run, walk upside down,etc doing these with a load of your body 70 kg?
Now I see the problem the coming into existence at the very start is as the big bang theory so this is matter that is not living and therefore it is dead. Then the thinking / conscious universe is the second state coming into being so the dead but existing universe began to develop into a conscious entity.Why is this in new theories? This clearly is not a theory or a hypothesis, this is a wag at best. This should be moved to 'that can't be true'.
Once a virion has left the cell in which it was created it can either infect a new cell in the same host or shed to find a new host.Virions can't fly.
They can not tell if the next cell they come across is from the same host, or from someone they got sneezed onto (or whatever).
They are not in any position to make decisions about their fate.
So how do you calculate e exactly?If you need to specify the exact value, use the pronumeral e.
calculating a simple obvious exponential function like 10^x where x=3 using a Taylor series10 = e2.3026
I think your polynomial might struggle if k is complex or imaginaryThe exponential function converges for all imaginary values, too.
Although this group confess to intentionally changing laws like act 77 in Pennsylvania which was changed the year before the election happened, to allow mail in ballots, to remove requirements for signature verification, and for ballots to be accepted days after the election had happened.
Pennsylvania officials tried to have these law changes over turned as they were unconstitutional, yet were stuck down on technicalities not on merits.Those "technicalities" were that they had waited until over a year and 2 elections had passed. ( Oh, and by the way, one of those elections was were they picked up a couple of seats in the state legislature. You didn't hear them complaining that those results should be overturned).
Unless your data includes gravitational lensing then it isn't valid.No
In reality, gravity affects photons much the same as it affects you and me.
If you use hard gammas, then most of them would turn into pairs.Well, first you have to prove that the pure BBT energy could set those gammas.
"For photons with high photon energy (MeV scale and higher), pair production is the dominant mode of photon interaction with matter. "Yes I do.
Do you remember that page?
Quote from: Dave Lev on Today at 04:30:10You do not answer the question:
Would you kindly explain why the energetic photons could cross the Hydrogen chamber, the space which is full with Hydrogen atoms and our atmosphere without being transformed into new pair particles?
In much the same was as Xrays, gamma rays usually go through matter.
When it is just a ploy to push an agenda.The answer is "possibly, but no evidence to date".
Next question, please.
That doesn't answer the question. That reply relates to the question could the Covid vaccine damage fertility?
And it doesn't answer it, it leaves it as UNKNOWN.
The question was how can a question be fake news?
Clearly some scientists
Even if your maths was the right maths (it isn't) then you still left us a 30% chance.How could you claim that the math is incorrect?
That's not zero.
So you have not proved that it is wrong.
Let's go with "the size of the real observable universe" which is 92 BLY.
Therefore, R = 46 BLY.
Now, let's verify what is the chance that we are located at a distance of 12 BLY from its edge:
The Total volume for R is ref to R^3
V (ref for R=46 ) = 46^3
V (ref for R=46-12 ) = 34^3
The chance to be at the sphere with a maximal radius of 34 Ly is:
34^3/46^3 = 29.8%
Therefore, the chance that we would be at a distance of less than 12 BLY from the edge of the Universe is over than 70%.
In this case, we should clearly see the edge of the Universe (as we can observe to minimal distance of 13 BLY) and therefore the CMBR at that edge direction should be different from the other direction.
WHY DO YOU NOT LEARN?
Before trying to explain why something is true, it's a good idea to check if it is true.I spent some time working with a forensic phonetician. He assured me that the last word on every CVR he had analysed (several dozen) was always "sh1t". It is a remarkable finding: his skills ranged over at least ten major languages, but whatever the native language of the pilot, years of training kick in at the last moment; "in an emergency, speak English".
How often does the cockpit voice recorder tell us that someone's last words were"Our father who..."?