1
Physiology & Medicine / Re: Prebiotics.
« on: 07/09/2023 18:34:09 »I believe the term is probiotics.I believe that they refer to different things.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I believe the term is probiotics.I believe that they refer to different things.
length of the air column and the timbre of the harmonics are determined by the wood (or metal in most cases nowadays) .So, a brass flute would sound more like a tin whistle than like a wooden flute.
: if you filled your trombone or bagpipe with helium, would that alter its pitch?One way to find out; check on YT and see if it's been done.
Then we can confidently state that you are notHow many kids have you got?
I have no kids.
leading to a higher, new species
Pesticides?That's probably the only thing we can rule out.
To which the answer is that it was named by French colonists after the people who inhabited the area in the 16th century.It seems the name predates the French.
OKHow big is your apparatus?Let's pretend that the apparatus is similar to what's shown here. Just replace the salt bridge with a tube, filled with a mixture of solutions from both containers.
in water the species will be H3O+, H5O2+ and possibly some others( can't remember offhand).A fairly common model assumes that the species (in dilute solutions ) is H9O4 +
Thanks for clarifying that pi means the osmotic pressure rather than pi.pi = iMRTIMO, it's hidden in the dimension of osmotic pressure pi, which is ML(-1)T(-2).
The higher the value of pi, the lower the equilibrium time will be. It can be done by increasing temperature.
As you said, diameter and length of the connecting tube will also be influential.
How do I convert that into a force in Newtons?You divide it by a distance.
I think I have a clear understanding of the points made by Alancalverd and BC. Alan says the absorption band is already saturated. BC agrees with this analysis but points out that the absorption will occur at lower atmospheric levels as the co2 concentration rises and this makes perfect sense if we had a static atmosphere but we know the atmosphere is highly turbulent. It would be a hell of a problem to analyse rigorously. Me, I am still sitting on the fence( hoping to not get splinters in my butt ) in a state of confusion.It's not a trivial problem, but here's a useful simplification.
"Travelling by train produces up to 513% less carbon emissions than flying".So, your argument is something like "Because someone wrote bad advertising copy, physics is wrong".
but the key processes of photosynthesis incorporate it into the -CH2- skeleton of carbohydrates and other complex molecules.We know.
Not sure what you mean by "reduced",A change in oxidation state from nominally (IV) to (0)
For the record, it was Alan's point about the absorption being saturated that got my attention and not the historical record. I do accept that there has been an unprecedented rise in co2 due to use of fossil fuels.Hi Paul.
sorry not buying itThere are three reasons for not "buying" reality.
BC, we are all a bit odd, so are we all neurodiverse? In that case the term loses it's meaningNo
The problem with newspeak is that it takes as axiomatic that any adjective describing a deviation from the norm is in some way unacceptable and discriminatory,That's the exact opposite of what recognising neurodiversity is about.
Forgery is forgery, and we've had to live with it for as long as anyone has valued authenticity.Yes.